Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Shults, D. N. Relation Between the Question about Universals and Different Questions in Christian Philosophy

Abstract: The article is devoted to formation of Christian doctrines from the point of view of the medieval debate about universals. As a result of this research, it has been established that the categories of the general and particular are the corner stone for Christian theology, anthropology, soteriology and ecclesiasiology. It is shown that during formation of the religious teaching about the Trinity, Christian authors tried to avoid extremities of Realism and Nominalism in philosophy as well as extremities of absolute monotheism and polytheism in theology. As a result specific views on personality was formed and provided the basis for Christian anthropology. Different Christian doctrines about salvation can be also described as the consequence of different philosophies, for example, Catholic and Orthodox doctrines are the result of Realism paradigms and Protestant doctrine is the result of Nominalism. And finally, in the teaching about church Catholic and Orthodox positions are absolutely opposing to each other: the former is supported by Realism and the latter is supported by Nominalism. Therefore, it is very well explained by the author of the article why the debate about universals plaid such an important role in medieval philosophy. In fact, the question about the relation between the general and the particular created philosophical basis for formation of all Christian dogmata.

Keywords:

Christian philosophy, debates about universals, Medieval philosophy, personality, teaching about the Trinity, teaching about church, teaching about salvation, Christology, patristics, the general and the particular.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Richardus S. Victoris. De Trinitate Libri Sex // PL. V.196. Col. 0887-0992B. Paris, 1855
2. Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. – M.: Mysl', 1976.
3. Afanasii Velikii. 4 poslaniya k Serapionu // Tvoreniya izhe vo svyatykh ottsa nashego Afanasiya Velikago, Arkhiepiskopa Aleksandriiskago. Chast' tret'ya. – M.: Svyato-Troitskaya Sergeeva Lavra, 1903. C. 3 – 91.
4. Boetsii. «Uteshenie filosofiei» i drugie traktaty. – M.: Izdatel'stvo LKI, 2010. S.416.
5. Vasilii Velikii. Protiv Evnomiya // Tvoreniya: v 2 t. Tom pervyi. – M.: Sibirskaya blagozvonnitsa, 2008. S.169 – 319.
6. Grigorii Bogoslov. Slova // Tvoreniya. T.1. – M.: Sibirskaya blagozvonnitsa, 2007. S.896.
7. Platon. Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. – M.: Mysl', 1990.
8. Porfirii. Vvedenie k «Kategoriyam» Aristotelya // Aristotel'. Kategorii. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1939. S.84.
9. Tertullian. Protiv Prakseya // Tvoreniya Tertulliana. Chast' chetvertaya. – SPb, 1850. S.127-198.
10. Foma Akvinskii. Summa teologii. – Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 2002-2013
11. Armstrong A.Kh. Istoki khristianskogo bogosloviya. Vvedenie v antichnuyu filosofiyu. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko, 2006. S.256.
12. Berkkhov L. Istoriya khristianskikh doktrin. – SPb.: Bibliya dlya vsekh, 2000. S.320.
13. Biryukov D.S. Problema universalii v vizantiiskoi filosofii. – SPb.: GUAP, 2011. S.28
14. Bredshou D. Aristotel' na Vostoke i na Zapade: Metafizika i razdelenie khristianskogo mira. – M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2012. S.384
15. Gribanovskii M. Lektsii po vvedeniyu v krug bogoslovskikh nauk. – Kiev: Prolog, 2003. S.252.
16. Zavershinskii G. Bogoslovie dialoga: otnoshenie lyudei v veshchestvennom mire // Tserkov' i vremya, ¹2 (51), 2010. S.195 – 208.
17. Zavershinskii G. Bogoslovie dialoga: trinitarnyi podkhod // Tserkov' i vremya, ¹2 (31), 2005. S.62 – 77.
18. Ziziulas I. Bytie kak obshchenie: ocherki o lichnosti i Tserkvi. – M.: Svyato-Filaretovskii pravoslavno-khristianskii institut, 2006. S.280.
19. Zotov A.F. Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2005. S.781.
20. Karsavin L.P. Svyatye Ottsy i Uchitelya Tserkvi. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994. S.176.
21. Kontseptsii chelovecheskoi lichnosti v bogoslovii i religioznom soznanii Novogo i Noveishego vremeni. – M.: IVI RAN, 2008. S.189.
22. Koplston F. Istoriya filosofii. Srednie veka. – M.: 2003. S.494.
23. Kurt F. Bog troichnoi lyubvi. – M.: Khristianskaya Rossiya, 2010. S.320.
24. Losskii V.N. Bogoslovskoe ponyatie chelovecheskoi lichnosti // Bogovidenie. – Minsk: Belorusskii ekzarkhat, 2007. S.400 – 410.
25. Losskii V.N. Ocherk misticheskogo bogosloviya vostochnoi tserkvi. Dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie – M.: Tsentr "SEI", 1991. S.288.
26. Maiorov G.G. Formirovanie srednevekovoi filosofii. Latinskaya patristika. – M.: URSS, 2009. S.296.
27. Pelikan Ya. Khristianskaya traditsiya. Istoriya razvitiya veroucheniya. Vozniknovenie kafolicheskoi traditsii [100-600]. Tom 1. – M.: Dukhovnaya biblioteka, 2007. S.375.
28. Pelikan Ya. Khristianskaya traditsiya. Istoriya razvitiya veroucheniya. Dukh vostochnogo khristianstva [600-1700]. Tom 2. – M.: Dukhovnaya biblioteka, 2009. S.317.
29. Ragulin I.R., Samsonov V.V. O vozmozhnom vliyanii na Boetsiya traditsii kappadokiiskogo bogosloviya // www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0226/002a/02260030.htm
30. Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii. – SPb.: Azbuka, 2001. S.958.
31. Suini M. Lektsii po srednevekovoi filosofii. – M.: Greko-latinskii kabinet, 2001. S.304.
32. Tatarkevich V. Istoriya filosofii. Antichnaya i srednevekovaya filosofiya. – Perm': Izd-vo Perm. un-ta, 2000. S.482.
33. Uil'yams R. Bogoslovie V.N. Losskogo: izlozhenie i kritika. – Kiev: DUKh I LITERA, 2009. S.336.
34. Fisher N. Filosofskoe voproshanie o Boge. – M.: Khristianskaya Rossiya, 2004. S.415.
35. Chursanov S.A. Ponyatie litsa () v Svyashchennom Pisanii i v filosofsko-terminologicheskom kontekste nachala epokhi Vselenskikh Soborov// Tserkov' i vremya, ¹2 (39), 2007. S.92-112.
36. Shenborn K. Ikona Khrista. Bogoslovskie osnovy. – M.: Khristianskaya Rossiya, 1999. S.232.
37. Shishkov A.M. Srednevekovaya intellektual'naya kul'tura. – M.: Izdatel' Savin S.A., 2003. S.592
38. Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 102. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html
39. Koren' R.V. Triedinye sistemy kak metayazyk kartiny mira // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 70 - 116. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_722.html
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.