|
National Security
Reference:
Nartsyssova, S.Y., Noskov, Y.M., Krupennikov, N.A, Matvienko, S.V., Kondratiev, V.S.
Thinking as a personal development factor:
modeling specific cogitativestyle features of
argumentation.
// National Security.
2013. № 5.
P. 124-148.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63362
Nartsyssova, S.Y., Noskov, Y.M., Krupennikov, N.A, Matvienko, S.V., Kondratiev, V.S. Thinking as a personal development factor:
modeling specific cogitativestyle features of
argumentation.
Abstract:
The authors of the article develop and discuss the
conceptual model of cogitative-style determination
of the argument. They provide the comparative
cogitative style model, showing effect of cogitativestyle
mobility, as well as specific features of the
organization of psycholinguistic and psychosemantic
studies, processing its results by the
following methods of the sampling theory: with
the use of contingency tables, with the use of χ2-
Pearson criterion, with the dot-biserial coefficient
of correlation of Pearson, univariate analysis
of variance. The conclusions provided in the
article were formed by the empirical research of
interrelation between cogitative styles and features
of the argumentation.
Keywords:
cognition, cogitative style model, cogitative style specific features, Mann-Whitney U-test, dispersion analysis, chi^2 criterion, empiric frequencies, theoretical frequencies, contingency tables, modeling
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Witkin H.A. Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins. Field Dependence and Field Independence / H.A. Witkin, D.R. Goodenough. New York, 1982.
2. Guilford J.P. Cognitive style: what are they? // Educational and Psychological Measurment. 1980. Vol. 40 (3).
3. Armstrong, S.J. The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education // Educational Psychology. 2000. Sep. Vol. 20. Issue 3.
4. Alloy L.V., Abramson L.Y., Whitehouse W.G. Depressogenic cognitive styles: predicitve validity, information processing and personality characteristics, and developmental origins // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1999. Jun.
5. Shkuratova I.P. Kognitivnye stili kak regulyatory mirovospriyatiya lichnosti // Pervaya rossiyskaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoy nauke. Tezisy dokladov. – Kazan': KGU, 2004, S.256.
6. Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual'nogo uma. SPb., 2004.-384 s.
7. Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g, № 273-FZ.
8. Tolochek V.A. Stili deyatel'nosti: model' stiley s izmenchivymi usloviyami deyatel'nosti. M., 1992.-77s.
9. Sobchik L.N. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu individual'nosti. M.: Izd-vo: Institut prakticheskoy psikhologii, 2000.-512 s.
10. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psikhosemantiki.-Smolensk: SGU, 1997.-400 s.
11. Nasledov A.D. SPSS 19: professional'nyy statisticheskiy analiz dannykh. – SPb. Piter, 2011.-400s.
12. Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya: analiz i interpretatsiya dannykh. Uchebnoe posobie. 3-e izd. – SPb.: Rech', 2007.-392 s.
13. Nartsissova S.Yu. Metodika diagnostiki kognitivno-stilevykh osobennostey argumentatsii: sushchnost', etapy provedeniya, rezul'taty // Nauka i sovremennost'-2011: sbornik materialov IKh Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod obshch. red. S.S. Chernova. – Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo NGTU, 2011. S. 309.
14. Matvienko S.V., Dvoretskiy S.A. Statisticheskie metody v psikhologicheskikh i sotsial'nykh naukakh: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie // MO Shchelkovo: Izdatel' Markhotin, 2013.-194 s.
15. Baranov A.N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyy podkhod): Diss. ... dokt. filol. nauk.-M.:1990,-378 s.
16. Vasil'ev L.G. Argumentativnye aspekty ponimaniya.-M.: IP RAN, 1994.-222 s.
17. Berezina T.N. O vzaimodeystvii fizicheskikh i intellektual'nykh sposobnostey. // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2012.-1.-C. 1-24. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2012.1.47. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_47.html
|