Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Ksenofontov, K.E. Acceptability of expropriation of property of a foreign investor by a host state

Abstract: The right of a state to expropriate foreign investments is one of the principles of international investment law. It is a part of international customary law, and it is enshrined in international treaties, judicial and arbitration practice. It is also recognized by most scholars. At the same time most sources of international investment law establish a number of requirements for a lawful act of forced expropriation of property of a foreign investor. Among such requirements, they usually recognized the public goal of an expropriation, nondiscriminatory basis for an expropriation, due legal procedure, and payment of compensation. And while the payment of compensation is generally recognized, the rest of the criteria have been objects to much debating. This article includes analysis of the contents of the above-mentioned requirements and the consequences of failure to comply with them. In particular, the author supposes that the distinguishing between a lawful (that is, performed in compliance with the international legal standards in the international legal acts) and unlawful nationalization of foreign investor property has a limited value. The author provides doctrinal basis for this position and the relevant practice of international tribunals.


Keywords:

foreign investments, nationalization, expropriation, foreign investor, compensation, forced expropriation of investments, investment protection, capital investment, international investment law, international investment arbitration.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bin Cheng. UN Resolutions on Outer Space: Instant International Customary Law // Indian Journal of International Law. 1965. №23. P. 35
2. Farkhutdinov I.Z. Prinuditel'nye formy iz'yatiya inostrannykh investitsiy: teoriya i praktika. Chast' 1 // Vestnik FGU GRP pri Minyuste Rossii. 2011. №3.
3. Lisitsa V.N., Pravovoe regulirovanie investitsionnykh otnosheniy: teoriya, zakonodatel'stvo i praktika primeneniya. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. 2011.
4. Commeaux P. E., Kinsella S.N. Protecting Foreign Investment Under International Law, Legal Aspects of Political Risk. New York: Oceana Publishing. 1997.
5. Bowett D.W. State Contracts with Aliens: Contemporary developments on compensation for termination and breach // British Yearbook of International Law. 1980. N. 59. P.59
6. Brownlie I. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008.
7. MaÞ H., Controversial Issues of Compensation in Cases of Expropriation and Nationalization: Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal // International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2011. Vol. 18 (1). P. 84-85.
8. Mohebi M. The International Law Character of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. Hague: Kluwer Law International. 1999.
9. Schachter O. The Right of States to Use Armed Force // Michigan Law Review. 1984. N. 82. P. 1620-1664
10. Jean Raby. The Right of Intervention for the Protection of Nationals : Reassessing the Doctrinal Debate // Les Cahiers de droit. 1989. Vol. 30. P. 441-493
11. Bowett D.W. The Use of Force in the Protection of Nationals. Transactions of the Grotius Society , Problems of Public and Private International Law. 1957. Vol. 43. P. 111-126
12. Sornarajah M. The International Law on Foreign Investment (Second Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.
13. Bishop D.R. International Arbitration of Petroleum Disputes: The Development of a Lex Petrolea // Yearbook of Commercial Arbitration. 1998. P. 1157-11