Library
|
Your profile |
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Al'perovich V.D.
Metaphors in Interpretative Repertoires of Images of "Friends" and "Aliens"
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2016. ¹ 6.
P. 502-509.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=68232
Al'perovich V.D. Metaphors in Interpretative Repertoires of Images of "Friends" and "Aliens"Abstract: The problem of differentiation between communicative partners as «friends» and «aliens» is touched by the author in this article. Alperovich discusses the role of metaphors in perception of the others as «friends» and «aliens» as well as criteria for their categorization in communication and interaction. Interconnections of metaphors of «friends» and of «aliens» with interpretative repertoires (dispositive, conative, normative, mythologic etc.) of perception of the others as «enemies» and «friends» constitute the subject of the present research. The author elaborates a classification of metaphors of «friends» and of «aliens» based on the cognitive conception of metaphor in psychology including antropomorphical metaphors, artifact metaphors, abstract metaphors, zoomorphic metaphors, naturomorphic metaphors and magic metaphors. The author has discovered that metaphors of different types form different interpretative repertoires of images of «friends» and of «aliens». Antropomorphical metaphors are means of dispositive repertoire. Artifact metaphors are means of normative repertoire. Zoomorphic metaphors and naturomorphic metaphors are means of mythologic repertoire. «Magic» metaphors are means of fatalistic repertoire. Keywords: dispositive repertoire, interpretative repertoire, Friend, Enemy, aliens, friends, metaphor, conative repertoire, normative repertoire, mythologic repertoire
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Budanov A.V. Varvarizatsiya v prostranstve vzaimodeistviya «svoi»-«chuzhie» // Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo. 2014. ¹ 3. S. 353-373.
2. Vislova A.D. Differentsiatsiya lyudei po printsipu «svoi-chuzhoi» v protsesse razvitiya lichnosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Ser. Psikhologicheskie nauki. 2008. T. 2. ¹ 1. S. 34-43. 3. Grishaeva L.I. «Svoi» i «Chuzhoi»: osmyslyaya zanovo uzhe poluchennyi rezul'tat // Yazyk, kommunikatsiya i sotsial'naya sreda. Vyp. 13. Voronezh, 2015. S. 51-77. 4. Kagan V.E. Homo Xenophobicus: psikhologiya «svoego» i «chuzhogo» // Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2011. ¹ 2(6). S. 40-45. 5. Kamyshnikova T.F., Gross A.A. Mezhetnicheskaya tolerantnost' kak faktor politicheskoi stabil'nosti: nekotorye aspekty opredeleniya «svoikh» i «chuzhikh» i nesovpadenie mental'nykh i geograficheskikh granits // Voprosy natsional'nykh i federativnykh otnoshenii. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 32-38. 6. Kachmazova A.U., Tamer'yan T.Yu. Kognitivnye mekhanizmy etnostereotipizatsii «svoikh» i «chuzhikh» // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2014. ¹ 4 (50). S. 298-305. 7. Kozyrev G.I. Istoki i prichiny negativnoi identifikatsii lyudei na «svoikh» i «chuzhikh», na «druzei» i «vragov» // Soyuz. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 69-71. 8. Kolodina N.I. Stereotipizatsiya myshleniya kak formirovanie kognitivnogo mekhanizma raspoznavaniya ob''ekta «svoi» i «chuzhoi» (psikholingvisticheskii aspekt) // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2014. ¹ 5. S. 245-254. 9. Kosova O.A. Stereotipy rechevogo povedeniya kak odin iz faktorov kategorizatsii mira (na osnove binarnoi oppozitsii svoi / chuzhoi) // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2010. ¹ 4. S. 97-105. 10. Kusainova G.S. Svoi i chuzhie: stereotipy i reprezentatsii // Nauka segodnya: zadachi i puti ikh resheniya: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Vologda: Marker, 2016. S. 150-152. 11. Kutkovoi N.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti emotsii udivleniya: Avtoref. dis… kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2016. 24 s. 12. Matveeva A.A. O chelovecheskom oblike «svoego» i zverinom oblich'e «chuzhogo» (na materiale sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka) // Kazanskaya nauka. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 134-136. 13. Nekhorosheva A.M. Osnovnye kognitivnye mekhanizmy formirovaniya oppozitsii «svoi-chuzhoi» // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2011. ¹ 8. S. 131-134. 14. Pen'kova V.N. Otnoshenie k «svoim» i «chuzhim» v podrostkovom i rannem yunosheskom vozrastakh. Dis. …kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2006. 188 s. 15. Poluyanova A.I. Metaforicheskie sredstva eksplikatsii bazovoi oppozitsii «svoi»-«chuzhie» v politicheskom diskurse SShA // Molodoi uchenyi. 2014. ¹ 12 (71). S. 427-430. 16. Polyushkevich O.A. «Svoi» i «chuzhie»: sotsiokul'turnye markery // Diskussiya. 2011. ¹ 5. S. 84-89. 17. Smirnova D.V. «Svoi» ili «chuzhie»: politika «gastarbaiterizatsii» // Aktual'nye voprosy obshchestvennykh nauk: sotsiologiya, politologiya, filosofiya, istoriya. 2013. ¹ 31. S. 39-45. 18. Khlyshcheva E.V. Mifologema «svoi-chuzhoi» v geterotopnom prostranstve obshchestva potrebleniya // Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie. 2015. T. 15. ¹ 3. S. 34-49. 19. Shirkov Yu.E. Strategii samokategorizatsii v sisteme predstavlenii o «svoikh» i «chuzhikh»: Avtoref. diss. … kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2009. 29 s. 20. Shityi V.P., Trushnikova V.I. Mezhetnicheskii konflikt kak stolknovenie obrazov «svoi» i «chuzhoi»: sotsial'no-pedagogicheskii aspekt // Regional'noe obrazovanie XXI veka: problemy i perspektivy. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 205-207. 21. Cavicchiolo E., Alivernini F., Manganelli S. Immigrants are like… The representation of immigrants in Italy: The metaphors used by students and their family backgrounds [Gli immigrati sono come … La rappresentazione degli immigrati in Italia: Le metafore degli studenti e il background familiare di provenienza] // Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 2016, no 13, pp. 163-190. 22. Jamrozik A., McQuire M., Cardillo E.R., Chatterjee A. Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2016, pp. 1-10 (article in press). 23. Pinelli E. The role of metaphor and metonymy in framing terrorism: The case of the Beslan school siege in the Russian media // Metaphor and the Social World, 2016, no 6 (1), pp. 134-155. |