Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Khrenov, N. A. Symbolism as a Part of the Confl ict Between Anthropomorphic and Disanthropomorphic Tendencies in Culture

Abstract: The author of the article discusses the role of symbolism as an art movement in Russian art at the turn of XXth century. Symbolism is viewed as the creation of the epoch of the Russian empire collapse and thus, the author underlines the following features of symbolism: symbolism demonstrates the gap in continuity of generations; the opposition between anthropomorphic and disanthropomorphic tendencies, between humanitarian and natural scientifi c spheres. The latter creates the gap between ‘fathers’ and ‘children’. ‘Fathers’ are viewed as positivists and ‘children’ – symbolists demonstrate their escaping into mystics, theosophy, mythology, Gnosticism and Christian personalism. It makes symbolists resemble romantics and therefore symbolism is often said to be the neoromanticism. Continuing the opposition between Art Nouveau and romanticism in XX, symbolists adopted and developed the romantic tradition.


Keywords:

cultural research, empire collapse, continuity of generations, alternative culture, anthropomorphism, disanthropomorphism, personalism, rationalism, precognition, myth.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Belyy A. Na rubezhe dvukh stoletiy. M., 1989.
2. Belyy A. Nachalo veka. M., 1990.
3. Belyy A. Rudol'f Shteyner i Gete v mirovozzrenii sovremennosti. Vospominaniya o Shteynere. M., 2000.
4. Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie. M., 1994.
5. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1989.
6. Berdyaev N. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. M., 1999.
7. Blauberg I. Anri Bergson. M., 2003.
8. Veber A. Izbrannoe: Krizis evropeyskoy kul'tury. SPb., 1999.
9. Gaydenko P. Vladimir Solov'ev i filosofiya Serebryanogo veka. M., 2001.
10. Gaym R. Gegel' i ego vremya. SPb., 2006.
11. Gaym R. Romanticheskaya shkola. Vklad v istoriyu nemetskogo uma. SPb., 2006.
12. Zedl'mayr Kh. Utrata serediny. M., 2008.
13. Ivanov V. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M., 1994.
14. Kozyrev A. Solov'ev i gnostiki. M., 2007.
15. Losev A. Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremya. M., 1990.
16. Losev A. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya. T. 1. M., 1992.
17. Lukach D. Svoeobrazie esteticheskogo. T. 1. M., 1985.
18. Markov V. Istoriya russkogo futurizma. SPb., 2000.
19. Merezhkovskiy D. L. Tolstoy i Dostoevskiy. Vechnye sputniki. M., 1995.
20. Sakulin P. Romantizm i «neoromantizm» // Vestnik Evropy. Petrograd. 1915. ¹ 3.
21. Trubetskoy E. Mirosozertsanie V. S. Solov'eva. T. 1. M., 1995.
22. Khanzen-Leve A. Russkiy simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Ranniy simvolizm. SPb., 1999.
23. Khrenov N. Smena pokoleniy v granitsakh kul'tury moderna: nadezhdy, illyuzii, real'nost' // Pokolenie v sotsiokul'turnom kontekste KhKh veka. M., 2005.
24. Khrenov N. Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura epokhi nadloma imperii v tsivilizatsionnom kontekste // Iskusstvo epokhi nadloma imperii: religioznye, natsional'nye i filosofsko-esteticheskie aspekty. M., 2010.
25. Etkind A. Khlyst. Sekty, literatura i revolyutsiya. M., 1998.
26. Yaspers K. Nitsshe. Vvedenie v ponimanie ego filosofstvovaniya. SPb., 2004