Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Evseev, V.V. The concept of the Greater Middle East from the angle of national security

Abstract: The article evaluates the Greater Middle East Concept as presented by the Administration of President Bush-junior in November 2003. It is based on the democratization and reconstruction of the Middle East and Northern Africa, where previously used US foreign policy on support of authoritarian regimes for the sake of stability and security failed. Based upon the analysis it was found out that the concept of the Greater Central Asia was to a great degree based upon the ideas of the Greater Middle East, but it was applied to a more limited region. It was shown that both concepts formed an inalienable part of the US regional policy for both the Republican and Democratic rule. It was noted that the activities of the USA led to destabilization of the situation in the Middle East and in the Central Asia, which had negative impact on the national security situation in the Russian Federation.

Keywords:

political science, East, the USA, reconstruction, democratization, Asia, Russia, security, interests, concept.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Ashimbaev M. Sovremennyy geopoliticheskaya situatsiya v Tsentral'noy Azii v kontekste interesov mirovykh i regional'nykh derzhav / Sotrudnichestvo stran Tsentral'noy Azii i SShA po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti v regione. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii // Pod red. M. Ashimbaeva i Dzh. Mennuti. – Almaty, 2005.
2. Braterskiy M.V. SShA i problemnye strany Azii: obosnovanie, vyrabotka i realizatsiya politiki v 1990 – 2005 gg. – M.: MONF – Institut SShA i Kanady RAN, 2005 g.
3. Kazantsev A.A. «Bol'shaya igra» s neizvestnymi pravilami: mirovaya politika i Tsentral'naya Aziya / Nekommercheskiy fond «Nasledie Evrazii». – M, 2008.
4. Kasaev E. Shansy demokratii v Irake // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. M., 2008. T. 6. ¹ 2.
5. Kurginyan S., Byalyy Yu., Kudinova A., Kurginyan I. i dr. Politicheskoe tsunami. Analitika sobytiy v Severnoy Afrike i na Blizhnem Vostoke / Pod red. S.Kurginyana. M.: MOF ETTs, 2011.
6. Laumulin M.T. Tsentral'naya Aziya v zarubezhnoy politologii i mirovoy politike. T. 2. Almaty, 2006.
7. Sultanov B. Partnerskie otnosheniya RK i SShA v bor'be s terrorizmom i ekstremizmom / Sotrudnichestvo stran Tsentral'noy Azii i SShA po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti v regione. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii // Pod red. M. Ashimbaeva i Dzh. Mennuti. Almaty, 2005.
8. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperatives. Basic Books (Sept., 1998).
9. Greater Middle East Partnership. Al-Hayat (Feb. 13, 2004).
10. Starr S.F. A «Greater Central Asia Partnership» for Afghanistan and Its Neighbors Silk Road Paper. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University. Washington, D.C. (March 2005).
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.