Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Bogdanova, V. O. Metamorphoses of Subjectivity in Constructivist Models

Abstract: The article is devoted to constructivist models of philosophizing in terms of their succession and interdependence in accordance with particular historically developed traditions of philosophizing. The author of the article defines the three types of constructivist models of philosophizing: constructivist hylomorphism, constructivist eidetics and constructivist hermeneutics. In constructivist hylomorphism the basic constructs are a priori forms of cognition that create prerequisites for subjectivity, in constructivist eidetics – phenomena of consciousness that ensure the subjectivity of the world and in constructivist hermeneutics – communication means that create conditions for inter-subjectivity.

Keywords:

philosophy, subject, epistemology, knowledge, constructivism, philosophizing, typology, hylomorphism, eidetic, hermeneutics.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii zna-niya. M.: Medum, 1995.
2. Vitgenshtein L. O dostovernosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. ¹ 2. S. 67–120.
3. Gutner G. B. Gileomorfizm, eidetika i kommunikativnye praktiki // Nauka: ot metodologii k ontologii. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 152–167.
4. Kasavin I. T. Konst ru k tivizm: za yavlennye prog rammy i nereshennye problemy // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. X V. ¹ 1. S. 5–14.
5. Knyazeva E. N. Epistemologicheskii konstruktivizm // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 12: Fenomen soznaniya. M.: IF RAN, 2006. S. 133–152.
6. Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya / O tv. red. V. A. Lektorskii. M.: IF RAN, 2008.
7. Konstruktivistskii podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke / Otv. red. V. A. Lektorskii. M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.
8. Konstruktivizm v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke: (materialy «Kruglogo stola») // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. ¹ 3. S. 18.
9. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: EKSMO-Press, 2001.
10. Lektorskii V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2009.
11. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001.
12. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999. 1 3 . O b s u zh d aem s t at 'i o kons t r u k t i vi zme (V. P. F i l at ov, I. T. K as a vi n, G. I. R u z a vi n, A . Yu. A n t o n o v s k i i) // E p i s t e m o l o g i ya & f i l o s o f i ya n a u k i . 2 0 0 9 . T. X X . ¹ 2 . S . 1 4 4 –1 5 6 . 14. Ulanovskii A. M. Konstruktivizm, radikal'nyi konstruktivizm, sotsial'nyi konstrukti-vizm: mir kak interpretatsiya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2009. ¹ 2. S. 35–45. 15. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.