Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

Gurevich, P. S. Tortures of a Dialogue (about M. M. Bakhtin’s Creative Work)

Abstract: The author analyzes American critical works dedicated to M. M. Bakhtin’s publications. The author notes that American literature gives a high appraisal of the Russian philosopher’s ideas. At the same time the author underlines inadequacy and narrowness of some conclusions made by American literature experts.


Keywords:

philology, literature, history, philosophy, dialogue, assumption, polyphony, text, characters, heuristics.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Bakhtin M.M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. — M., 1979.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. — M., 1986.
3. Volgin I.L. «Dnevnik pisatelya»: tekst i kontekst. Dostoevskiy: materialy i issledovaniya. T. 3. — L., 1978.
4. Makhlin V.L., Nasledie M.M. Bakhtina v sovremennom zarubezhnom literaturovedenii. Seriya literatury i yazyka. T. 45. — ¹ 4. — M., 1966.
5. Sokh R.L. Between earth and heaven: Shakespeare, Dostoevsky and the meaning of the Christian tragedy. — N.Y., 1987.
6. Tunimanov V.A. Publitsistika Dostoevskogo: «Dnevnik pisatelya». Dostoevskiy — khudozhnik i myslitel'». — M., 1972.
7. Cabat G.C. Ideology and imagination. — N.Y., 1978.
8. Dostoevsky: A collection of critical essays. — N.Y., 1962.
9. Jackson R. The art of Dostoevsky: Deliriums and nocturnes. — Princeton, 1981.
10. Muchnic H. Dostoevsky’s English reputation (1881-1936). — Mass, 1939.
11. Rowe W.W. «Crime and punishment» and «The Brothers Karamazov»; Some comparative observations» // Russian Literary trignarterly. Ann Arbor. — 1974. — ¹ 10. — P. 331-342.
12. Weisgerber J. Faulkner et Dostoevsky. Influence and confluence. — Athens, 1974