Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Shovkrinskiy, A.Y. Specifi c features of application of the norm on exhaustion of domestic legal remedies in the sphere of human rights

Abstract: The article concerns specifi c features of application of the norm on exhaustion of domestic legal remedies in the sphere of human rights. The author evaluates the activities of various supranational and international judicial bodies. Special attention is paid to the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The author studies specifi c issues regarding the nature of exhaustion of local legal remedies, the issues of amount of exhaustion of such domestic legal remedies and the goals of this rule in the international law. Having provided the analysis of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the European Commission of Human Rights and other human rights institutions, the author draws a conclusion that in the process of implementation of the rule for the exhaustion of domestic legal remedies, there is an established balance between the natural persons addressing these bodies and respondent states. This balance allows for the guarantees of stability of international legal order on one hand, while on the other hand they are aimed at guaranteeing rights and lawful interests of a person.

Keywords:

international law, European law, the Council of Europe, the European Court of Human Rights, judicial practice, judicial protection, domestic legal order, international courts, national courts, legal protection.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. C. Trindade The Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law. 1983. R. 73.
2. Danielus Conditions of Admissibility in the Jurisprudence of the European Commission of Human Rights // 2 HRJ (1969). R. 292.
3. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
4. A. R. Sultanov. Esse o sudebnykh protsessakh ogranicheniya svobody vyrazheniya mnenii i svobody sovesti, urokakh istorii i evropeiskikh standartakh. // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2010. – ¹ 10.
5. Danel'yan A.A.. Pravovye voprosy prinuditel'nogo iz''yatiya inostrannoi sobstvennosti i inostrannykh investitsii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11507
6. Smirnova E.S. Problemy prebyvaniya inostrannykh grazhdan na territorii gosudarstva i voprosy obespecheniya ikh bezopasnosti // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.39-66. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.676. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_676.html
7. Kostenko N.I.. Kontseptsiya stanovleniya mezhdunarodnogo ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo (penitentsiarnogo) prava // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11614
8. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
9. Shinkaretskaya G.G.. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud: popytka otsenki // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11593
10. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.html
11. A.S. Smbatyan. Organy mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya: klassifikatsiya v ramkakh obshchei sistemy // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.12
12. A.S. Smbatyan. Pervoe reshenie Suda evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva – v kopilku avtoriteta // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
13. A. S. Smbatyan. Obychnye normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i obshchie printsipy kak istochnik sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
14. A. S. Smbatyan. Pravotvorchestvo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov: opyt MUTBYu // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
15. A. S. Smbatyan. Nuzhno li «spasat'» sistemu mezhdunarodnogo sudoproizvodstva ot fragmentatsii? // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107
16. Mil'chakova O.V.. Predely vmeshatel'stva Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v deyatel'nost' Konstitutsionnogo suda Bosnii i Gertsegoviny // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10872
17. M.A. Gracheva. Vysylka (deportatsiya) migrantov v svete zashchity prava na uvazhenie semeinoi zhizni v Evropeiskom sude po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.11
18. O. O. Salagai. Issledovanie pravovykh pozitsii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v otnoshenii zashchity lits, stradayushchikh psikhicheskimi rasstroistvami // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
19. Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.753
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.