Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Chuval'skaya I.P. Institution of responsibility before the law of the European Union as a category of modern international law

Abstract: This work expounds the nature of the institution of responsibility before the law of the European Union as a category of modern international law. The object of this research is the legal basis of establishing the institutions of responsibility of the states in the modern international law of the EU, as well as the questions of their functionality. The subject of this research is the key positions of the doctrine of international law pertaining to state responsibility, founding treaties of international organizations of UN and EU; additional normative acts that regulate specific issues of state responsibility within the EU; international treaties that bind the positions on responsibility within international law; international traditions that regulate cooperation of the EU member-states inside the organization, as well as outside of it; legal practice that has formed in the sphere of ensuring the adherence to the economic obligations. In the course of the research the author determines that the institutions of responsibility by the law of the EU form an intrinsic part of the universal system of international responsibility of states in the general parameters of the global community. The author’s contribution into the research of this topic is the detailed description of the mechanisms of enforcing the responsibility of the member-states, making a special accent on the role of the institution of responsibility of the states before the law of the European Union.


Keywords:

Institution of responsibility, EU law, Modern international law, Principle of state responsibility, Legal precedent, Prosecution, Mechanism, Faithful compliance with obligations, UN charter, EU founding treaties


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Dogovor o funktsionirovanii Evropeyskogo Soyuza (Rim, 25 marta 1957 g.) (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora 2007 g.) Konsolidirovannyy tekst//SPS «Garant»: http://base.garant.ru/2566558/#ixzz3UqS8cxuC;
2. Sm.: Evropeyskoe publichnoe pravo: monografiya / Lando D.D., Samarin V.I.-M.: Prospekt, 2015. – S. 112;
3. Reshenie Suda ES ot 12 aprelya 2005g. po delu ¹ S-265/03 «Simutenkov protiv Ministerstva obrazovaniya i kul'tury i Federatsii futbola Ispanii»// http://eulaw.ru/translation/simutenkov;
4. Lissabonskiy dogovor, izmenyayushchiy Dogovor o Evropeyskom Soyuze i Dogovor ob uchrezhdenii Evropeyskogo Soobshchestva (Lissabon, 13 dekabrya 2007 g.) (2007/S 306/01). Dogovor vstupil v silu 1 dekabrya 2009 g. //SPS «Garant»: http://base.garant.ru/2566561/#ixzz3UqQppHzd;
5. Reshenie Suda ES ot 15 iyulya 1964 g. po delu ¹ 6/64 «Flaminio Kosta [Flaminio Costa], i ENEL (ENEL') [ENEL (Ente Nazionale Energia Elettrica)], byvshee predpriyatie Edison Vol'ta»// http://eulaw.ru/translation/1964/6;
6. Sm. na etot schet: Pravo evropeyskogo soyuza. Novyy etap evolyutsii: 2009–2017 gody/ Pod red. Entina L.M.-M.: Izd-vo «Aksiom», 2009. – S. 38;
7. Dogovor o Evropeyskom Soyuze (Maastrikht, 7 fevralya 1992 g.) (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora 2007 g.) Dogovor vstupil v silu 1 noyabrya 1993 g. Konsolidirovannyy tekst//SPS «Garant»: http://base.garant.ru/2566557/#ixzz3UqQRsDjd;
8. Valančius, V., et. al. Procesas Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo teisme: preliminarus nutarimas [Procedure in the Court of Justice of the European Communities: preliminary ruling]. Vilnius: Teisinės informacijos centras, 2006, p. 39–40;
9. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal, C 2008, No. 115-1;
10. Arndt, H. W.; Fischer, K. Europarecht. 9 Auflage. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2008, p. 190;
11. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti .-M.: Volters Kluver, 2004, s. 64;
12. Ohlinger, T.; Potacs, M. Gemeinschaftsrecht und Staatliches Recht. Die Anwendung des Europasrechts im Innerstaatlichen Bereich. 3 aktualisierte Auflage. Wien: Lexis Nexis, 2006, p. 195;
13. Biryukov M. M. Evropeyskoe pravo. Kratkiy kurs. — M.: Diplomaticheskaya akademiya MID Rossii, 2003, s. 69;
14. Conway, G. Breaches of EC Law and the International Responsibility of Member States. European Journal of International Law. 2002, 13(3): 679–695;
15. Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries, supra note 6;
16. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2004. – S.95;
17. Vertlib F.O. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv za neispolnenie mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh obyazatel'stv: Monografiya. – M., 2010., C. 22;
18. Wolfrum, R. Reparation for Internationally Wrongful Acts. In: Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Volume four. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 2000, p. 1398–1403;
19. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2004. – S. 60;
20. S.Yu. Kashkin. Pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza: Uchebnik dlya vuzov/ Pod red. S.Yu. Kashkina. – M.: Yurist', 2004. – S. 123;
21. Harlow, C. Francovich ant the Problem of the Disobedient State. European Law Review. 1996, 2: 199–225;
22. Shwarzenberger G. The Dynamics of International Law. London, 1976. P.8,56;
23. Oppenheim L. International Law / Ed. H. Lauterpacht. London, 1958. Vol.1. P. 345-347;
24. Kalamkaryan R.A. Gospodstvo prava Rule of Law v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. M., 2004. S. 256-269;
25. Cheng B. General principles of law as applied by international courts and tribunals. London,1953 P. 121-136;
26. Ona zhe. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave / Pravovedenie. 1979. ¹ 6. S. 85-96;
27. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2004. – S. 85;
28. Sm. Dmitrieva G.K. Stanovlenie printsipa nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya pravom / Sovetskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava.1987. M., 1988.S.114,117;
29. Jennings H.T. The international Courtof Justice after fifty years/ American Journal of International Law. 1995. Vol 89.N3.P.493-506;
30. S.Yu. Kashkin. Pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza: Uchebnik dlya vuzov/ Pod red. S.Yu. Kashkina. – M.: Yurist', 2004. – S. 122;
31. Kalamkaryan R.A. Mezhdunarodnyy sud v miroporyadke na osnove gospodstva prava. M., 2012.S.7-65; Kalamkaryan R.A. Gospodstvo prava Rule of Law v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. M., 2004.S. 451-494;
32. Avtonomov A.S. Prava cheloveka, pravozashchitnaya i pravookhranitel'naya deyatel'nost'. M.,2009. S 237-243;
33. Tiunov O.I., Kashirkhina A.A., Morozov A.N. Vypolnenie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2011.S 29-38;
34. Kovalev A.A. Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita prav cheloveka. M., 2013.S.67-76;
35. Sidorova E.V. Kompleksnoe pravovoe regulirovanie. M. 2015.S.10-94;
36. Sm. na etot schet: Chernichenko S.V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 2014. S.101-123;
37. Vliyanie evropeyskogo prava na konstitutsionnoe pravo gosudarstv Tsentral'noy i Vostochnoy Evropy: monografiya / Gagaeva E.A., Dudko I.G.-M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – S.46-48;
38. Vertlib F. O. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv za neispolnenie mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh obyazatel'stv. Monografiya, izd. Yulitinform, Seriya: Biblioteka mezhdunarodnogo prava: M.,2011, s.54;
39. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal, C 2008, No. 115-1.