Library
|
Your profile |
History magazine - researches
Reference:
Golikov A.G.
Objective and subjective in historical
knowledge from the standpoint
of source studies
// History magazine - researches.
2012. ¹ 3.
P. 24-28.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59485
Golikov A.G. Objective and subjective in historical knowledge from the standpoint of source studiesAbstract: the article makes an attempt to answer the question of whether science can give an objective historical knowledge of past to the human societies from the positions of source studies. The author believes that while answering to this question three things must be kept in mind: not all information was recorded on the validity of the contemporaries, and even the information that was recorded, is not fully preserved, and for various reasons only partly available to scientists; historian forming the source base for the work in his own turn selects the study material that the most relevant to the goals and objectives of the study; the terms of the interests of the creators of the sources are always selective, so that historians use a subjective reference picture of the past left by his contemporaries as a research base. Overcoming this is possible on the basis of the totality of information on the events contained in the documents from the creators and publishers with different goals. Chances to recreate a more objective picture of real past increases with the use an interdisciplinary approach in the historical research and by inclusion to the source base both written and graphic materials. The task of the scientists in the search of historical objectivity is to minimize their own subjectivity. Keywords: history, historical studies, objective and subjective, historical sources, the subjective picture of the past, the repository of sources, an interdisciplinary approach, specifically, the concrete-problem method, “colored books”, satirical graphics.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Die Grundlagen der Geschichtswissenschaft. Göttingen, 1983. Blok M. Apologiya istorii, ili Remeslo istorika. M., 1973. Golikov A. G., Rybachenok I. S. Smekh – delo ser'eznoe. Rossiya i mir na rubezhe XIX–KhKh vekov v politicheskoy karikature. M., 2010. Dnevniki imperatora Nikolaya II. M., 1991. Erusalimskiy A. S. Vopros ob otvetstvennosti za voynu // Istorik-marksist. 1932. ¹ 1–2. Kareev N. Istorika (teoriya istoricheskogo znaniya). Izd.
2. Pg., 1916. Kareev N. Istoriya Zapadnoy Evropy v novoe vremya. T. 7: Istoriya Zapadnoy Evropy v nachale KhKh stoletiya (1901–1914). Ch. 1. Pg., 1916. Koval'chenko I.D. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya. Izd. 2. M., 2003. Liven D. Rossiyskaya imperiya i ee vragi s XVI veka do nashikh dney. M., 2007. Teylor A. Bor'ba za gospodstvo v Evrope. 1848–1918. M., 1958 |