Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Vinokurov A.Yu. On the issue of the admissibility of consideration of anonymous appeals by prosecution agencies

Abstract: The article studies the consideration of anonymous appeals by prosecution agencies. The object of the research is the range of legal relations, arising when dealing with anonymous appeals, their registration and consideration by prosecution agencies. The author pays special attention to the fact that the current legislation doesn’t prohibit consideration of anonymous appeals, containing information about offences, by prosecution agencies, but the legislation in this sphere should be improved. The author applies the comparative-historical method; he analyzes the provisions of various legal acts and different sources, and comes to the conclusion about the need for a more clear and consistent legal regulation of the legal regime of anonymous appeals, containing information about imminent crimes, the crimes that are being or had been committed, aimed at legal provisions adjustment. 


Keywords:

consideration of appeals, illegal deed, procuracy oversight, prosecutor, offence, infringement of law, source of information, anonymous appeal, jurisdiction, supervision

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. SZ RF. – 2015. – ¹ 13. – St. 1909 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
2. SZ RF. – 2013. – ¹ 23. – St. 2892 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
3. SZ RF. – 2013. – ¹ 19. – St. 2306 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
4. SZ RF. – 2009. – ¹ 39. – St. 4588 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
5. SZ RF. – 2009. – ¹ 39. – St. 4589 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
6. SZ RF. – 1999. – ¹ 28. – St. 3466 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
7. SZ RF. – 2010. – ¹ 27. – St. 3446 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
8. SZ RF. – 1999. – ¹ 42. – St. 4505 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
9. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 33. – St. 3349 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
10. SZ RF. – 2001. – ¹ 52 (ch. 1). – St. 4921 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
11. Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 4.
12. Zakonnost'. – 2008. – ¹ 3.
13. Vinokurov A.Yu. Trebovanie prokurora o provedenii pro-verki // Zakonnost'. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 19-22.
14. SZ RF. – 2008. – ¹ 52 (ch. 1). – St. 6249 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
15. Smushkin A.B. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 2 maya 2006 g. ¹ 59-FZ «O poryadke rassmotreniya obrashcheniy grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // podgotovlen dlya sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus», 2014.
16. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
17. Zakonnost'. – 2008. – ¹ 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
18. SZ RF. – 2009. – ¹ 7. – St. 776 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
19. Glushko E.K. Federal'nyy zakon ot 2 maya 2006 g. ¹ 59-FZ «O po-ryadke rassmotreniya obrashcheniy grazhdane Rossiyskoy Federatsii»: postateynyy kommen-tariy // Ezhegodnik Tsentra publichno-pravovykh issledovaniy. Tom 2. – M.: ANO «Tsentr publichno-pravovykh issledovaniy», 2007.
20. Ivanova E. Anonimnye «mstiteli» // EZh-Yurist. – 2008.-¹ 2.
21. SZ RF. – 2006. – ¹ 19. – St. 2060 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
22. Svod zakonov SSSR. – T. 1. – S. 373.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.