Library
|
Your profile |
National Security
Reference:
Davydov, L.V.
Confl ict nature of civil society and security.
// National Security.
2011. ¹ 6.
P. 161-174.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58999
Davydov, L.V. Confl ict nature of civil society and security.Abstract: The modern civil society is a confl ict-dangerous social apparatus, which includes collisions of various interest, and these collisions may be capped by various means of protection of one type of interests from contradicting interests. The attempts of the state to fi nd conceptual grounds for the strategy of protection of vital interests and to introduce it face the diffi culties, which are related to the society itself. The society with private property includes opposing interests, and their clash inevitably leads to the clash between danger and security. As a result of the confl ict of interests the parties, for whom the relation is secure and dangerous fi nd compromise and temporary agreement, on what to consider secure or dangerous. The confl ict as means of achievement of security of one group and danger for another group is measure of danger, compromise is a measure of security. Keywords: political science, opposing, interests, relations, society, individual, confl ict, compromise, security, management, government.
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Balatskiy E.V. Faktory udovletvorennosti zhizn'yu: izmerenie i integral'nye pokazateli //
2. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya. 2005. ¹4. 3. Darendorf R. Sovremennyy sotsial'nyy konflikt: Ocherk politiki svobody. – M.: ROSSMEN, 4. 2002. 5. Lukin V.N. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v global'nom mire: politicheskiy analiz problem i strategiy 6. razvitiya. Sankt-Peterburg.: Nauka, 2005. 7. Marks K. i Engel's F. Nemetskaya ideologiya / K. Marks i F. Engel's Izbr. soch. v 9-ti tomakh. M.: Izd-vo 8. polit. literat. T. 2. 1985. 9. Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoy filosofii prava / K. Marks i F. Engel's Sob. soch., Izdanie vtoroe. 10. M.: Gos. izd-vo polit. literat. T. 1, 1955. 11. Marks K. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii / K. Marks i F. Engel's Sob. soch., Izdanie vtoroe. 12. M.: Gos. izd-vo polit. literat. T. 23. 1960. 13. Nagaychuk A.F. Sotsial'nye interesy: tekhnologii osushchestvleniya v politike. SPb.: Izd-vo S.- 14. Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2005. 15. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' Rossii: doktrina i real'nost' // POLITEKS=POLITEX: Politicheskaya 16. ekspertiza: Al'manakh. Vyp. 2. – SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Petrb. un-ta, 2005. 17. Rybalkin N.N. Priroda bezopasnosti / Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 18. ¹5. 2003. 19. Tokareva O. Udovletvorennost' zhizn'yu – ot chego ona zavisit? // Elektronnyy resurs: Synderesis. Vzglyani 20. na zhizn' po-novomu! // http://synderesis.ru/2011/07/udovletvorennost-zhiznyu-ot-chego-ona-zavisit/ 21. Udovletvorennost' zhizn'yu – eto vopros politicheskoy orientatsii / Elektronnyy resurs: Gumanitarnoe 22. razvitie v Rossii i za rubezhom. Ekspertno-analiticheskiy portal // gt.market // //gtmarket.ru/news/ 23. culture/2007/10/05/1417 / 05.10.2007. 24. Udovletvorennost' zhizn'yu i dokhod / Elektronnyy resurs: Meditsinskiy blog. / Dobavleno 29 maya 25. 2011 /://locrox.com/udovletvorennost-zhiznyu-i-doxod 26. Frolov A. Daesh'! Kto i kak «stryapaet» mirnuyu revolyutsiyu? / Sovetskaya Rossiya, 22 oktyabrya 2011. 27. Yakovlev I. Chto takoe schast'e, mozhno li i kak ego izmerit'? / Elektronnyy resurs: Spa.su / 19.12.2008 28. / http://www.spa.su/rus/content/view/133/778/0/ |