Library
|
Your profile |
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:
Batalova M.R.
Arbitration clauses within Private international law
of the Republic of Turkey
// International Law and International Organizations.
2014. № 4.
P. 537-544.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65690
Batalova M.R. Arbitration clauses within Private international law of the Republic of TurkeyAbstract: This article is dedicated to the issues associated with the use of the arbitration clauses category including the clause of public policy and mandatory (super-mandatory) norms in the legislation of the Republic of Turkey. This issue remains relevant despite the codifi cation of Private international law that took place in this country in 2007. Turkish legislature actively uses both arbitration clauses. As a rule, the elements of public policy that received normative consolidation use the “super-mandatory norms” as the mechanism for defense. Using the positive variation of the clause does not demonstrate the redundancy of such mechanism, rather the specifi city of its purpose. The effects of the negative clause expand into the areas of Private international legal relations where security of public interest cannot be guaranteed by mandatory norms alone. Keywords: Private international law, international civil procedure, the Republic of Turkey, arbitration clauses, public policy, mandatory norms, super-mandatory norms, codifi cation, choice of law.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Ansay T. Wallace D. Introduction to Turkish law. 6th Edition. Kluewer Law International, 2011.
2. Canyaş Asli Bayata. An Analysis of Public Policy Intervention in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Family Law Judgments under Turkish Private International Law // International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 2 No. 17; September 2012. 3. Girsberger D. Swiss Private international law compared to the new Turkish Act // Arsel Nüsret Semahat. Avrupa da Devletler Özel Hukuku Ve Yeni Türk Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Ve Usul Hukuku Hakkında Kanunun Akitler Ve Ticaret Hukukuna İlişkin Hükümleri. Istanbul. 2010. 4. Gülin, G. The Principle of Proximity in Contractual Obligations: The New Turkish Law on Private International Law and International Civil Procedure. Ankara Law Review 5. Guloren Tekinalp, Unal Tekinalp. The most recent case-law on the subject of jurisdiction agreements by the Assembly of the Civil Chamber of the Turkish Supreme Court of Appeals // Private law in the international arena. T.M.C. Asser Press. 2000. 6. Hilmar Kruger. An Outline of the History of Turkish Law of Conflict // Arsel Nüsret Semahat. Avrupa da Devletler Özel Hukuku Ve Yeni Türk Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Ve Usul Hukuku Hakkında Kanunun Akitler Ve Ticaret Hukukuna İlişkin Hükümleri. Istanbul. 2010. 7. Tekinalp Guloren, Nomer Ergin, Boztosun Ayshe Odman. Private international law in Turkey. Kluewer Law International, 2012. 8. Get'man-Pavlova I.V. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik. M.: Yurayt, 2013. 9. Get'man-Pavlova I.V. Mezhdunarodnyy i vnutrenniy publichnyy poryadok pri priznanii i ispolnenii inostrannykh arbitrazhnykh resheniy (pravoprimenitel'nyy opyt Frantsii i Rossii) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. № 1. 2014. 10. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik. M., 2011. 11. Koretskiy V.M. Ogovorka o publichnom poryadke v anglo-amerikanskoy sudebnoy praktike po delam, zatragivayushchim interesy SSSR // Uchenye zapiski. Vypusk 1. M., 1939. 12. Krokhalev S.V. Kategoriya publichnogo poryadka v mezhdunarodnom grazhdanskom protsesse. SPb, 2006. 13. Krutiy E.A. Zashchitnye ogovorki v sovremennykh kodifikatsiyakh mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Advokat. 2011. № 4. 14. Lunts L.A. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: v 3-kh t. M., 2002. 15. Morozova Yu.G. Ogovorka o publichnom poryadke v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave: ponyatie i sovremennyy poryadok primeneniya: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001. 16. Batalova M.R. Priznanie i prinuditel'noe ispolnenie inostrannykh 17. sudebnykh resheniy v Turetskoy Respublike // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1305 - 1318. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9786. |