Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Ponomareva K.A. European legal determinants of the national tax law

Abstract: The research considers the following issues: theories, concepts of European tax law on direct and indirect taxation; norms of the national financial law and the European law governing direct and indirect taxation in the EU Member States; the practice of EU Court of Justice in disputes relating to the matters of taxation, tax harmonization and tax sovereignty. The work points to several important things which represent the starting point for European integration in the field of tax law, in particular: tax harmonization in direct and indirect taxes, prohibition of discrimination and restrictions of the conference, as well as the leading role of fundamental freedoms for European integration. The EU Court decisions which became paradigmatic in the European tax law are given as examples of judicial practice. The methodological basis consists of general scientific methods (dialectical materialistic, systemic, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis), and legal research methods. At the heart of the study is a comparative legal method allowing to identify legal issues that exist in the European legislation as well as to find the best ways to solve them. The research also employs specific methods: legalistic, historical and legal. On the basis of the latest EU legislation and court practice in the EU, a comprehensive comparative legal study of tax harmonization in the field of direct and indirect taxes within the EU was carried out. The positive and negative integration is a tool used by the European Union to eliminate tax frontiers within the common market. Today’s achievements in harmonization of indirect taxes are obvious. The unification in the field of direct taxes has so far succeeded in a lesser degree, but thanks to such important directives as prohibition of discrimination of fundamental freedoms, the Court of Justice has created a number of important precedents that have become sources of the European tax law. The fact of the sovereignty of Member States significantly influences interpreting and enforcement matters in the field of direct taxes. It would be optimal to find a position within the Union in the middle between unlimited policy to reduce taxes and complete association of tax rates. It could start the harmonization of the tax base for taxation of enterprises.  


Keywords:

European tax law, direct taxes, indirect taxes, tax harmonization, European Court of Justice, court practice, tax sovereignty, comparative law, European Union, Directive


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Dogovor o Evropeyskom Soyuze (Maastrikht, 7 fevralya 1992 g.) (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora 2007 g.) Konsolidirovannyy tekst // SPS «Garant».
2. Dogovor o funktsionirovanii Evropeyskogo Soyuza (Rim, 25 marta 1957 g.) (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora 2007 g.) Konsolidirovannyy tekst // SPS «Garant».
3. Direktiva N 2008/9/ES Soveta Evropeyskogo Soyuza «O detal'nykh pravilakh vozmeshcheniya naloga na dobavlennuyu stoimost', predusmotrennogo Direktivoy 2006/112/ES, nalogoplatel'shchikam, uchrezhdennym ne v gosudarstve-chlene ES, predostavlyayushchem vozmeshchenie, a v drugom gosudarstve-chlene ES» [rus., angl.] (Prinyata v g. Bryussele 12.02.2008) (s izm. i dop. ot 14.10.2010).
4. Tolstopyatenko G.P. Evropeyskoe nalogovoe pravo (problemy teorii i praktiki): Diss. … doktora yurid. nauk.-M.: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy institut mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (universitet) MID RF, 2001.-317 s.
5. Adamczyk, The Sources of EU Law Relevant for Direct Taxation, in Lang u. a. (Hrsg.), Introduction to European Tax Law: Direct Taxation, 2. Aufl. 2010.
6. Cordewener, Europäische Grundfreiheiten und nationales Steuerrecht, 2002, S. 950 ff.
7. Grabitz/Hilf/Nettesheim, Das Recht der Europäischen Union, 50. EL 2013, Art. 113 AEUV, Rn. 9 f.;
8. Hindelang, Steffen; Köhler, Hannes: Europarechtliche Determinanten nationalen Steuerrechts: in: WHI-Paper 06/2013: http://www.whi-berlin.eu/whi-papers-2013.html
9. Höfstätter/Hohenwarter-Mayr, The Merger Directive, in: Lang u. a. (Hrsg.), Introduction to European Tax Law: Direct Taxation, 2. Aufl. 2010, S. 149 f.;
10. Lampert, Perspektiven der Rechtsangleichung auf dem Gebiet der direkten Steuern in der Europäischen Union, EuZW 2013, 493, 495;
11. Lang u. a. (Hrsg.), Introduction to European Tax Law: Direct Taxation, 2. Aufl. 2010, S. 75.
12. Lehner (Hrsg.), Steuerrecht im Europäischen Binnenmarkt, 1996,
13. Oppermann/Classen/Nettesheim, Europarecht, 5. Aufl. 2011.
14. Terra/Wattel, European Tax Law, 3. Aufl. 2001, S. 22 f.;
15. Weber-Grellet, Europäisches Steuerrecht, 2005, S. 43.
16. EuGH v. 11.07.74, Rs. 8/74, Rn. 5 – Dassonville;
17. EuGH v. 03.12.74, Rs. 33/74, Rn. 10 ff. – van Binsbergen;
18. EuGH v. 28.01.86, 270/83, Rn. 24 – avoir fiscal,
19. EuGH v. 28.01.92, Rs. C-204/90, Rn. 28 – Bachmann;
20. EuGH v. 14.02.95, C-279/93, Rn. 32 – Schumacker.
21. EuGH v. 30.11.95, Rs C-55/94, Rn. 37 – Gebhard;
22. EuGH v. 15.12.95, Rs. C-415/93, Rn. 91 – Bosman;
23. EuGH v. 21.09.99, C-307/97, Rn. 51 – Saint-Gobain;
24. EuGH v. 04.06.2002, Rs. C-503/99, Rn. 20 – Goldene Aktien Belgien.
25. EuGH v. 07.09.04, Rs. C-319/02, Rn. 49 – Manninen.
26. EuGH v. 13.12.05, Rs. C-446/03, Rn. 36 – Marks & Spencer.
27. EuGH v. 12.12.06, Rs. C-374/04, Rn. 55-Test Claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation.
28. BVerfG, Urt. v. 30.06.2009, 2 BvE 2/08, 2 BvR 1010/08, 2 BvR 1022/08, 2 BvR 1259/08, 2 BvR 182/09, BVerfGE 123, 267, Rn. 249, 252.