Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Krutalevich A.N. Structure-Analytical Approach to Studying Subcultures

Abstract: The author identifies the structural components of the subculture that determine the prospects of its development and influence on common culture: philosophical, creative, social and political bases thereof. The number of efficient bases of subculture is directly proportional to the period of life of the subculture and its influence. There are three major steps of subcultural activities: "being involved in the subculture", "subcultural initiation", and "return", each stage also has particular substages. The structure of subcultural activity is compared to the evolution of the individual. The article provides a description and functions of the main archetypical roles of the participants in subcultural activities: the Hero, the Mentor, the Threshold Guardian, the Herald, the Shapeshifter, the Shadow, the Ally and the Trickster. Methodological basis of the research includes the theory of historical-cultural types offered by Nikolay Danilevsky, Vladimir Propp's, John Campbell's and Christopher Vogler's comparative typological method. The structure-analytical approach to studying subcultures allows to explore subcultural activity over time. In the end, the developed approach provides a complete portrait of the subculture that includes not only a broad description, but also analysis of its influence on human (individual representative) and cultural system.

Keywords:

Trickster, Shadow, Ally, Herald, Threshold Guardian, Hero, Mentor, mythologem of the journey, bases of subculture, Shapeshifter

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Alekseev-Apraksin A.M. Krosskul'turnye kontakty: turizm i palomnichestvo / A.M. Alekseev-Apraksin // Studia Culturae. – 2013. – ¹ 18. – S. 29-34.
2. Baeva, L.V. Filosofiya patsifizma i ekstremizma v molodezhnykh dvizheniyakh: nauchno-populyarnoe izdanie / L.V. Baeva. – Astrakhan', 2014. – 250 s.
3. Vislenko, A.L. Kollektivnoe soznanie v kul'ture. Dis. ... d-ra filosof. nauk / Vislenko Andrey Leonidovich. – SPb, 2015.-366 s.
4. Vogler, K. Puteshestvie pisatelya. Mifologicheskie struktury v literature i kino / Kristofer Vogler ; Per. s angl. – M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2015. – 476 s.
5. Danilevskiy, N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa / Sostavlenie i kommentarii Yu.A. Belova / Otv. red. O. Platonov. – M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2008. – 816 s.
6. Zharkova, M.A. Tipologizatsiya molodezhnykh subkul'tur v ramkakh postmodernistskogo analiza molodezhnykh subpotokov v Rossiyskom obshchestve / M.A. Zharkova // Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. – T. 15. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 330-384.
7. Kempbell, Dzh. Tysyachelikiy geroy / Dzhozef Kempbell. – Moskva: REFL-BUK, 1997. – 230 s.
8. Levikova, S.I. Neformal'naya molodezhnaya subkul'tura / S.I. Levikova. – M.: VUZovskaya kniga, 2010. – 616 s.
9. Omel'chenko, E. Pokolenie Text: novye imena molodezhnoy kul'tury / Elena Omel'chenko // Reklamnye idei. – 2008. – ¹ 2. – S. 106-111.
10. Propp, V.Ya. Morfologiya «volshebnoy skazki». Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki (Sobranie trudov V.Ya. Proppa) / V.Ya. Propp / Kommentarii E.M. Meletinskogo, A.V. Rafaevoy. Sostavlenie, nauchnaya redaktsiya, tekstologicheskiy kommentariy I.V. Peshkova. – M.: Labirint, 1998. – 512 s.
11. Slyusarevskiy, N.N. Subkul'tura kak ob'ekt issledovaniya / N.N. Slyusarevskiy // Sotsiologiya: Teoriya, metody, marketing. – Kiev, 2002. – ¹ 3. – S. 117-127.
12. Shchepanskaya, T.B. Sistema: teksty i traditsii subkul'tury / T.B. Shchepanskaya. – M.: OGI, 2004. – 288 s.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.