|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Faritov, V. T.
Scientific Creativity as a Transgressive
Phenomenon
// Philosophy and Culture.
2014. ¹ 10.
P. 1423-1431.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65534
Faritov, V. T. Scientific Creativity as a Transgressive PhenomenonAbstract: The subject under research is the phenomenon of transgression in the scientific discourse as a source of scientific work. Scientific work has its own bifurcation points at which completeness and order of scientific discourse are broken. In such crisis situations scientific discourse turns into the transgressive regime of existence. The present regime is described by the neutralization of the existential-conceptual framework established by scientific discourse. As a result it becomes possible to discover other configurations of meaning and existence in scientific discourse. According to the author, transformation of scientific discourse into the transgressive regime of existence is a specific ontological condition of scientific work. In his research the author uses standard methods of ontological research that are usually used in both classical ontology and modern non-classical ontology. He also uses a few research methods offered by the synergetic approach. The transgressive regime is not typical for science, even for modern post-neoclassical science. However, transgression is a necessary condition of scientific work. Scientific discourse transforms into the transgressive regime, firstly, when a modified variant of scientific discourse has a crisis and secondly, when scientific discourse approaches to philosophical discourse. Both cases are the ‘bifurcation points’ at which scientific discourse loses its balanced nature and established constitution. Keywords: scientific discourse, transgression, transcendence, existential-conceptual perspective, bifurcation, modified variant, transgressive regime, paradoxical element, scientific work, constitution.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. – M.: Pravda, 1989. – 608 s.
2. Ver G. Karl Gustav Yung. – Chelyabinsk: «Ural LTD», 1998. – 216 s. 3. Vernadskiy V.I. Izbrannye trudy. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. – 744 s. 4. Delez Zh. Logika smysla. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2011. – 472 s. 5. Geyzenberg V. Fizika i filosofiya. – M.: Nauka, 1989. – 132 s. 6. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. – M.: Progress, 1977. – 304 s. 7. Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. – M.: AST; Khranitel', 2007. – 413 s. 8. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya. – Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 1996. – 208 s. 9. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. – SPb.: A-cad, 1994. – 408 s. 10. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 744 s. 11. Yung K.G. O prirode psikhe. Sbornik. – M.: «Refl-buk», K.: «Vakler», 2002. – 414 s. 12. Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. – M.: «Universitetskaya kniga», AST, 1998. – 720 s. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
