Library
|
Your profile |
Politics and Society
Reference:
Korneeva E.Yu.
Comparative analysis of the main modern regional integrational unions
// Politics and Society.
2016. ¹ 2.
P. 172-185.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54517
Korneeva E.Yu. Comparative analysis of the main modern regional integrational unionsAbstract: The subject of this research is the regional integrational processes and the key regional integrational unions in the modern world: European Union, MERCOSUR, CIS, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, and North American Free Trade Agreement. A constructive theoretical understanding of the integrational processes is closely connected to the analysis of the European integration which for a long time was an example followed by other integrations. However, with the appearance of the new regional integrational unions in the other parts of the world and the established political and economic issues of the EU, emerges a question of canonicity of the said integrational project. The author makes a conclusion that integration should not be narrowed down to the only EU style and consider the rest as an unworthy “initiative” that is doomed to assimilate with the European type of integration or die before being accomplished. The absence of the canonic standard of integration can serve as alternative option. This analysis represents an applied importance for the post-Soviet space with such dying integrational union as CIS and the newly formed Eurasian Economic Union. The author believes that it is important to base on the experience of the Western and Eastern countries in development of the integrational project, but take into account the uniqueness of a certain region and goals of the participants. Keywords: integratsionnye ob'edineniya, integratsionnye protsessy, ES, NAFTA, MERKOSUR, integratsiya ES, integratsiya, mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Integratsionnye protsessy v sovremennom mire: Uchebnoe posobie / A.S. Manykin, A.V. Malygin, N.N. Naumova, A.A. Sidorov. Pod red. A.S. Manykina. – M: MAKS Press, 2005.
2. Globalistika: Entsiklopediya, Gl. red. I.I. Mazur, A.N. Chumakov. M., 2003. 3. Evropeyskaya integratsiya: uchebnik / pod.red. O.V. Butorinoy. – M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Delovaya literatura», 2011. 4. Baykov A.A. Sravnitel'naya integratsiya. Praktika i modeli integratsii v zarubezhnoy Evrope i Tikhookeanskoy Azii. M. 2012. 5. Pivovarov E.I. Postsovetskoe prostranstvo: al'ternativy integratsii. Istoricheskiy ocherk. SPb, 2008. 6. B. Khokman, M. Shiff. Poluchenie vygod ot regional'noy integratsii. Elektronnyy resurs: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Pubs/Handbook_rs_Hoekman-Schiff_ch55.pdf 7. CIA World Factbook 2013. Appendix B: International Organizations and Groups. Elektronnyy resurs: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/print_AppendixB.pdf 8. Sovremennaya mirovaya politika: Prikladnoy analiz. Otv. red. A.D. Bogaturov. M. 2010. S. 538. 9. Borko Yu.A. Ot evropeyskoy idei – k edinoy Evrope. – M., 2003. 10. Brugmans H. L’idee europeenne, 1920-1970. Bruges, 1970. 11. Kuvaldin V.B. Global'nyy mir: ekonomika, politika, mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: ucheb. posobie. MShE MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova. – M., 2009. Str. 44. 12. Glinkin A.I., Kuz'min V.V., Lavut A.A. Integratsiya v Zapadnom polusharii i Rossiya. M. 2004. S. 91-92. 13. Kireeva N.V. Mekhanizm obrazovaniya integratsionnykh svyazey // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 61 - 68. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9788. 14. Kireeva N.V. Ponyatie tselostnosti v sistemnoy teorii mezhdunarodnoy integratsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1389 - 1397. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.10200. |