Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. On the issue of personal traits of a subject of an administrative offence

Abstract: The subject of the research is a range of legal and organizational problems of administrative-legal regulation of identification of a subject of an administrative offence. The authors carry out a theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of legal regulation of the subject of an administrative offence characterizing. The article presents the authors’ positions on the notion of administrative-legal prevention of offences and ascertainment of personal and professional qualities of the subject of administrative offence. Special attention is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative-legal regulation of offences prevention. The authors carry out a theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of preventive activities in the sphere of administrative-legal regulation. The article presents the authors’ positions on the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal logical) and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The authors conclude that at present it is necessary to enhance forms and methods of ascertainment of personal and professional qualities of a subject of an offence in order to provide law and order in the sphere of administrative law application. The main contribution of the authors is the declaration of the need to develop administrative-legal regulation of the revelation of potential subjects of administrative offences. The novelty of the research lies in the proposals about the development of forms and methods of administrative-legal regulation of preventive activities and the creation of legal and organizational guarantees of legality in Russia.  


Keywords:

motivation, coercion, sanction, punishment, delict, offence, trait, offender, personality, guilt


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
2. Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
3. Dyuzhaev A.V. Retsidiv administrativnykh pravonarusheniy: Dis… kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1978.
4. Lichnost' prestupnika. M., 1971. S. 77.
5. Kondrashkov N.N. Kolichestvennye metody v kriminologii. M., 1971. S. 160.
6. Gertsenzon A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo i sotsiologiya. M., 1970. S. 144.
7. Dyakin V.Ya. Preduprezhdenie organami vnutrennikh del administrativnykh pravonarusheniy, posyagayushchikh na obshchestvennyy poryadok: Dis…kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1990.
8. Dubinin N.P., Karpets I.I., Kudryavtsev V.N. Genetika. Povedenie. Otvetstvennost'. M., 1982. S. 151.
9. Zelentsov A.B. Konflikty v upravlenii i upravlenie konfliktami: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya predmeta i form administrativnoy yurisdiktsii. – M., 2001. S. 178.
10. Zelentsov A.B. Konflikty v upravlenii i upravlenie konfliktami: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya predmeta i form administrativnoy yurisdiktsii. M., 2001. S. 172.
11. Kudryavtsev V.N. Yuridicheskiy konflikt // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995, ¹ 9. S. 10.
12. Kudryavtsev V.N., Remnev V.I. Izuchenie dinamiki pravonarusheniy i ee prichiny // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1984. ¹ 8. S. 24.
13. Lozbyakov V.I., Ovchinskiy S.S. Administrativno-pravovye mery preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti. M., 1978. S. 31.
14. Volkov B.S. Motivy prestupleniy. Kazan'. 1982.
15. Luneev V.V. Motivatsiya prestupnogo povedeniya. M., 1984. S. 103.
16. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii. M., 1984. S. 204.
17. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 192.
18. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 191.
19. Stefanov N. Obshchestvennye nauki i sotsial'naya tekhnologiya. M., 1976. S. 99.
20. Platonov K.K. Psikhologicheskaya struktura lichnosti / V kn.: Lichnost' pri sotsializme. M., 1974. S. 69
21. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 189.
22. Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Dis…d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 107.
23. Kriminal'naya motivatsiya // Pod obshch. red. V.N. Kudryavtseva. M. «Nauka», 1986. S. 103.
24. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995. S. 34.
25. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995. – S. 34.
26. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 191.
27. Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya. M., 1982. S. 198.
28. Kratkiy slovar' po sotsiologii / Pod red. D.M. Gvishiani, N.I. Lapina (sost. E.M. Korzheva, N.F. Naumova). M., 1989. S. 142.