Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Nikitin V.V. Foreign construction companies in self-regulated organizations: issues of management

Abstract: The article considers the issues of foreign construction companies’ membership in self-regulated organizations in the field of construction. The author analyzes the provisions of the current Russian legislation regulating relations in the field of a foreign organization’s admission to construction activity. The research subject includes the differences and similarities between qualification requirements, procedures and the status of self-regulated organizations of foreign construction organizations and residing organizations. The author pays attention to the issues of safety ensuring in construction via administrative public legal methods. The study is carried out from the position of administrative and entrepreneurial law, taking into account that the problem of self-regulation in safety ensuring is based on the combination of regulation by public-legal and civilized means. The author concludes that the foreign construction organizations’ legal status regulation in the Russian Federation is carried out primarily by substatutory acts and contains numerous gaps; still the self-regulated organization membership, from the point of law, doesn’t require the establishment of a branch or representational office in Russia. The current legal provisions, perhaps, indirectly restrict the right of foreign construction organizations’ permit to construction activities (general contract). 


Keywords:

private international law, technologies, investments, safety, representational office, branch, foreign construction organizations, self-regulated organization, design, construction


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Petrova A.V. Sovremennye aspekty formirovaniya innovatsionno-in-vestitsionnoy strategii razvitiya predpriyatiya // Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy. – 2015. – ¹ 2 (41). – S. 107-111.
2. Leskova Yu.G. Kontseptual'nye i pravovye osnovy samoregulirovaniya predprinimatel'skikh otnosheniy, «Statut», 2013, 384 s. // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
3. Laptev V.V. Sovremennye problemy predprinimatel'skogo (khozyaystvennogo) prava // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo v XXI veke: preemstvennost' i razvitie – M., 2002, s.5
4. Laptev V.V. Predprinimatel'skoe (khozyaystvennoe) pravo i real'nyy sektor ekonomiki. M., 2010, 88 s.
5. "Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 17.11.1995 N 169-FZ "Ob arkhitekturnoy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (postateynyy) (Biryukova (Tsiss) T.A.) (otv. red. M.Yu. Lobanova) (Podgotovlen dlya sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus, 2012). SPS Konsul'tant Plyus.
6. Ganeev R.R. Stroitel'stvo kak raznovidnost' predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti // Yurist. 2014. ¹ 18. SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
7. Vse o samoregulirovanii: [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.all-sro.ru. (Data obrashcheniya 20.05.2016)
8. Ershov O.G. Pravovoe polozhenie arkhitektora v stroitel'stve: sravnitel'nyy analiz frantsuzskogo i rossiyskogo prava // Pravo i ekonomika. 2014. ¹ 2. S. 24-27.
9. Voprosy SRO [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: www.nostroy.ru. (Data obrashcheniya 20.05.2016).
10. Raynikov A.S. Osnovnye chastnopravovye sem'i: obshchie cherty // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. ¹ 9. s.72-80.