Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V. Construction of crimes and state coercive measures in administrative and budget legislation

Abstract: The development of administrative legislation has led to the formation of detached branches of Russian legislation – financial, tax, budget, and tariff. Therefore, the corpora delicti of corresponding crimes were included in the codified legal acts – Budget Code of the Russian Federation, Tax Code (chapter 1). This article is aimed at carrying out of comparative analysis of regulations, introducing juridical responsibility for offences in budget sphere, provided by Code of Administrative Offences and Budget Code of the Russian Federation; and at formulation of particular ways of state coercive measures regulation as they are provided by the existing legislation. The methodology of the research is based on the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical, theoretical methods, dialectics, the system approach, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling, the traditional juridical methods (formal-logical), and the methods which are used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert evaluations, etc.). The authors of the article fully share the point of view that has formed in Russian science of administrative law about the administrative legal nature of budget enforcement measures, which are applied by “financial institutions and institutions of the Federal Treasury (their officials) on the grounds of notification about budget enforcement measures application by the body of state (municipal) financial control” (art. 306.2 part 1 BC of the Russian Federation). Study of the problem of correlation of budget and administrative enforcement measures seems to be of a big importance. Budget enforcement measures are provided by part 2 article 306.2 of Budget Code of the Russian Federation.


Keywords:

corpus delicti, responsibility, enforcement, sanction, constraint, administration, prohibition, finances, object.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 05.05.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 22.06.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
2. Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.07.1998 N 145-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2013, s izm. ot 03.02.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 03.08.1998, N 31, st. 3823.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 23 iyulya 2013 g. ¹ 252 – FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // RG. N 172. 07.08.2013.
4. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. redaktor L.L. Popov. Uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. M., 2014. 568 S.
5. Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik. 5-e izdanie. M., 2010. 607 s.
6. Kardashevskiy V.V. K voprosu o ponyatii «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 34 – 36.
7. Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik. M., 2005. 554 s.
8. Lapina M.A. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu soderzhaniya i struktury instituta administrativnoy yurisdiktsii v sisteme administrativnogo protsessa // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 11 – 21.
9. Otchet po NIR «Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya v oblasti byudzhetnykh otnosheniy» (nauchnyy rukovoditel', d.yu.n., professor A.A. Fat'yanov). M., Finuniversitet, 2013. // Tekst otcheta razmeshchen na informatsionno-obrazovatel'nom portale Finuniversiteta.
10. Panov A.B. O nekotorykh voprosakh administrativnoy yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 27 – 31.
11. Shergin A.P. Razmyshleniya ob administrativnoy yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 21 – 27.
12. Agapov A.B. Publichnoe prinuzhdenie
13. ili obshchestvennaya sanatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 743 - 752. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037.
14. Lapina M.A. Kontseptual'nye voprosy razvitiya administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo zakonodatel'stva v oblasti finansov, nalogov i sborov, strakhovaniya, rynka tsennykh bumag // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 843 - 856. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12396.