Library
|
Your profile |
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Pogontseva, D. V.
Types of Appearance
Discrimination
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2013. ¹ 9.
P. 858-861.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63229
Pogontseva, D. V. Types of Appearance DiscriminationAbstract: The article is devoted to the phenomenon of appearance discrimination. The author analyzes theoretical and experimental works of foreign researchers devoted to such type of discrimination at lookism. Lookism is the term that is used in foreign literature and describes the phenomenon of discrimination of beautiful people, noteworthy that authors of many publications describe the ‘positive’ discrimination. These foreign researches of discrimination in different interaction situations show that beautiful people tend to receive a higher salary, receive better grades as students and etc. The author of the present article also provides the results of the empiric research of discrimination of good-looking people. Based on the study of Russian respondents, there is the appearance discrimination in Russia (about 89% of all cases) and it is usually lookism (‘positive’ discrimination of beautiful people) and discrimination of people who are too fat/skinny or taller/shorter than average height. Keywords: discrimination, lookism, attractive appearance, beauty, categorization, attitude, benefit, stereotype, interaction, appearance.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Vorob'ev S.M. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy bor'by s diskriminatsiey v Rossii // LEX RUSSICA (RUS-SKIY ZAKON). 2013. ¹ 1. C. 16-24.
2. Labunskaya V.A. «Vidimyy chelovek» kak sotsial'no-psikhologicheskiy fenomen // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2010. ¹ 1. S. 26-39. 3. Berggren N., Jordahl H., Poutvaara P. The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success // Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 94. Is. 1–2. Feb. 2010. P. 8-15. 4. Costin C. Your dieting daughter: is she dying for attention? // Psychology Press. 1996. R. 240. 5. Giordano S. Exercise and Eating Disorders: An Ethical and Legal Analysis. Taylor & Francis, 2009. 6. Grunig L.A., Hon L.C., Toth E.L. Women in Public Relations: How Gender Influences Practice. Routledge, 2004. 7. Hamermesh D.S. Changing looks and changing “discrimination”: The beauty of economists Economics Letters. Volume 93. Issue 3. December 2006. P. 405-412. 8. Hamermesh D., Parker A. Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity // Economics of Education Review. Vol. 24. Is. 4. August 2005. P. 369-376. 9. Olson I.R., Marshuetz Ch. Facial Attractiveness Is Appraised in a Glance // Emotion. Vol. 5. Is. 4. December 2005. P. 498-502. 10. Patzer G.L. Looks: why they matter more than you ever imagined. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 2008. 11. Puhl R.M., Andreyeva T., Brownell K.D. Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America // International Journal of Obesity. 2008. ¹ 32. R. 992-1000. 12. Safire W. The right word in the right place at the right time: wit and wisdom from the popular «On language» column in The New York times magazine. Simon and Schuster, 2004. 13. Shaw V.F. Coping with Sexual Harassment and Gender Bias. The Rosen Publishing Group, 2000. 14. Sprague M.M., Keeling K.K. Discovering their voices: engaging adolescent girls with young adult literature. International Reading Assoc., 2007. 15. Strang J., Stimson G.V. AIDS and drug misuse: the challenge for policy and practice in the 1990s. Taylor & Francis, 1990 |