Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Erzin, A. I. Proactive Personal Resources of Patients Who Receive Rehabilitation Treatment After Cerebrovascular Accident

Abstract: The study is devoted to personal constitution of proactive behavior of patients suffering from ischemic cerebrovascular accident. It has been established that the key personal predictors of formation of proactive patterns, based on the patients studied, are their socially determined needs (metaneeds) and a free will. The least developed elements of proactive patients with CVA are reflection and prognosis of consequences of one’s behavior which is most likely to be the result of decreased cognition. The most frequent proactive coping strategies in a group of patients include proactive, reflective and preventive coping. Proactive aggression as a deliberate violent behavior is rarely met compared to reactive aggression. In the course of the study it has been established that proactive personal elements represented as the patient’s desire to achieve personal goals, may be used as a personal resource influencing the success of rehabilitation measures.


Keywords:

proactive behavior, proactivity, aggression, coping behavior, cerebrovascular accident, stroke, personal resources, coping strategies, reactive aggression, proactive aggression.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Antipova L.N., Artem'eva O.V. Mediko-sotsial'naya rabota v pervichnom sosudistom otdelenii dlya bol'nykh s ostrym narusheniem mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya (pervyy opyt) // Vestnik MUZ GB ¹ 2. 2011. ¹ 15. S. 67-75.
2. Astaeva A.V., Epaneshnikova N.V. Neyropsikhologicheskaya kharakteristika narusheniy rechi pri ostrykh narusheniyakh mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya i problemy ikh klassifikatsii v otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy neyropsikhologii // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2012. ¹ 6 (265). S. 73-79.
3. Biserova S.V., Pavlova B.C. Sopostavlenie kognitivnykh i psikhoemotsional'nykh izmeneniy u lits, perenesshikh ostroe narushenie mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya // Vyatskiy meditsinskiy vestnik. 2007. ¹ 1. S. 46.
4. Vodop'yanova N.E. Psikhodiagnostika stressa. SPb: Piter, 2009. 336 s. (Seriya «Praktikum»).
5. Gayfutdinova L.V., Vasil'eva M.A. Faktory effektivnosti vosstanovleniya rechi u bol'nykh, perenesshikh ostroe narushenie mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya i cherepno-mozgovuyu travmu // Vertebronevrologiya. 2004. T. 11. ¹ 3-4. S. 11-12.
6. Erzin A.I. Proaktivnoe povedenie pri nekotorykh psikhicheskikh zabolevaniyakh: kriterii, faktory formiro-vaniya, tipologiya // Psikhiatriya, psikhoterapiya i klinicheskaya psikhologiya. 2012. ¹ 4 (10). S. 64-77.
7. Erzin A.I. O proaktivnom sovladayushchem povedenii // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2013. ¹ 1. C. 89-100. (URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_274.html).
8. Ermakova L.A., Shamurov Yu.S., Sviridova L.P., Vasilenko A.F. Dinamika sostoyaniya vysshikh psikhiche-skikh funktsiy u bol'nykh s ostrymi narusheniyami mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya raznoy etiologii v levoy gemisfere // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2009. ¹ 5 (138). S. 25-30.
9. Levit L.Z. Lichnostno-orientirovannaya kontseptsiya schast'ya: kratkaya istoriya // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2012. ¹ 8. C. 78-86.
10. Olport G. Stanovlenie lichnosti. M.: Smysl, 2002.
11. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. M.: Progress, 1990.
12. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
13. Bateman, T.S., & Crant, M.J. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
14. Campbell, D.J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 52-66.
15. Connor D.F., Steingard R.J., Anderson J.J., Melloni R.H. (2003). Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 33: 279-294.
16. Dodge K., Loeber R., Gatzke-Kopp L., Lynam D. (2006). The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys // Aggressive Behavior. Volume 32, pages 159-171.
17. Dodge K.A., Coie J.D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 53: 1146–1158.
18. Fung A.L., Raine A., Gao Y. (2009). Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) // Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(5), 473-479.
19. Kahana E., Kahana B., Zhang J. Motivational Antecedents of Preventive Proactivity in Late Life: Linking Future Orientation and Exercise // Motivation and Emotion. Vol. 29. ¹ 4. December 20.
20. Seligman, M.E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5-14