|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Mashonina, A. A.
Interdependence of Characteristics
of One’s Subjective Picture
of Life Path and Creativity
of Mature People For the Purpose
of Formation
of Successful Personalities
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2013. ¹ 10.
P. 973-980.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63404
Mashonina, A. A. Interdependence of Characteristics of One’s Subjective Picture of Life Path and Creativity of Mature People For the Purpose of Formation of Successful PersonalitiesAbstract: The present research is based on the analysis of interdependency of characteristics of the subjective picture of life path and creativity demonstrated by a group of successful individuals in order to make practical recommendations on how to teach young people to activate and use their creative potentials in the process of building their life according to their own desires and opportunities. In other others, the purpose of the research is to provide statistical summary of successful (i.e. creative) individuals building their life path. Respondents involved in the research worked at academic and research institutions and had a PhD in medicine or technical science (or good position at a university) and also had families. The results of the research showed that creative people were naturally active on their life path and demonstrated interest towards learning and creating new things, set life goals and clearely understood how to achieve them, had large-scaled life goals and understood the causal and purpose connections between events. Keywords: picture of life path, creativity, causometria, divergent thinking, success, biographical method, life program, the scale of life targets, strategy, rationality.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Abul'khanova K.A., Berezina T.N. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001.
2. Barysheva T.A., Zhigalov Yu.A. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy razvitiya kreativnosti. SPb: SPGUTD, 2006. 268s. 3. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Intellektual'naya aktivnost' kak problema tvorchestva. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rostovskogo un-ta, 1983. 172 s. 4. Brushlinskiy A.V. Psikhologiya sub'ekta / Otv.red.prof. 4. V. V. Znakov.M.:Institut psikhologii RAN; SPb: izdat. "Aleteyya", 2003g. 272 s. 5. Kronik A.A., Akhmerov R.A. Kauzometriya: Metody samopoznaniya, psikhodiagnostiki i psikhoterapii v psikhologii zhiznennogo puti. M.: Smysl, 2008. 294 s. 6. Rubinshteyn S. L. Chelovek i mir. M.: Nauka, 1997. 191 s. 7. Soldatova E. L. Proektivnaya metodika diagnostiki divergentnogo myshleniya // nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal "Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya" ¹ 2(3) 2005g. S.119-125. 8. Suslova T.S. Nekotorye osobennosti kreativnykh lichnostey: Sistemnoe issledovanie individual'nosti. Perm', 1991. S. 149. 9. Tunik E.E. Diagnostika lichnostnoy kreativnosti // sbornik "Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp" Fetiskin N. P., Kozlov V.V., Manuylov G.M. M., 2002. C.59-64. 10. Baas M., De Dreu C.K., Nijstad B.A. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus.-Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;134(6):779-806. 11. Carson, Shelley H., Peterson, Jordon B. and Higgins, Daniel M. Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire.-Creativity Research Journal, 2005, 17 (1), 37 – 50. 12. Feist G.J. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity.-Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (1998), pp. 290–309. 13. Kim, Kyung Hee. Measurements, Causes, and Effects of Creativity. – Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol 4(3), Aug 2010, 131-135. 14. Sawyer R.K Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation: The Science of Human Innovation. York: Oxford University Press, 2012. 15. Silvia P.J. Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas?-Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol 2(3), 139-146, Aug 2008. 16. Silvia P.J., Kaufman J.C., Pretz J.E. Is Creativity Domain-Specific? Latent Class Models of Creative Accomplishments and Creative Self-Descriptions.-Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2009,Vol. 3, ¹3, 139-148. 17. Torrance E. P. Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth.-Daedalus: Creativity and Learning, 1965. P. 663-679. 18. Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
