Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Feshchenko V.S. Historical and artistic significance of neo-Byzantine style in the temple paintings of M.M. Vasilyev

Abstract: The subject of this study are temple paintings, drawn in neo-Byzantine style in the late XIX - early XX century by M.M. Vasiliev. Master's artistic original is unique among pictural samples presented to the Byzantine mode of execution. This work is supposed integral to shed light on biographical facts and stages of the creative path of the artist, as well by the examples of some works of art, to conduct analysis of the features brushwork by M.M. Vasilyev in comparison with samples of neo-Byzantine style in the works of V.M. Vasnetsov.Based on the undeniable Spirit-bearing samples temple painting Byzantine X-XII centuries and their social and artistic significance, research methodology of this study is a comparative analysis of the painting MM Vasilyev style neo-Byzantine style, generated by V.M. Vasnetsov. Critical appraisal of these artists works will contribute to the identification of essentially ideological importance and the effectiveness of their approaches of mode of execution wich are necessary for the upliftment of the society within the temple environment. The result of investigation of neo-Byzantine style of painting is supposed to separate M.M. Vasiliev creative approach from the conventional concept of "Vasnetsov school", as between them there are fundamental differences in the interpretation of images and compositions. Also, it seems appropriate to define a circle collaborated with M.M. Vasiliev, artists, which includes A.P. Blaznov, F.M. Vahrushev, F.R. Railean, L.A. Pyanovsky et al.Mural temples accomplished with Vasiliev, marked by deep penetration into the medieval image. Without departing from current trends, the master saves ideological Vasnetsov national direction, simultaneously breaking, subordinating and an introduction to the idea of communion with God Nouveau style. For contemporary art is genuine, what distinguishes painting Vasiliev and artists of his circle, can be a, figuratively speaking, the ragged ends of the thread, which stretched to the modern religious art, it will be possible to revive the friendly, lively, creative language of temple imagery, nwithout philosophize and not mindlessly copying but creating freely and truely.


Keywords:

academic, Byzantine style of writing, Vasnetsov style, Temple painting, neo-Byzantine style, ideological searches, art history, Nouveau, iconographic convention, theological theory of image


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. A. V. Makeenkova Fenomeny «klassicheskogo» i «sovremennogo» v istorii izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-2.-C. 215-227. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.02.10.
2. TsGA VMF SSSR. F. 227. Op. 1. D. 307. S. 56 ot 9 iyunya 1913 g. O nagrazhdenii podarkami khudozhnikov, prinimavshikh uchastie v sooruzhenii Morskogo sobora v Kronshtadte.
3. Uspenskiy L.A. Bogoslovie ikony Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi. – 2-e izd. – M.: Dar', 2008.
4. RGIA. F. 789. Op.
5. D. 79 (1888 g.). 11.Solntse Rossii: ezhenedel'nyy zhurnal. – 1913. ¹ 32.
6. Kolpakova G.S. Iskusstvo Drevney Rusi: Domongol'skiy period. – SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2007.
7. Krest'yaninov V.Ya., Gamlitskiy A.V., Zav'yalova A.E., Savel'ev Yu.R., Sokolov A.R. Kronshtadtskiy Morskoy sobor vo imya svyatitelya Nikolaya Chudotvortsa. – SPb.: Liki Rossii, Fond «Spas», 2013.
8. Petrov-Vodkin K.S. Pis'ma. Stat'i. Vystupleniya. Dokumenty / sost. sb., vstup. st. i komment. E.N. Selizarovoy. – M.: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, 1991.
9. Zabelin S.N. Russkie tserkvi v Evrope // Rossiyskiy Arkhiv: Istoriya Otechestva v svidetel'stvakh i dokumentakh XVIII–XX vv.: al'manakh. – M.: Studiya TRITE: Ros. Arkhiv, 1999. – S. 589–600. – [T.] IX [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://runivers.ru/new_htmlreader/?book=5613&chapter=84445 (data obrashcheniya 05.01.12)
10. Kolpakova G.S. Iskusstvo Vizantii: Ranniy i sredniy periody. – SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2004.
11. Kishkinova E.M. «Vizantiyskoe vozrozhdenie» v arkhitekture Rossii. Seredina XIX – nachalo XX veka. – SPb: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2007.
12. Gusakova V.O. Viktor Vasnetsov i religiozno-natsional'noe napravlenie v russkoy zhivopisi kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka. – SPb.: Avrora, 2008.
13. Gamlitskiy A.V. Rospis' Kronshtadtskogo morskogo sobora // XI Filevskie chteniya: materialy nauchnoy konferentsii. 24–26 dekabrya 2012, Moskva [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://archi.ru/lib/publication.html?id=1850569962&fl=5&sl=1 (data obrashcheniya 18.09.2013).
14. Gorokhov V.A., Krest'yaninov V.Ya. Kronshtadtskiy Morskoy sobor // Istoricheskiy al'manakh. – SPb.: Tsitadel', 1997. – ¹ 6.