Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Pedagogy and education
Reference:

Naumova N.V., Glushak A.S. About Paradigm Principles of Education Reforms (View from Inside)

Abstract: The article gives the analysis of reforms in higher education which were performed in the Russian Federation and also in Israel, the USA and France. The main aim of the article is to clarify paradigm principles, main purposes and objectives of reforms being conducted. Attention is paid to the necessity not to destroy previous achievements and avoid coping the experience of other countries and nations but to save best achievements of our nation in the sphere of education and to multiply them. It is underlined in the article that cutting down humanitarian cycles and socially-oriented blocs will inevitably lead to spiritually poor personality with low potential of social activity. Western European countries orientation on specialist and professional is only one side of education, the other one is educational, spiritually enriching and personality forming side of the process of education. The Western model can be defined as empiric-rational with the stress on professionalism. The main task which is stated is to create a person-function, person of wish. The aim of our system of higher education is to develop an intellectual human-creator. The research methodology is based on the comparative philosophical and religious analysis. The main research method is the comparative analytical method. General scientific methods such as analysis, synthesis, generalization and individualization have been also applied. It is stated in the article that the prospect for our development is the formation of mature personality with philosophical and cultural outlook and breadth of thinking but not a person- “small screw”, not a professional of narrow sphere. Political, ideological and economic problems of the modern world are often concealed in the destruction of the system of education, its orientation not on statement of universal principals and norms but on search of particular, narrow professionally oriented, pragmatic factors of growth. The authors believe that when one conducts reforms he should be moderate which supposes the harmony of common and particular, scientific and humanitarian knowledge and preparation of the person creator and person-professional and performer. It is concluded that pre-revolutionary as well as the Soviet system of education in Russia had humanitarian character of upbringing of intellectual and paid insufficient attention to the formation of professional while the Western model is vice versa has always been considered to be successful in creating professional, person-function but both models have their own disadvantages. Educational reforms are performed everywhere but tasks are different. So, it is important to save everything valuable that our secondary and higher schools have always had. 


Keywords:

personality, professional, human-creator, teacher, humanities, natural sciences, science, education model, paradigm, reform


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. M.V. Mikhaylov Nazvanie: Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya
2. rossiyskoy pravovoy politiki v sfere obrazovaniya // Pravo i politika. 2011. ¹ 11. C. 1808-1813.
3. Zaytseva E.A. Sistema obrazovaniya v Shveytsarii: struktura, preimushchestva i nedostatki // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. ¹ 3. S. 1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8736.2015.3.15145. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_15145.html
4. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Chto takoe filosofiya? / Khose Ortega-i-Gasset; [per. A.B. Zykova]. M.: Nauka, 1991. 408 s.
5. Petrushenko V.L. Iov, ili o chelovecheskom samostoyanii / V.L. Petrushenko. L'vov : Novyy svit-2000, 2008. 340 s.
6. Shishkov I.Z. Kant i krititsistskaya traditsiya. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya perevodchika // Popper K.R. Vse lyudi – filosofy: Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu; Immanuil Kant – filosof Prosveshcheniya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003. 56 s.
7. http://reftrend.ru/559190.html
8. Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kn. 3 / G.V.F. Gegel'; [per. B. Stolpner]. SPb.: Nauka, 1999. 582 s.
9. Gosudarstvennaya programma Rossiyskoy federatsii «Razvitie obrazovaniya» na 2013-2020 gody-http://zakonbase.ru/content/base/272788
10. Kananykina E.S. Sistema frantsuzskogo vysshego obrazovaniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2013. ¹ 8. S. 57-81. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.687. URL: http://ffre.ru/otrqasatypolpolrna.html
11. Kananykina E.S. Sistema britanskogo vysshego obrazovaniya XX stoletiya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 1-17. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.685. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_685.html
12. Ogurtsov A.P., Platonov V.V. Obrazy obrazovaniya. Zapadnaya filosofiya obrazovaniya. XX vek. SPb.: RKhGI, 2004. 520 s.
13. Shkola gumanitarnoy inzhenerii (ShGI im. E.Ben Yekhudy) Kontseptual'nyy proekt-http://www.futurisrael.org/Edu/Z02Rus.htm
14. Cherezova A.S. Bolonskiy protsess: perspektivy rossiyskogo obrazovatel'nogo sektora v edinom prostranstve vysshego obrazovaniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. ¹ 2. C. 175-184. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.2.14486.