Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Voznyakevich, E. E.
The Problem of the Disciplinary Unity of the History of Science
// Philosophy and Culture.
2015. ¹ 1.
P. 50-55.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66110
Voznyakevich, E. E. The Problem of the Disciplinary Unity of the History of ScienceAbstract: The subject research of the present article is the balance between science studies, historical methodology of science and philosophy of the history of science when studying the genesis of scientific knowledge. Offering different approaches to the development of the research targets, each of these disciplines sets its own methodological framework for both researches and validation criteria and therefore several models of the development of scientific knowledge with different groups of factors are being implemented. Nevertheless, in order to perform pragmatic functions such as the creation and substantiation of scientific policy, it is necessary to develop a more comprehensive model. Conceptual analysis of the main approaches to the history of science allows to discover whether the interaction between these disciplines is actually possible and what conditions for such interaction are. It is concluded that the condition for the disciplinary unity of the history of science is the expansion of the definition of science as an activity aimed at production of knowledge in a particular socio-cultural community. While philosophical methods allow to define specific features of the process of knowledge production, methodology sets validation criteria and science studies oriented at socio-cultural group of factors define the key mechanisms of the development of such knowledge production. Keywords: history of science, scientific picture of the world, science about science, historical methodology of science, production of scientific knowledge, knowledge evaluation criteria, efficiency of scientific knowledge, procedures for knowledge validation, disciplinary unity.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Rozova, S.S. Klassifikatsionnaya problema v sovremennoy nauke/S.S. Rozova. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986. – 223 s.
2. Bernal Dzh. Nauka v istorii obshchestva per. s angl. A. M. Vyaz'minoy, N. M. Makarovoy, E. G. Panfilova; / obshch. red. B. M. Kedrova, I. V. Kuznetsova.-M. : Inostr. lit., 1956.-735 s 3. Voznyakevich E.E. K voprosu o kontseptualizatsii izmeneniya issledovatel'skikh praktik v istorii nauki // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tekhnologii i dizayna. Seriya 3: Ekonomicheskie, gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. – 2010.-¹ 4. – S.50-54 4. Stepin V.S. Struktura teoreticheskogo znaniya i istoriko-nauchnye rekonstruktsii// Metodologicheskie problemy istoriko-nauchnykh issledovaniy / ; Red. I.S. Timofeev. – Moskva : Nauka , 1982. – S.132-169. 5. Przhilenskiy V.I. Filosofiya nauki kak issledovatel'skaya programma: mezhdu istoriey nauki i teoriey poznaniya // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 205 - 228. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.3.267. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_267.html 6. A.D. Ursul «Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie» 7. (K 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya 8. V.I. Vernadskogo) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 5. - C. 594 - 609. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.3. 9. A.V. Leopa Istoricheskoe soznanie 10. kak metod nauchnogo poznaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 3. - C. 108 - 114. 11. Nilogov A.S. Etos filosofii nauki (beseda A. S. Nilogova s A. P. Ogurtsovym v ramkakh proekta "Kto segodnya delaet filosofiyu v Rossii") // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 7. - C. 992 - 999. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.7.12308. |