Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Demenev D.N.
About a taste problem in art
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. ¹ 3.
P. 440-451.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=67735
Demenev D.N. About a taste problem in artAbstract: The main subject of this research are taste judgments in the visual arts. Several centuries ago, German philosopher Immanuel Kant formulated his famous antinomy of taste. According to the author they remain relevant to this day. Contradictions between the public and professional and artistic (personal) preferences, the author examines how the struggle between two authoritarian systems: from the perspective of a viewer (customer) and from the perspective of the Author. The author of this study believes that it is absolutely free from any conditions the artist was at the dawn of the art in primitive society. Removing the taste of the contradictions in contemporary artistic practice, in the opinion of the author of the study, through an "action conventions". Methodological base of research is the method of the structurally functional analysis; dialectical method; a method of intellectual speculation, as well as General scientific (General logical) methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy. The study's author comes to the following conclusions:1. The great assumption of I. Kant about the social background of the antinomies, remains relevant today.2. A century later, from early modernist experiments, in the synthesis of the aforementioned constructs, the modern visual art comes to the measure of conditionality. The concept of "measure of conditionality" is a a so-called aurea mediocritas (Latin) – the "Golden mean" and gives a key to the synthesis of these and other opposites. Keywords: Reasoning, Contradiction, Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, Art, Authoritativeness, Measure of conditionality, Painter, Taste
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. D. Ya. Severyukhin Khudozhestvennyy rynok i samoorganizatsiya khudozhnikov Leningrada–Sankt-Peterburga v perekhodnyy period (seredina 1980-kh – seredina 2000-kh godov) // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 74 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.8.
2. Pogontseva D.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya dinamika predstavleniy o zhenskoy krasote // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 67 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14612. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14612.html 3. Bekon F. Novyy Organon. Aforizmy ob istolkovanii prirody i tsarstva cheloveka // Sochineniya. V 2 tt. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. 575 s. 4. Kant I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. Tom 5. M.: Mysl', 1966. 564 s. 5. Trubetskoy N. S. Osnovy fonologii / N.S. Trubetskoy. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoy literatury, 1960. 372, [1] s. 6. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Pod redaktsiey V.S. Stepina: V 4 tt. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 4. 736 s. 7. Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskiy B.A. Uslovnost' v iskusstve / Lotman Yu.M. // Ob iskusstve. SPb.: «Iskusstvo – SPb», 2000. 8. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. 570 s. 9. Demenev D. N. Dialektika iskusstva: monografiya / D.N. Demenev. Magnitogorsk: Izd-vo Magnitogorsk. gos. tekhn. un-ta im. G.I. Nosova, 2015. 146 s. 10. Sulzer J. G. Allgmeine Theorie der schonen Kunste, Bd. II / J. G. Sulzer. Leipzig, 1794. S. 371. 11. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1999. 1472 s. 12. Karlik E. A. Edinaya teoriya svoystv – napravlenie sozdaniya novykh osnov nauki / E. A. Karlik // Ezhemesyachnyy zhurnal Evraziyskogo Soyuza Uchenykh: sb. statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Otv.red. D.P. Karkushin. Moskva, 2014. ¹ 6 (14). Vyp. 6. S. 74-76. 13. Ziegenfuss, W. Di Uberwindung des Geschmacks / W. Ziegenfuss. Potsdam, 1949. S. 113. 14. Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. ¹ 10 (34). S. 21-28. 15. Demenev D. N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2014. ¹ 8. S.109-139. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html (Data obrashcheniya 25.12.2015); 16. Demenev D.N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 8. - C. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.8.13400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html 17. V. S. Zhidkov O spetsifike iskusstva XXI veka // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 22 - 37. 18. Lipskiy V.N. O vzaimootnosheniyakh khudozhnika i vlasti v Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 62 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11961. 19. S. M. Chervonnaya «Realizm bez beregov» Rozhe Garodi i ponyatie granits i beregov v sovetskoy ideologii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 87 - 94. |