|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Kutyrev, V. A.
Reconstruction of Human
// Philosophy and Culture.
2010. ¹ 1.
P. 19-26.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57171
Kutyrev, V. A. Reconstruction of HumanAbstract: We live in the epoch of human engineering turning into an ‘engineering’ human. Undoubtedly, such Human has a certain future which may last for several centuries. ‘Traditional’ or ‘historical’ human has all his future in the past. He has only eternity. Conservative revolution under the banner of Archaeo Avantgarde is the main business of the day at the 21st century. All the rest is the ‘business of the night’. Thus shall we live further. Keywords: philosophy, human, personality, God, nature, subject, future, individual, engineering, metaphysics
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Azhezh Klod. Chelovek govoryashchiy. M., 2003.
2. Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. M., 1996. 3. Gumanologiya. Ocherki novoy distsipliny // Nauki o cheloveke. Filosofskiy vek. Al'manakh. Vyp. 21. SPb., 2002. 4. Delez Zh. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Kanta: uchenie o sposobnostyakh. Bergsonizm. Spinoza. M., 2000. 5. Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M.-Ekaterinburg, 1998. 6. Delez Zh. Nitsshe. SPb, 2001. 7. Delez Zh. O prevoskhodstve anglo-amerikanskoy literatury // Logos. — 1999. — ¹2. — S.100. 8. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya? SPb, 1998. 9. Dugin A. Homo novissimus // Chelovek. — 2004. — ¹1. 10. Podoroga V. Epokha Corpus-a? Voprosy i nabroski k besede s Zh.L. Nansi // Nansi Zh.L. Corpus. M., 1999. S. 216. 11. Smirnov S.A. Sovremennaya antropologiya. Analiticheskiy obzor // Chelovek. 2003. ¹ 5. S. 92-93. 12. Tul'chinskiy G.L. Postchelovecheskaya personologiya. Novye perspektivy svobody i ratsional'nosti. SPb, 2002. 13. Khoruzhiy S.S. Zametki k energiynoy antropologii. «Dukhovnaya praktika» i «otverzanie chuvstv»: dva kontsepta v sravnitel'noy perspektive // Voprosy filosofii. — 1999. — ¹ 3. 14. Khoruzhiy S.S. K antropologicheskoy modeli tret'ego tysyacheletiya // Filosofskie nauki. M., 2003. Vyp. 8. S. 134. 15. Epshteyn M. Debut de siecle. Ot post k proto. Manifest Novogo mira // Znamya. 2001. ¹ 5. 16. Latour B. The trouble with actor–network theory // Soziale Welt. — Gottingen, 1996. Jg. 47, H. 4. S. 374. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
