Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Marchenko, F. O. Psychological Issues of Evaluation of Child’s TV Programs Quality

Abstract: The article analyzes approaches to studying cognitive and social effects of TV shows. Usual researches are driven by both pragmatic tasks of child’s TV as well as the current social conjuncture. But such researches do not take into account a number of very important indicators of child development: perception, memory, cogitation, personal and social identity. Russian theories of psychological development would actually expand the methodological and theoretical basis of such researches studying the efficiency of TV shows for children.

Keywords:

psychology, socialization, cultivation, social learning, cognitive development, reading skills, attention, emotions, methods, evaluation criteria.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Abramenkova V.V. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya detstva. M.: Per Se, 2008.
2. Vintkrkhoff-Shpurk P. Mediapsikhologiya. Osnovnye printsipy. Khar'kov: Gumanitarnyy tsentr, 2007.
3. Lemish D. Zhertvy ekrana. Vliyanie televideniya na razvitie detey. M.: Pokolenie, 2007.
4. Makhovskaya O.I., Mirnyy A. Deti v usloviyakh narastayushchego sotsial'nogo rassloeniya i kul'turnogo raz-noobraziya // Prikladnaya psikhologiya. 2006. ¹ 6 (3).
5. Makhovskaya O.I. Kommunikativnyy opyt lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo «Institut Psikhologii RAN», 2010.
6. Marchenko O.F., Makhovskaya O.I. Metodologicheskie problemy otsenki effektivnosti sotsial'nykh proektov // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2009. ¹ 7 (10).
7. Kaptelinin V., Nardie B. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge: MIT, 2006.
8. Yurevich A.V., Marchenko F.O. Obraz telezritelya v sotsial'no-psikhologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. Vozdeystvie i protivodeystvie. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2011.
9. Anderson D.R. &Field D.E. Die Aufmerksamkeit des KindesbeimFernsehen: Folgerungenfuer die Programmproduktion. In: Meyer (Hrsg.), M. Wieverstehen Kinder Fernsehprogramme (s. 52-92). Muenchen: Saur, 1984.
10. Anderson D.R., Field D.E., Collins P.A., Lorch E.P. & Nathan J.G. Estimates of young children’s time with television: A methodological comparison of parents reports with — time-lapse home observation / Child Development 56, 1985.
11. Bente G. & Fromm B. Affektfernsehen. Motive, Angebotsweisen und Wirkungen. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1997.
12. Brosius H.B. Mythen in der Wirkungsforschung: Auf der Suchenachdem Stimulus-Response-Modell. Publizistik 43 (4), 1998.
13. Condry J. The psychology of television. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum, 1989.
14. Delmar R. &Nowell-Smith G. Watching “teszelin”. In: Simpson (Hrsg.), P. Parents talking television (S. 11-18). London: Comedia, 1987.
15. Ekman P. & Friesen W.V. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1, 1969. P. 49-98.
16. Fiske S.T. Social Cognition and Social Perception/ Annual Review of Psychology 44, 1993.
17. Frijda N.H. The laws of emotion. American Psychologist 43, 1988.
18. Key W.B. The age of manipulation. N.Y.: Holt, 1989.
19. Lasswell H.D. Propaganda technique in the world war. N.Y.: Knopf. 1927.
20. McIlwraith R.D. “I’am addicted to television”: The personality, imagination, and TV watching patterns of self-identified TV addicts. Journal of Broadcasting &Electronic Media 42, 1998.
21. Meringoff L.K. Influence of the medium on children’s story apprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 72, 1980. P. 240-249.
22. Merten J. & Krause R. DAS (DifferentielleAffektskala). Arbeitein der FachrichtungPsychologie, 173. SaarbrueckenUniversitaet des Saarlandes, 1993.
23. Meyrowits J. Multiple media literacies. Journal of Communication, 48 (1). 1985.
24. Montada L. Die geistigeEntwicklungaus der Sicht Jean Piagets/Muenchen: Urban and Schwarzenberg. 1982.
25. Michel B. Emotionenbei der Rezaption von TV-Nachrichten. Universitaet Saarbruecken: Unveroeffentlichte Diplomarbeit, 2002.
26. Mikunda C. Kino spueren. Strategien der emotionalen Filmgestaltung. Muenchen: Filmland Presse, 2003.
27. Phillips D.P. Teenage and adult temporal fluctuation in suicide and auto fatalities/ In:Suicide in the young. Boston: John Wright, 1984.
28. Postman N. The disappearence of childhood. N.Y.: Delacorte. 1982.
29. Quarfoth J.M. Children’s understanding of the nature of television characters. Journal of Communications 29 (3), 1979.
30. Rice M.L., Huston A.C., Truglio R.& Wright J. Words from “Sesame Street”: Learning vocabulary while viewing. Developmental Psychology 26 (3), 1990.
31. Salomon G. Cognitive skills learning across cultures. Journal of Communication, 26, 1976.
32. Salomon G. Television Watching and Mental Effort: A Social Psychological View. In: J. Bryant & D.R & Anderson (Hrsg.), Children’s Understanding of Television. New York: Academic, 1977.
33. Sprafkin J.N., Gadow K. & Abelman R. Television and the exceptional child: A forgotten audience. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 1992.
34. Stipp H. Neue Techniken. Neue Zuschauer? Media Perspektiven 3, 1989.
35. Van Evra J. Television and child development. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum, 1990.
36. Van Evra J. Television and child development. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Eribaum Associates. 1997.
37. Winn M. The plug-in drug: Television, children, and the family. N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1977.
38. Zohoori A. A cross-cultural analysis of children’s TV use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1988.
39. Zillmann D & Cantor J.R. Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 1977
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.