Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

M. B. Napso Theoretical Foundations of the Tax Status of Banks

Abstract: The subject of research is the legal provision of the tax status of banks. The relevance of the topic stems from the fact that the legal regulation of the obligation to transfer tax is fragmented as well as the tax status of the bank and this does not correspond to its special place in the tax legal relations. In view of this, the author elaborates on the legal regulation of the two inseparably linked obligations, i.e. the taxpayer should pay the tax and the bank or a tax agent should transfer it. The author thoroughly considers the execution of each obligation. The author also examines the issues related to the responsibility of banks and tax agents for non-transfer of tax amounts. The problem is considered through analysis of articles of the Russian Tax Code of different editions with subsequent synthesis of different points of view. In the end, the author offers his views on solution of this problem as follows: firstly, to proceed from the reality principle of fulfillment of tax obligations; secondly, to take into account special public law obligations of banks, and thirdly, to consider the obligation to pay taxes with due regard to the legal status of tax agents. As a result the author proposes to add two special articles: the article governing the fulfillment of the obligation to transfer taxes in general, and the article governing the special tax status of banks and their rights and duties in particular.


Keywords:

bank, tax agent, taxpayer, reality principle, payment of tax, transfer of tax, levy taxes, public law obligations of the bank, tax revenues, fiscal interests of the state.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Borisova O.V. Dobrosovestnost' v nalogovom prave: doktrina, prezumptsiya, printsip // Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika. M.: Izd. Dom «Arbitrazhnaya praktika», 2006. ¹ 4. S.23-30.
2. Vinnitskiy D.V. Sub'ekty nalogovogo prava. M.: Norma, 2000. 192 s.
3. Gisin E.M. Pravovoe polozhenie banka kak osobogo uchastnika nalogovykh pravootnosheniy: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003. 172 s.
4. Grachev A.V. Pravovoy status bankov kak uchastnika nalogovykh pravootnosheniy. – M., 2009.181 s.
5. Dolgopolov O.I., Lovinyukov A.S. O nadlezhashchikh usloviyakh ispolneniya nalogovoy obyazannosti//Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. M.: NB-Media, 2009. ¹ 12. S. 81-87.
6. Krasyukov A.V. Nalogovoe obyazatel'stvo: ponyatie i priznaki //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. M.: Yurist, 2012. ¹ 12. S.12-14.
7. Lopatnikova E.A. K voprosu o sootnoshenii printsipov nalogovogo prava i printsipov nalogooblozheniya// Finansovoe pravo. M.: Yurist., 2011. ¹ 3. S.32-36.
8. Lyutova O.I. Nalogovaya obyazannost' kak yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya // Pravo i gosudarstvo. Astana: Izd. KazGYuU, 2010. ¹ 1. S.55-58.
9. Lyutova O.I. Nalogovaya obyazannost': teoreticheskie aspekty i pravovoe regulirovanie. N.Novgorod: Izd. Nizhegorodskoy pravovoy akademii, 2013. 107 s.
10. Sashchikhina T.Yu. Nalogovaya obyazannost' kak pravovaya kategoriya// Finansovoe pravo. M.: Yurist, 2006.¹ 12. S. 22-25.