|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Gogotishvili, L. A.
Losev’s Philosophy of Language and Laruelle’s Non-Philosophy of Language
// Philosophy and Culture.
2013. ¹ 5.
P. 656-679.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62667
Gogotishvili, L. A. Losev’s Philosophy of Language and Laruelle’s Non-Philosophy of LanguageAbstract: The first part of this publication contains the overview of F. Laruelle’s speech ‘Toward Philosophy Recognized as Modern’ and its discussion during the Russian-French seminar held in Jerusalem in March 2013. The second part contains L. A. Gogotishvili’s article ‘Losev’s Philosophy of Language and Laruelle’s Non-Philosophy of Language’. A. Losev’s and F. Laruelle’s language conceptions are compared against the problem of operational-thematic expressions in philosophy. The question about whether there is a certain cause and effect relationship between viewing the language as the central operational source and the decrease of philosophy thematism is deemed to have no solution because the linguistic operationality and direct thematism have different purposes of discursive strategies. Based on the comparison of Losev’s and Laruelle’s operational principles (clipped monism and one-sided dualism), Gogotishvili reconstructs discursive strategies established by the two philosophers. Keywords: philosophy, Laruelle, Losev, thematic invention, operationality, one-sided dualism, monism, discursive strategies, eidetic language, transcendent language.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Laryuel'-Derrida-1986 — Jacques Derrida and Franzois Laruelle Controversy over the Possibility of a Science of Philosophy // Les philosophies de la diffirence, Paris: P.U.F., 1986 Translated by Ray Brassier. — http://www.onphi.net/texte-controversy-over-the-possibility-of-a-science-of-philosophy-37.html
2. Laryuel'-1987 — Francois Laruelle. The Truth According To hermes: Theorems on The secreT And communication. Perevod Alexander R. Galloway. — http://ru.scribd.com/doc/101106069/Laruelle-Francois-Truth-According-Hermes-Theorems-Secret-and-Communication 3. Laryuel'-1997 — «Slovar' ne-filosofii». Francois Laruelle Dictionnaire de la Non-Philosophie, Kimi, Paris, 1998. Angliiskii perevod Taylor Adkins) http://nsrnicek.googlepages.com/ DictionaryNonPhilosophy.pdf 4. Laryuel'-2010a — F. Laryuel'. «Marginal'nost' i messianstvo». Doklad (2 iyulya 2010 goda, Parizh) na zasedanii sovmestnoi frantsuzsko-russkoi issledovatel'skoi gruppy «RUSSKAYa I ZAPADNO-EVROPEISKAYa KUL''TURY: DIFFERENTsIAL''NYE I INTEGRAL''NYE ASPEKTY» (v kotoruyu vkhodit i avtor dannoi stat'i). 5. Laryuel'-2010b — F. Laryuel' «Predstavlenie ne-filosofii». Doklad na zasedanii sovmestnoi frantsuzsko-russkoi issledovatel'skoi gruppy (IF RAN, Moskva, 21 oktyabrya 2010 g.) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. ¹ 4. 6. Laryuel' 2012 — The Non-Philosophy Project. Essays by Francois Laruelle. Gabriel Alkon and Boris Gunjevic, editors, Telos Press Publishing. New York, 2012. Losev A.F.: 1. FM — Filosofiya imeni (1927) // http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/fil_im/intro.php// 2. DI — Dialektika mifa http://psylib.org.ua/books/losew03/index.htm 3. OASM — Ocherki antichnogo simvolizma i mifologii (1930) — http://psylib.org.ua/books/lose000/ index.htm 4. VI — Veshch' i imya // Losev A.F. Bytie. Imya. Kosmos. M.: Mysl', 1993. 5. Samoe samo. http://psylib.org.ua/books/losew04/index.htm 6. PSRI — Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1976. 7. ZSM — Znak. Simvol. Mif. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1982. 8. YaZ — Yazykovaya struktura. M., 1983. 1. Gogotishvili L.A. Nepryamoe govorenie. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2006. — NG (v tom chisle: NGa — «Eideticheskii yazyk» (rekonstruktsiya i interpretatsiya radikal'noi fenomenologicheskoi novatsii A.F. Loseva)» — http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/histan/gogotishvili/gogotishvili-eidetic.pdf i NGb — «K fenomenologii nepryamogo govoreniya» http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/histan/gogotishvili/K_phenom.pdf): «Pozitsionnaya politropiya» kak sterzhnevoi printsip losevskoi teorii vyskazyvaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. ¹ 3(27). S. 81-89; Losev, isikhazm i platonizm // Losev A. Imya. SPb: Aleteiya, 1997. 2. Gurko E. Bozhestvennaya onomatologiya. Imenovanie Boga v imyaslavii, simvolizme i dekonstruktsii. Minsk: Ekonompress, 2006. 3. Dobrokhotov A.L. Mir kak imya // Logos. 1996. ¹ 7. — http://anthropology.rinet.ru/old/7/dobroxotov.htm 4. Derrida Zhak. Vvedenie // Gusserl' Edmund. Nachalo geometrii. — http://elenakosilova.narod.ru/ studia2/husder.htm (Mayatskii M. Primechaniya k perevodu // Tam zhe). 5. Detistova A.S. Fenomenologicheskii proekt M. Rishira: fantaziya kak izmerenie fenomenologi-cheskogo // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. ¹ 6. — http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task= view&id=558&Itemid=52 6. Neretina S.S. Tropy i kontsepty. — http://philosophy.ru/iphras/library/neretina/index.html. 7. Rezvykh V. F.V.I. Shelling i A.F. Losev: Tezisy k postanovke problemy. — http://www.losev-library. ru/index.php?pid=6500. 8. Seriot P. Analyse du discours politique sovietique. (Cultures et Societes de 1’Est. 2). P.: Institut d’etudes slaves, 1985. 9. Srnicek N. Franzois Laruelle and the Non-Philosophical Tradition. — http://speculativeheresy.files. wordpress.com/2010/03/srnicek-nick-laruelle-and-the-non-philosophical-tradition.pdf. 10. Fink Oigen. Operativnye ponyatiya fenomenologii Gusserlya / per. A. Shiyan; pod red. V. Molchanova // Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. 2008 [I]. S. 361-380. 11. Shmidt A.-F. Rodovaya epistemologiya: ot Ego k «kollektivnoi intimnosti» nauki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. ¹ 5 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
