|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Khodyrev, A. A.
Organizational and Legal Forms of Public Service in France Within the Framework of
Administrative Regime
// Administrative and municipal law.
2013. ¹ 4.
P. 332-336.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62537
Khodyrev, A. A. Organizational and Legal Forms of Public Service in France Within the Framework of Administrative RegimeAbstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of organizational and legal forms of implementation of public service (le service public) in France within the framework of administrative regime, i.e. under conditions of co-existence of the two spheres of national law order, private law and administrative law. As a part of administrative regime, public administration activities were literally excluded from the scope of private laws, for instance, French Civil Code of 1804. Consequently, when disputes arise between private persons and public administration, there is always a question whether the public authority agent has acted within the framework of administrative law or private law. In the first case, administrative court will be a competent authority, and in the second case — the general jurisdiction court. The author conducts a detailed analysis of the question about delegation of public service based on the dichotomy between general (private law) regime and administrative regime through examples of public concession and affermages. Keywords: public service, public order, administrative regime, administrative jurisdiction, delegation of public service, concession, public activities, agreement, administrative court, affermage.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Bailleul D., Vers la fin de l’établissement public industriel et commercial? A propos de la transformation des EPIC en sociétés, Revue juridique de l’entreprise publique, n°629, mars 2006, pp. 105-112.
2. Delvolvé P., Le principe d’égalité devant les charges publiques, Paris, L.G.D.J., 1969. 3. Delvolvé P., Service public et libertés publiques, RFDA 1985, p. 1-11. 4. Douence J.-C. Le rattachement des établissements publics à une collectivité territoriale D, A.J.D.A., 197I. 5. Duguit L. Traité de droit constitutionnel. t. 2, Sirey, 1923. 6. Fatome E., A propos de la distinction entre les établissements publics à caractère administratif et les établissements publics à caractère industriel et commercial, in: Mélanges René Chapus, Montchrestien, 1992, pp. 171-196. 7. Gollier Chr. Le calcul du risque dans les investissements publics. Rapport du centre d’analyse Stratégique. 2011. 8. Lambert Ed. Du contrat en faveur des tiers, son fonctionnement, ses applications actuelles, cession de dettes (délégation, cession de portefeuille, cession de bail), assurance-vie, assurance-accident, contratsd’utilité publique, fondations. Paris.: A. Giard et Brière 1893. 9. Lombard M., L’établissement industriel et commercial est-il condamné ?, AJDA, 2006, pp. 79 et s. 10. Long M., Weil P., Braibant G., Delvové P, Genevois B., Les Grands Arrêts de la jurisprudence administrative, P.: Dalloz, 2007. 11. Vergès J. de Les Erreurs judiciaires (Que sais-je?) P.: PUF 2002 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
