Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Epanchintseva G.A., Barkovskaya A.P. Comprehension of the Phenomenon of Cruelty During Classical and Post-Classical Periods of Development of Psychology

Abstract: The authors of the present research has conducted the comparative theoretical analysis of cruelty. It is revealed that views on the nature and origin of violence has been changing significantly throughout times. The authors describe differences in views on cruelty during the classical and post-classical periods of the development of psychology . The authors have also identified some specific factors that contribute to the formation and manifestation of violence. By analyzing the results of various researches, the authors show the distinctive features of cruelty from similar phenomena such as rage, aggression and hatred. The authors also consider the influence of genetic features and acquired social factors on the formation and manifestation of cruelty. It is revealed that cruelty is not only a permanent or situational quality, a variety of reasons and factors of different nature and content influences it. The main methods of the research of the phenomenon of violence in this article were: theoretical analysis, psychological and comparative analysis and classification of the conceptual framework. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors have reviewed and reconceived a number of concepts of cruelty. The authors have also described and analyzed internal and external factors that lead to cruelty. Based on the theoretical analysis of cruelty the authors emphasize the need to clarify the meaning and significance of this concept for a more thorough identification of numerous terminological differences in the use of the term "cruelty".

Keywords:

violence, gloat, psychology, personality, cruelty, aggression, hatred, rage, ruthlessness, sadism

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Samokhina A. A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya deformatsiya kak prichina delinkventnogo povedeniya // Prikladnaya psikhologiya. – 2000. – ¹ 3. – S. 46-55.
2. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. / Pod red. D. N. Ushakova. – M.: Gos. in-t «Sov. entsikl.»; OGIZ; Gos. izd-vo inostr. i nats. slov, 1935-1940. – 347s.
3. Davletchina S.B. Slovar' po konfliktologii. Ulan-Ude: VSGTU. – 2005. – 100 s.
4. Zhmurov, V. A. Bol'shaya entsiklopediya po psikhiatrii / V. A. Zhmurov. – 2-e izd. – M.: Dzhangar, 2012. – 864 s.
5. Tkhostov A.Sh., Surnov K.G. Vliyanie sovremennykh tekhnologii na razvitie lichnosti i formirovanie patologicheskikh form adaptatsii: obratnaya storona sotsializatsii // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. – 2005. T. 26. ¹ 6. – S. 53-58.
6. Dal' V.I. Tolkovyi slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t. M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr «TERRA», 1994, t.3. – 560 s.
7. Abdullaev Sh.M., Abdullaeva D.S. Zhestokost' kak psikhosotsial'nyi fenomen // Psikhologiya XXI veka: Sbornik material V mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh: v 2 t. – SPb.: Leningradskii gosudarstvennyi universitet im. A.S. Pushkina. – 2009. – T. 1. – S. 14-19.
8. Ratinov A. R. Sudebnaya psikhologiya dlya sledovatelei. M.: Yurlitinform, 2001. – 352 s.
9. Bandura A. Teoriya sotsial'nogo naucheniya. – SPb.: Evraziya, 2000.– 320s.
10. Balabanova L.M. Sudebnaya patopsikhologiya: Voprosy opredeleniya normy i otklonenii / L.M. Balabanova. – D.: Stalker, 1998. – 432s.
11. Berkowitz L. (1964). Aggressive cues in aggressive behavior and hostility catharsis // Psychological Review 71 104-122p.
12. Gannushkin P.B. Sladostrastie, zhestokost' i religiya // Izb. tr. M., 1964. – 292 s.
13. Chernova G.R. Zhestokost' kak fenomen kul'tury: Monografiya. SPb.: LGU im. A.S. Pushkina, 2005. – 96 s.
14. Epanchintseva G.A. Antropologicheskii podkhod i psikhodiagnosticheskie pozitsii v psikhologii // Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal. – 2009. – ¹12. – S. 288-295
15. Kh'ell L., Zigler D. Teorii lichnosti (osnovnye polozheniya, issledovaniya i primenenie). SPb.: Piter Press, 1997. – 608 s.
16. Barkovskaya A.P. K probleme filosofskogo ponimaniya zhestokosti//Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. – 2015. – ¹ 2.Chast' 7. – S. 1513-1517.
17. Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost' – M.: Politizdat, 1975. – S. 104-105s.
18. Guggenbyul' Allan. Zloveshchee ocharovanie nasiliya: profilaktika detskoi agressivnosti i zhestokosti / Guggenbyul', Allan ; A. Guggenbyul' ; per. s nem. N. Skoroduma. – 2-e izd. – : Kogito-Tsentr, 2006. – 176 s.
19. Epanchintseva G.A. O novykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya psikhodiagnostiki // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. – 2002. – ¹ 4.Chast' 7. – S. 199.
20. Bandura A. (1973). Institutionally sanctioned violence // Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 2 23-24p.
21. Barkovskaya A.P., Epanchintseva G.A. K probleme podrostkovoi zhestokosti // Universitetskii kompleks kak regional'nyi tsentr obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii (c mezhdunarodnym uchastiem). – Orenburg, 2015. – S. 2023-2025s.
22. Lorents K. Tak nazyvaemoe zlo. K estestvennoi istorii agressii // Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M.: Respublika, 1998. – 363 s.
23. Walter G., Nau J., Oud N. Aggression und Aggressionsmanagement. – Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, 2012. – 619 r.
24. Khorni K. Nashi vnutrennie konflikty. Konstruktivnaya teoriya nevroza – SPb.: Lan', 1997. – 240 s.
25. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoi destruktivnosti. – M.: AST, 2010. – 224 s.
26. Khekkhauzen Kh. Agressiya // Motivatsiya i deyatel'nost': v 2 t. M.: Pedagogika, 1986. – T. 1. – S. 365 – 405.
27. Freid 3. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya // Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo. Sbornik proizvedenii. – M.: Prosveshchenie, 1990. – 38 – 424 s.
28. Beron R., Richardson D. Agressiya. – SPb.: Piter, 1997. – 336 s.
29. Antonyan Yu.M. Zhestokost' v nashei zhizni – M.: INFRA-M, 1995 . – 320 c.
30. Antonyan Yu.M. Ubiistva radi ubiistva / Yu.M. Antonyan. M.: Izd-vo «Shchit-M»,1998. – 233s.
31. Kol'tsov M. V. Zhestokost' kak strukturnyi komponent agressivnosti // Aspirant, ili Molodoe pokolenie uchenykh o…: nauchno-prakticheskii al'manakh aspirantskogo soobshchestva. – 6. – Orenburg: Izd-vo OGPU, 2012. – S.115-122.
32. Rumyantseva T. G. Ponyatie agressivnosti v sovremennoi zarubezhnoi psikhologii // Voprosy psikhologii. – 1991. – ¹ 1. – S. 81-87.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.