Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Yarkova E.N.
Religious culture as an object of cultural studies: the experience of typology
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. ¹ 2.
P. 245-255.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=67508
Yarkova E.N. Religious culture as an object of cultural studies: the experience of typologyAbstract: The object of study is the religious culture as a form of culture. The author examines religious culture as a phenomenon of culture rather, than an epiphenomenon of religion. He allocates such types of religious culture as: traditionalism, utilitarianism, creativism. In his vision of such destructive phenomenon as religious extremism is semantic attribute of traditionalist religious culture. Partially it is overcome in utilitarianism and removed in the religious culture of creativism. Algorithm development of religious culture presented by the author as a dialectic triad, where the thesis is religious culture of traditionalism, antithesis is religious culture of utilitarianism and synthesis is religious culture of creativism.The methodology of research represents a synthesis of such research procedures as: method of semantic and axiological reduction, in which the researcher cutting off external formal aspects of religious culture explicates their internal informative value-semantic characteristics; and method of ideal typing, aiming at the construction of mental models of religious culture, to serve as its tools of cognition.Scientific novelty and originality consists in development of culturology approach to the study of religious culture, aimed at identifying some general types of religious culture. Use as a tool for cultural study generated by the author of the typological triad: traditionalism, utilitarianism, creativism, allows you: to debunk the widespread tendency for categorizing of such destructive phenomenon as religious extremism as attribute of any concrete-historical religion; to identify universal for different religions, the semantics of this destructive phenomenon; to develop certain universal semantic antidotes to semantically neutralized this phenomenon. The author puts forward the idea that semantic antidote traditionalism is utilitarianism, shook traditionalism revived extremism and terrorism, suppressing these destructive phenomena is carried out within the framework of creativism, to eliminate the opposition of traditionalism and utilitarianism. Keywords: religiya, tsennosti, smysly, tsennostno-smyslovaya reduktsiya, traditsionalizm, utilitarizm, kreativizm
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Bulgakov S.N. Dva grada. Issledovanie o prirode obshchestvennykh idealov. SPb. Izdatel'stvo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta, 1997. 589s.
2. Tillikh P. Tsit. izd. S. 226-235. 3. Buber M. Dva obraza very. M.: Respublika, 1995. 464s. 4. E. B. Rashkovskii Religiya i kul'tura v sovremennoi Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 21 - 25. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.2. 5. Berdyaev N.A. Smysl tvorchestva (Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka). M.: Izdatel'stvo G.A.Lemana i S.I.Sakharova,1916. 385s. 6. Bul'tman R. Izbrannoe: Vera i ponimanie. M. «Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya», 2004. 752s. 7. Bart K. Tserkovnaya dogmatika. T. 2. M.: Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2011. 712 s. 8. Post Abu Abdurahman Faruq. The Moderate Religion. Clarification of the Moderate, Balanced Religion Between the Extremes of other Religions and their followers. Makkah Al Mukaramah, 2011. 165p. 9. Porterfield A. Religious Pluralism in Religious Studies// Gods in America: Religious Pluralism in the United States/edited by Charles L. Cohen and Ronald L. Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. pp. 21-42. 10. Whitehead A.N. Process and reality. N.-Y.: Macmillan company, 1967. 546 p. 11. Solov'ev V. S. Sobranie sochinenii. T. 3. SPb.: Knigoizdatel'skoe Tovarishchestvo «Prosveshchenie», 1912. 440 s. 12. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 527s. 13. Kraft J., Basinger D. Religious Tolerance through Humility. Ashgate, 2008. 138p. 14. Yarkova E.N. Utilitarizm kak impul's dinamiki obshchestva. Kruglyi stol uchenykh.//Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1998. ¹6. S. 51-63. 15. Teiyar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka: Sb. ocherkov i esse. M.: Progress, 1965. 296s. 16. Butler P. Foreword: Terrorism and Utilitarianism: Lessons from, and for, Criminal Law// Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2002. Vol.93. ¹ 1. rp.1-22. 17. Mill J.S. Nature, the Utility of Religion and Theism. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1874. 138 p. 18. Paley W. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002. 481p. 19. Basyrov A. Kh. Dzhadidizm: sotsial'no-filosofskii analiz. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk. Ufa, 2009. 17c. 20. Garnak A. Sushchnost' khristianstva: 16 lektsii. M.: INTRADA, 2001 . 191 s. 21. Tsit. po: Istoriya i teoriya ateizma: Ucheb. posobie dlya filos. fak. i otd-nii un-tov/MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova; Redkol.: M. P. Novikov (otv. red.) i dr. 3-izd., dorab. M.: «Mysl'», 1987. 475s. 22. Sm.: Vekhi: sbornik statei o russkoi intelligentsii N.A. Berdyaeva, S.N. Bulgakova, M.O. Gershenzona, A.S. Izgoeva, B.A. Kistyakovskogo, P.B. Struve, S.L. Franka. M.:Izdatel'stvo «Novosti», 1990. 216s. 23. Kharris S. Konets very. Religiya, terror i budushchee razuma. M.: Eksmo, 2011. 488s. 24. Kyrlezhev A. Postsekulyarnaya kontseptualizatsiya religii. K postanovke problemy//Gosudarstvo. Religiya. Tserkov'. 2012. ¹2. S. 52-68. 25. Fromm E. Psikhoanaliz i religiya.//Sumerki bogov. M.: Politizdat, 1989. s. 143-221. 26. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya. T.1. M.: Kanon, 1996. 496s. 27. Vorontsova L.M., Filatov S.B., Furman D.E. Religiya i politika v sovremennom massovom soznanii.//Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1995. ¹ 11. C. 81–91. 28. Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Kul'tura kak sistema. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Yazyki russkoi kul'tury», 1998. 376s. 29. Otto R. Svyashchennoe. Ob irratsional'nom v idee sverkh''estestvennogo i ego sootnoshenii s ratsional'nym. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2008. 274s. 30. Solov'ev V. S. Soch. v 2-kh t. T. 2. Chteniya o Bogochelovechestve. Filosofskaya publitsistika. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Pravda», 1989. 735s. 31. Yablokov N. Osnovy teoreticheskogo religiovedeniya. M.: Kosmopolis, 1994. 224s. 32. Men' A. V. Mirovaya dukhovnaya kul'tura. Lektsii.//http://www.lib.ru/HRISTIAN/MEN/kultura.txt_with-big-pictures.html. 33. Lenin V.I. Sotsializm i religiya// Sbornik proizvedenii V.I. Lenina. M.: Politizdat, 1981. 384s. 34. Arun J. Religion as Culture: Anthropological Critique of de Nobili’s Approach to Religion and Culture//Interculturation of Religion. Critical Perspectives on Robert de Nobili’s Mission in India. Bangalore: Asian Trading Corporation, 2007. p.19-41. 35. Larin Yu.V. Problema sootnosheniya religii i kul'tury//Voprosy kul'turologii. 2015. ¹ 3. S. 28-32. 36. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2003. 603 c.; Ali T. The Clash of Fundamentalism: Crusade, Jihads and Modernity. London: Verso, 2002. 344 p.; Khitchens K. Bog ne lyubov': Kak religiya vse otravlyaet. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn. 2011. 365s. 37. Tillikh P. Izbrannoe: Teologiya kul'tury. M.: Yurist, 1995. 479s. 38. E. B. Rashkovskii Religiya i kul'tura v sovremennoi Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 21 - 25. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.2. |