Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Goncharov V.V. Model of evolution of the universe in philosophy of global constitutionalism

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the model of evolution of the universe in philosophy of global constitutionalism. The model of evolution of the universe in any socio-philosophical concept suggest the formulation and substantiation of its own construct of formation and development of the surrounding reality (material and immaterial world). The philosophy of global constitutionalism conclusively formed at the brink of the XX and XX centuries as an active instrument of formatting of the socio-political, state-legal, and financial-economic development of the modern national state under in hands of the global ruling class, is based on the experience of the socio-philosophical concepts of the past, namely neoliberal and neoconservative doctrines. The author explores the signs of the model of evolution of the universe in philosophy of global constitutionalism, and suggests that various models of evolution of the universe play an important role in the context of globalization of the socio-political, state-legal, and financial-economic development of the existing national states and societies, which are being actively studied by the contemporary scholars, philosophers, legal experts, and political scientists. The following models are being considered: : linear globalization (A. Comte); world of system of globalization (I. Wallerstein, A. G. Frank, S. Amin, J. Arrighi, T. dos Santos, A. I. Fursov, A. V. Karataev); globalization as continuation of modernization (A. Giddens); global system (L. Sklair), and others.


Keywords:

international, constitutionalism, global, philosophy, creation, evolution, model, local, state, person


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Vasil'ev B.V. Filosofiya prava russkogo neoliberalizma kontsa XIX-nachala XX veka: diss. … doktora filosofskikh nauk.-Sankt-Peterburg, 2005.-S. 5-15.
2. Posadskiy A. Neoliberalizm i ekologizm. Razvernutye tezisy doklada na Sobornykh slushaniyakh VRNS po teme «Ekonomika v usloviyakh globalizatsii. Natsional'nyy vzglyad».-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.vrns.ru/analytics/4197/#.V7sxs49OLIU (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
3. Shashkin P.A. Suverennaya demokratiya v konturakh novogo mirovogo poryadka. Khristianskiy vzglyad na sovremennye problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.perspektivy.info/print.php?ID=35961 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
4. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Ideya evolyutsii i global'nyy evolyutsionizm.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.socionauki.ru/news/158140 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
5. Kristol I. Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea.-New York, 1995.-P. 37.
6. Kristol W., Kagan R. Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy // Foreign Affairs.-July/August 1996.-P. 1-2.
7. Vystuplenie Svyateyshego Patriarkha Kirilla v Kievo-Pecherskoy lavre na vstreche s arkhiereyami, dukhovenstvom, monashestvuyushchimi, miryanami, prepodavatelyami i studentami Kievskoy dukhovnoy akademii [Elektronnyy istochnik].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/707274.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
8. Næss A. Interpretation and preciseness. II. Mimeographed.-Oslo 1948, 57 pp.
9. Næss A. Ecology, community, and lifestyle, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.-348 p.
10. Ivanov D.V. Evolyutsiya kontseptsiy globalizatsii.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://val--s.narod.ru/glob/gl_ivanov1.htm (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
11. Kont O. Obshchiy obzor pozitivizma / Perevod s frantsuzskogo I. A. Shapiro. Pod red. E.L. Radlova.-Izd. 2-e.-M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2011.-296 s.
12. Vallerstayn E. Analiz mirovykh sistem i situatsiya v sovremennom mire. / Per s angl. P. M. Kudyukina pod obshchey red. B. Yu. Kagarlitskogo.-SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2001.-416 s.
13. Amin Samir. Virus liberalizma. Permanentnaya voyna i amerikanizatsiya mira.-M. «Evropa».-2007.-S. 10-13.
14. Frank A.G. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? 1993.-S. 20-23.
15. Arrigi D. Globalizatsiya i istoricheskaya makrosotsiologiya // Prognozis.-2008.-¹ 2.-S. 57-72.
16. Dos Santos T. Socialismo o fascismo. El nuevo caracter de la dependencia y el dilema latinoamericano. Buenos Aires, 1973.-S. 34-40.
17. Fursov A.I. Mir, kotoryy my pokidaem, mir, v kotoryy my vstupaem, i mir mezhdu nimi (Kapital(izm) i Modern-skhvatka skeletov nad propast'yu?) // De futuro, ili Istoriya budushchego.-Moskva: Politicheskiy klass; AIRO-XXI, 2008.-S. 255-304.
18. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity.-Stanford, 1990.-P. 60, 63, 64, 71.
19. Sklair L. Sociology of the Global System.-Hemel Hempstead, 1991.-P. 7.
20. Therborn G. European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies 1945-2000.-London, 1995.-P. 738-739.
21. Bauman Z. Globalization: The Human Consequences.-Cambridge, 1998.-136 p.
22. Lash S., Urry J. Economies of Signs and Space.-London, 1994.-360 p.
23. Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity // Global Modernities. Ed. by M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R. Robertson.-London, 1995.-P. 25-42.
24. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska: Na puti k drugomu modernu.-M., 2000.-383 s.
25. Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy // Global Culture. Ed. by M. Featherstone.-London, 1990.-P. 295-310.
26. Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii: Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii. Per. s fr.-Izd. 2-e.-M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2011.-80 s.
27. Beck U. Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt a.-M., 1998.-S. 28, 40, 42, 44, 131.
28. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.-Minneapolis, 1996.-P. 178-199.
29. E.M. Spirova Adler o raskolotosti chelovecheskogo bytiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2010. - 2. - C. 51 - 56.
30. S.F. Udartsev Evolyutsiya idei evropeyskogo edinstva i opyt ee realizatsii v modelyakh gosudarstvennogo ustroystva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 11. - C. 1925 - 1932.