Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Eremenko E.A. Equity and Efficiency in Taxation: Methodological Reflections

Abstract: In this article Yeremenko examines the organic relationship between the categories of equity and efficiency arising from a corresponding relationship of ethics and economics. According to the author, the relationship between ethics and economics should be thoroughly studied from the economical and philosophical points of view. The purpose of the article is to show the organic relationship between the categories of equity and efficiency arising from a corresponding relationship of ethics and economics. The author of the article tries to demonstrate the withdrawal from the ethical grounds of economics towards mathematical analysis did not lead to the desired outcome. This is proved by the fact that mainstream economics is unable to predict economic crises, on the contrary, it is the period of crisis when economics produce new movements relating economic problems to their ethical grounds. In the course of writing this research the author has used methodology of scientific theoretical analysis as well as systems approach. Based on the theoretical material, the author of the study examines the hypothesis that equitable tax system is economically effective. Examples considered by the author confirm this hypothesis, however, the problem is that the efficiency of equitable taxation is achieved in the long term, this creates certain difficulties in the process of assessing it. On the basis of the conducted research, the author developed a doctrinal definition of equity in taxation. 


Keywords:

equitable taxation, equity in taxation, concept of equity, equitable taxation system, ethics and economics, tax efficiency, tax equity, taxation, efficiency, equity


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. D'yakova V.V. Protivorechie mezhdu sotsial'noy spravedlivost'yu i ekonomicheskoy effektivnost'yu v sovremennom publichnom upravlenii / V.V. D'yakova // Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. – 2009. – ¹106. – S. 225-230.
2. Berg A. Ostri D. Neravenstvo i neustoychivyy rost: dve storony odnoy medali. / A. Berg, D. Ostri // Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika. – 2013. – T.8. ¹4. – S. 77-99.
3. Makasheva N.A. Eticheskie osnovy ekonomicheskoy teorii: Ocherki istorii / N.A. Makasheva. – M.:INION, 1993.
4. Makasheva, N.A. Vzaimosvyaz' etiki i teorii v istorii ekonomicheskoy mysli: avtoref. diss. ... d-ra ekon. nauk: 08.00.02 / Makasheva Nataliya Andreevna. – M., 1995. – 42 s.
5. Problemy sotsial'noy spravedlivosti v zerkale sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii / Obshch.red. D.D. Moskvina. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2002. – 192 s.
6. Sen A. Ob etike i ekonomike. – M.: Nauka, 1996. – 160 s.
7. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. – M.: Sotsekgie, 1962. – 684 s.
8. Spravedlivost' i razvitie: doklad o mirovom razvitii / [red. Bondarenko A.V.; per. s angl. Gurova I.P. i dr.]. – M.: Ves' Mir, 2006. – 312 s.
9. Finansovyy krizis i provaly sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki (materialy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma) // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2010. – ¹6. – S.10-11.
10. Jonathan D. Ostry, Andrew Berg, and Charalambos G. Tsangarides. Redistribution, Inequality and Growth / IMF STAFF DISCUSSION NOTE. 2014.
11. Okun Arthur. EqualityandEfficiency: TheBigTradeoff (1975).
12. Sharing the Pie /// Alvin Rabushka, ‘The Flat Tax’, in International Economic Conference Progress Foundation 2000, The Flat Tax: American and European Perspectives (2000) 3, at 4, and Alvin Rabushka, A Simplified Tax System; The Option for Mexico (Essays in public policy no. 38) (1993), at 5