Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Kireeva, N.V. On systemic approach to defining the main categories of the general security theory.

Abstract: The definition apparatus within the general security theory is not completely formed, which is unfortunate. The legislatively recognized definition of security as “condition of protection of vital interests of person, society and state from internal and external threats’ does not seem appropriate, since the term “condition” characterizes the changes in the matters, and does not allow to establish their common substantial features. Defining security as “protection” seems overly direct and simplified, since it presupposes the possibility of achieving an ideal situation, which is actually impossible to achieve. Defining security threats as “combination of conditions and factors, forming danger to vital interests of person, society and state” is tautological, and it also causes many researchers to generate a maximum number of negative factors, leading to formation of a overly large specter of causes, having negative influence on the process of development, making it hard to specify and evaluate them. The author of this article attempts to uncover the contents of key elements of general security theory from the standpoint of systemic analysis.


Keywords:

general security theory, security of social systems, sustainable development, security threats, conf licts, social evolution factors, needs, social interests, coordination of interests, interaction of interests.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. G. G. Gazimagomedov, L. V. Davydov Konfliktnye osnovaniya politicheskoi bezopasnosti v sovremennoi Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-2.-C. 9-21.
2. Perov E.V. Teoriya i analiz sotsial'noi konfliktogennosti obshchestva // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-5.-C. 67-141. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_2308.html
3. Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 1-47. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
4. Ursul A.D. Sinergeticheskii podkhod k issledovaniyu bezopasnosti // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2012.-2.-C. 1-47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.207. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_207.html.
5. Ursul A.D. Obespechenie natsional'noi bezopasnosti cherez prioritety ustoichivogo razvitiya // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-1.-C. 1-61. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_325.html
6. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Problema bezopasnosti: global'nye i universal'no-evolyutsionnye aspekty // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2012.-1.-C. 81-159. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.1.67. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_67.html
7. Williamson P.J. Variants of Corporatism: Theory and Practice. – Cambridge, 1985.
8. Ursul A.D. Natsional'naya ideya i global'nye protsessy: bezopasnost', ustoichivoe razvitie, noosferogenez // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-2.-C. 1-66. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_541.html
9. Dahrendorf R. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, 1959.
10. Boulding K.E. Conflict and Defence: A General Theory. – N.-Y., Harper and Brothers, 1962.
11. Filosofiya politiki. Kniga II. Zakonomernosti i zakony politicheskogo protsessa. M.: Luch, 1993. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 1983.
12. Ursul A.D. Priroda bezopasnosti. // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2008. ¹ 1.
13. Ursul A.D. Printsip «bezopasnost' cherez ustoichivoe razvitie»: kontseptual'no-metodologicheskii analiz // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2009. ¹ 2.
14. Toinbi A.Dzh. Postizhenie istorii / Per. s angl. M., 1991.
15. Soros Dzh. Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. M., 1999.
16. Strategiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii do 2020 goda. Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 maya 2009 goda ¹ 537.
17. Smul'skii S.V. Interesy Rossii: strategicheskii kurs. // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. 2008, ¹ 6(56).
18. Sorokin P.A. O tak nazyvaemykh faktorakh sotsial'noi evolyutsii / P.A.Sorokin. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. / Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1992.
19. Smul'skii S.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy upravleniya konfliktami v mezhdunarodnykh sistemakh. Diss. … d. polit. n. – M., 1997.
20. Larin V.A. Bezopasnost' razvitiya i razvitie bezopasnosti. // Svobodnaya mysl'. 1996. ¹ 7.
21. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 1.
22. Problemy bezopasnosti. Byulleten' Fonda «Nauka-XXI». 2008. ¹ 4.
23. Prokhozhev A.A. Natsional'naya bezopasnost': teoriya, sushchnost', problemy. Lektsiya. M.: Izd-vo RAGS. 2005.
24. Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
25. Kaluzhskii M.L. «Sistemnost'»-novaya traktovka ponyatiya. // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2004. ¹ 4
26. Kortunov S.V. Stanovlenie politiki bezopasnosti: Formirovanie politiki natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii v kontekste globalizatsii. – M.: Nauka, 2003.
27. Zolotareva E.V. Gruppy interesov v politike // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. – Seriya: Politologiya. – 1999. ¹ 1.
28. Zdravomyslov A.G. Problema interesa v sotsiologicheskoi teorii. – L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1964.
29. Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya. T.5. M.-L., 1937.
30. Global'nye vyzovy, ugrozy i opasnosti sovremennosti. Prioritety politiki obespecheniya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii [Pod obshch. red. A.V.Vozzhenikova]. – M.: Izd-vo RAGS, 2008.
31. Bogdanov A.A. Tektologiya. Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka. – M., 1922.
32. Andreevskii I.E. Politseiskoe pravo. T.1. Ch.1. Politsiya bezopasnosti. SPb., 1874.
33. Bel'kov O.A., Miroshnichenko V.M. Opasnost' kak sotsial'noe yavlenie i nauchnoe ponyatie. // Problemy bezopasnosti. Byulleten' Nauchno-issledovatel'skogo tsentra «Nauka-XXI». 2008. ¹ 1.