Common Ground for Delimitation of Jurisdiction between Court of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration
Court in Accordance with the Russian Applicable Legislation.


	Administrative and municipal law Reference: Nechaeva S.V. Common Ground for Delimitation of Jurisdiction between Court of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration Court in Accordance with the Russian Applicable Legislation. // Administrative and municipal law. 2010. № 11. P. 5-9. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57732 Nechaeva S.V. Common Ground for Delimitation of Jurisdiction between Court of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration Court in Accordance with the Russian Applicable Legislation. Abstract: The question on common grounds for delimitation of jurisdiction between court of general jurisdiction and arbitration court has a great importance for academic and research spheres because the problem of delimitation of jurisdiction is often met in law enforcement practice. The author analyzes points of view expressed in legal literature regarding the most controversial aspects of the problem including the question about structural adequacy of the material and procedural aspects of the law and judicial service; about the relation between the object and subject of grounds for delimitation of jurisdiction between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. Keywords: arbitral procedure, arbitration court, civil procedure, civil law, delimitation of jurisdiction, subjective content of a dispute, court of general jurisdiction, economic dispute This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register References 1. Andreeva T.K. Arbitrazhnye sudy v sudebnoy sisteme RF // Zhurnal Otechestvennye zapiski. — 2003. — № 2 (11). 2. Vavilin E.V. Vystuplenie na nauchno-metodologicheskom seminare «Yuridicheskiy protsess — problemy metodologii» // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. — 2004. — № 2. 3. Eliseev N.G. Razreshenie kolliziy podvedomstvennosti // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2007. 4. Zaytsev I.M. O kontseptsiyakh khozyaystvennogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo prava // Voprosy teorii i praktiki grazhdanskogo protsessa: Mezhvuzovskiy nauchnyy sbornik. Vyp. 2. — Saratov, 1979. 5. Kallistratova R.F. K voprosu ob uchastnikakh arbitrazhnogo protsessa // Uchenye zapiski VIYuN. Vyp. 17. — M., 1963. 6. Kleandrov M.I. Ekonomicheskoe pravosudie v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. — M., 2006. 7. Kozlova V.N. K voprosu ob opredelenii podvedomstvennosti del arbitrazhnomu sudu // Nalogi. — 2010. — № 2. 8. Kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu RF (postateynyy). 2-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / Pod red. P.V. Krasheninnikova. — M., 2009. 9. Popondopulo V.F. Sistema tret'ey vlasti: ot gorizontal'noy organizatsii k vertikal'noy // Zakon. — 2004. — № 10. 10. Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v arbitrazhnykh sudakh. Chast' pervaya // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2010. — № 1.

Journals

Books

Nechaeva S.V. Common Ground for Delimitation of Jurisdiction between Court of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration Court in Accordance with the Russian Applicable Legislation.