Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Koptelova T.I. Postmodernism as deconstruction of life and call to modern science

Abstract: The postmodernism is considered in this article not only, as the phenomenon of modern culture defining lifestyle, tastes and requirements of a civilized society but also as feature of thinking, as a call to scientific knowledge. The deconstruction (the direction of post-modernist criticism, one of manifestations of global unification of culture and the nature) is investigated from a position of organic type of philosophy of history and the multinational approach developed in domestic tradition (eurasianism of the 20-30th of the XX century and the theory of ethnogenesis of L.N. Gumilev). In this research the analysis of a current crisis state of science is submitted and an attempt to define its world outlook and sociocultural reasons is made. Achievements of modern science in the field of creation and distribution of GMO as one of ways of unification of the biosphere are presented to attention of the reader. Achievements of European civilization in distribution of "universal" culture and destruction of a national variety, are also obvious. Understanding of the modern world outlook problems defining now destiny of mankind is a first step on the way to formation of new rationalism in which there will be a place for various national interests where it is possible to keep a priority of cultural wealth and freedom of creative search.


Keywords:

civilization, eurasianism, culture, unification, biosphere, science, deconstruction, postmodernism, technosphere, outlook


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Dorozhkin, A.M., Tkachev, A.N. Problema osnovaniy nauki i skepticheskaya mysl' / A.M. Dorozhkin, A.N. Tkachev // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo.-2014.-¹ 6. S. 105-109.
2. Baldina O.D. Izobrazitel'no-plasticheskie formy narodnoy kul'tury v ikh vzaimodeystvii s drugimi plastami sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: k postanovke problemy / O.D. Baldina // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2011.-5.-C. 76-88.
3. Medvedev M.S. Sravnitel'nyy analiz traditsionnoy i sovremennoy kul'tury / M.S. Medvedev // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-¹ 3.-C. 80-87.
4. Kutyrev V.A. Filosofiya transgumanizma: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie / V.A. Kutyrev.-Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy universitet, 2010.-85 s.
5. Gumilev L.N. Konets i vnov' nachalo: Populyarnye lektsii po narodovedeniyu / L.N. Gumilev.-M.: Rol'f, 2001.-384 s.
6. Dzhon Khodzhes. Est' li al'ternativa intensivnomu zhivotnovodstvu?-URL: http://www.vestiruza.ru/article/222/est-li-alternativa-intensivnomu-zhivotnovodstvu/
7. Gumilev L.N. Etnosfera: Istoriya lyudey i istoriya prirody / L.N.Gumilev.-M., 1993.-544 s.
8. Gumilev L.N. Struna istorii. Lektsii po etnologii / L.N. Gumilev. Sostavlenie, predislovie, kommentarii O.G. Novikovoy.-2-e izd., ispr. i dop.-M.: Ayris-press, 2008.-608 s.
9. Koptelova T.I. Unifikatsiya — osnova global'noy ekonomiki ili samounichtozhenie chelovechestva? Otvet s tochki zreniya evraziyskoy filosofii istorii / T.I. Koptelova // Filosofiya khozyaystva. Al'manakh Tsentra obshchestvennykh nauk i ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova. 2015.-¹ 2.-S. 64-72.
10. Trubetskoy N.S. Nasledie Chingiskhana / N.S. Trubetskoy.-M.: Agraf, 2000.-560 s.
11. Koptelova T.I. Ekonomika i pravoslavie-evraziyskiy variant «kapitalisticheskogo dukha» / T.I. Koptelova // Filosofiya khozyaystva. Al'manakh Tsentra obshchestvennykh nauk i ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova.-2014.-¹ 5.-S. 191-198.
12. Derrida Zh. Struktura, znak i igra v diskurse gumanitarnykh nauk // Frantsuzskaya semiotika: Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu / Zh.Derrida. Per s frants.. sost., vstup. st. G.K. Kosikova.-M.: IG Progress. 2000.
13. Savitskiy P.N. Kontinent Evraziya / P.N. Savitskiy.-M.: Agraf, 1997.-464 s.
14. Tul'chinskiy, G.L. Postchelovecheskaya personologiya. Novye perspektivy svobody i ratsional'nosti / Tul'chinskiy G.L.-Spb., 2002.
15. Florovskiy G.V. Iz proshlogo russkoy mysli / G.V. Florovskiy.-M.: Agraf, 1998.-432 s.
16. Guseynov A.A. Chto my takoe? / A.A. Guseynov // Chelovek.-2001.-¹ 2.
17. Koptelova, T.I. Evraziyskaya metodologiya izucheniya sotsial'nogo razvitiya / T.I. Koptelova // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki.-2014.-¹ 1 [33].-S. 141-145.
18. F. Uil'yam Engdal': Semena razrusheniya: taynaya podopleka geneticheskikh manipulyatsiy. URL: http://www.warandpeace.ru/ru/exclusive/view/50096/
19. Kutyrev V.A., Nilogov, A.S. Ob ekspansii vysokikh (postchelovecheskikh) tekhnologiy, ee perspektive, ikh tvortsakh i zhertvakh / V.A. Kutyrev, A.S.Nilogov // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.164-202. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1.10676. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10676.html
20. Gumilev L., Panchenko A. Chtoby svecha ne pogasla: Dialog / L. Gumilev, A. Panchenko.-L.: Sov. Pisatel', 1990.-128 s.
21. Gumilev L.N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli / L.N.Gumilev.-M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2001.-560 s.
22. Professor Dorozhkin: “Nastoyashchiy uchenyy – eto eshche i filosof, sposobnyy zadavat' voprosy”.-Ofitsial'nyy sayt VyatGU. URL: http://www.vyatsu.ru/internet-gazeta/professor-dorozhkin-nastoyaschiy-uchenyiy-eto-esch.html
23. Volynskiy A. Kategoriya etnosa.-URL: http://www.gumilev-center.ru/kategoriya-ehtnosa/
24. Kalabekova S.V., Napso, M.D. Sokhranenie etnokul'turnoy samobytnosti kak faktor realizatsii natsional'nykh interesov v usloviyakh obshchestva postmoderna / S.V. Kalabekova, M.D. Napso // Pravo i politika.-2013.-6.-C. 771-777. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.6976.