Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Ryzhov, V.B. Manifestation of integration patterns in the organization of the activities of the World Trade Organization

Abstract: Taking an example of the World Trade Organization, the author evaluate the infl uence of the integration phenomenon on the democracy and institutional organization of states and international organizations. The author considers that the only reliable method for centralization and integration in the international cooperation in an important sphere of activities, such as trade, is judicial resolution of disputes among the states regarding interpretation of the said norms. However, the transfer of judicial competence from the states to the international organization raises the issue of its compliance with the national constitutions. Additionally, revision of the national legislation by the judicial bodies of the organization threatens with the unpredictable widening of the competence of organization outside the scope provided for it by the sovereign member states. There may be a confl ict between the acts of an organization and national legislation, refl ecting differences in values. Providing the organization law with the direct effect without prior approval by the representative bodies challenges one of the necessary conditions for the existence of international relations: supremacy of law, causing doubts in legitimacy and democracy of such a situation. As a conclusion the author states that the only reservoir of experience in this situation lies with the states themselves. However, this experience can hardly be directly transferred to the international level. Therefore, one may state that the contradiction between two vital problems: integration and democracy is not yet resolved, and there is no satisfactory theory for dealing with this contradiction.


Keywords:

international law, the World Trade Organization, integration, democracy, organization of activities, institutions, bodies, reform, legitimacy, global trade.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Matsushita M. , Schoenbaum T.J., Mavroidis P.C. The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (2nd edn OUP Oxford 2006).
2. Keohane R., Nye J. The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperationand the World Trade Organization: Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, 2000.
3. Jackson J.H. The Great 1994 Sovereignty Debate: United States Acceptance and Implementation of the Uruguy Round Results//36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 1997, p.187.
4. Joerges C., Petersmann U.-E. (eds) . Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Hart Oxford 2006).
5. Hilf M. Power, Rules and Principles: Which Orientation for GATT/WTO Law?//Journal of International Economic Law, v.4, 2001, P.111
6. Shell G.R. Trade Legalism and International Relations Theory: An Analisys of the World Trade Organization, 2001. p.382.
7. V. B. Ryzhov. Evolyutsiya pravovykh osnov vnedogovornoi politiki ES v otnoshenii stran i regional'nykh organizatsii Azii i Latinskoi Ameriki v ramkakh politiki sodeistviya razvitiyu razvivayushchimsya stranam. // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 3.
8. A.V. Levitskii. Finansovyi kontrol' v Rossii v usloviyakh vstupleniya v VTO // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2013.2.9727.
9. I.V. Ershova. Bukhgalterskii uchet v usloviyakh chlenstva Rossii v VTO i Tamozhennom soyuze // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/.2013.1.9646.
10. N. M. Dobrynin, A. N. Mitin. Komu vygodno (sui prodest) nakhozhdenie Rossii v VTO? // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107.
11. I. B. Gordanov. Obshchaya torgovaya politika Evropeiskogo Soyuza: mekhanizm, kompetentsiya i protsedury. // Pravo i politika. – 2006. – ¹ 3.
12. K.A. Dubinkina. Deklaratsiya tysyacheletiya: est' li progress za 10 let? // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.04.14.
13. S. N. Dubinkina. Stanovlenie i razvitie mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regulirovaniya torgovli uslugami. // Pravo i politika. – 2006. – ¹ 2.
14. Kireeva N.V.. Mekhanizm obrazovaniya integratsionnykh svyazei // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9788.
15. Ershova I.V.. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie tsen v usloviyakh ekonomicheskoi integratsii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.1.10019.
16. Kireeva N.V.. Funktsional'nye otnosheniya chastei v integratsionnom tselom i opredelenie sub''ektov mezhdunarodnykh integratsionnykh protsessov // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.12.10199.
17. Kireeva N.V.. Ponyatie tselostnosti v sistemnoi teorii mezhdunarodnoi integratsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.10200.
18. I.A. Kholov. Evraziiskoe ekonomicheskoe soobshchestvo: spetsifika, vnutrennie protsessy, perspektivy // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.10.
19. O. A. Krasnoperova. Istochniki integratsionnogo nalogovogo prava kak element nalogovogo mekhanizma gosudarstv-chlenov ES // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107
20. Ershova I.V. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie tsen v usloviyakh ekonomicheskoi integratsii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 110 - 119. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.1.10019.