Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Spirova, E. M. Kula and Potlatch: Psychological Meaning (Sign, Symbol and Simulacrum in Jean Baudrillard’s Interpretation)

Abstract: French philosopher Jean Baudrillard pays signification attention at differentiation of the terms ‘sign’, ‘symbol’ and ‘simulacrum’. The attribute which allows to differentiate these terms is their relation to objectivity. According to the author, a sign is always objective and refers to objectivity. Symbol is objective but does not refer to objectivity. Simulacrum tears apart the connection between a sign and objectivity.

Keywords:

philosophy, psychology, sign, objectivity, symbol, simulacrum, ideology, sociality, message, exchange.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Bodriyyar Zh. K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii znaka. M., 2007.
2. Bodriyyar Zh. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert'. M., 2006.
3. Zenkin S.N. Zhan Bodriyyar: vremya simulyakrov // Bodriyyar Zh. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert'. M., 2006. S. 7-8.
4. Ivanyuk I. Kula i potlach // Literaturnaya gazeta. 2011. ¹ 22. S. 2.
5. Kutyrev V.A. Bytie ili nichto. SPb., 2010.
6. Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. SPb., 1995.
7. Yung K.G. Simvoly transformatsii. M., 2000.
8. Damon F.H. The Kula and Generalised Exchange: Considering some Unconsidered Aspects of the Elementary Structures of Kinship // Man (new series). 1980. ¹ 15. S. 280
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.