Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Vinokurov A.Yu. On some issues of legal regulation of public prosecutor’s office bodies of the CIS member-states in the sphere of administrative prosecution

Abstract: The subject of the research covers the peculiarities of legal regulation of the activities of public prosecutor’s office bodies of the CIS member-states in the sphere of administrative prosecution. This paper is the first stage of a comparative-legal study and is devoted to the analysis of the provisions of status legislative acts of the countries of the post-Soviet space (except for the Baltic states), regulating the issues of organization and activity of the public prosecutor’s office bodies and the model law on the public prosecutor’s office. The author emphasizes the provisions which are similar for the public prosecutor’s offices of different countries and outlines the distinct features of a public prosecutor’s office of each country. The methodology of the research is based on the comparative-legal and partially on the historical method which allow the author to reveal the similarities and differences in realization of administrative prosecution functions by the public prosecutor’s offices of different countries of the CIS. The author carries out the comparative-legal analysis of the provisions of laws on public prosecutor’s office of the CIS countries in the area of consolidatioin of the prosecutors’ responsibilities in the sphere of administrative offences revelation. The author concludes that the prosecutors in the CIS member-states have similar and unique responsibilities in the sphere of administrative prosecution depending on a model of public prosecutor’s office development of each country.

Keywords:

involvement in the process, decision, administrative prosecution, administrative offence, administrative proceeding, administrative and jurisdictional process

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
2. www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy internet-portal Respubliki Belarus'. Data obra-shcheniya – 20.04.2015.
3. www.prokuror.kg. Ofitsial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury Kyrgyzskoy Res-publiki. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
4. Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
5. Golos Ukrainy ot 25.10.2014 ¹ 206.
6. Bidomosti Verkhovnoi Radi. – 1991. – ¹ 53. – St. 793 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
7. Akhbori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2005. – ¹ 7. – St. 398 (s po-sled. izmeneniyami).
8. Eto sozvuchno podkhodu, ranee imevshemu zakreplenie v st. 230 «Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov pri proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravo-narusheniyakh» KoAP RSFSR. A v deystvuyushchey st. 25.1 KoAP RF takie polnomochiya kha-rakterizuyut prokurora kak uchastnika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pra-vonarusheniyakh.
9. Law.vl.ru. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
10. Online.zakon.kz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
11. Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta Respubliki Uzbekistan. – 1993. – ¹ 1. – St. 29 (s posled. izmeneniyami). Utverzhden v novoy redaktsii Zakonom Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 29.08.2001 ¹ 257-II «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon Respubliki Uzbeki-stan ″O prokurature″» // lex.uz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
12. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
13. Model'nyy zakon o prokurature: prinyat postanovleniem Mezhparlamentskoy Assamblei gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG ot 16.11.2006 ¹ 27-6 // Informatsionnyy byul-leten'. Mezhparlamentskaya Assambleya gosudarstv – uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisi-mykh Gosudarstv. – 2007. – ¹ 39 (ch. 1). – S. 317-362.
14. Stat'i 1, 22, 25 i 26 Zakona o prokurature.
15. Kolotilo A.O. Status prokurora v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v Rossii i Ukraine // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 12. Podcherknem, chto samo po sebe uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii sudami takikh del ne yavlyaetsya chast'yu realiza-tsii funktsii administrativnogo presledovaniya, sostavlyaya soderzhanie takoy traditsion-no izvestnoy funktsii kak uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii del sudami (sm.: Vinokurov A.Yu. Ukaz. rab. – S. 55).
16. Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Zaytsev O.A. Prokuratura v stranakh SNG (pravovoy status, funktsii, polnomochiya): nauchnoe i uchebnoe posobie / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Ekzamen, 2007; Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Frolova M.A. Polnomochiya organov prokuratury gosudarstva – uchastnikov SNG: monografiya / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013.
17. Subanova N.V. K voprosu ob osushchestvlenii prokuraturoy funktsii administra-tivnogo presledovaniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2015. – ¹
18. – S. 67-73. 4. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod red. Yu.E. Vinokurova. – 12-e izdanie. – M.: Yurayt. 2015. – S. 286-303.
19. Vinokurov A.Yu. Administrativnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Ros-siyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 52-56.
20. Razorenov K.I. Funktsiya administrativnogo presledovaniya v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2011; Tyurina A.A. Funktsiya zashchity v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2007.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.