Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Zobnin A.V. Paradoxology of choice: choice in the conditions of paradoxicality and uncertainty

Abstract: The subject of this research is the human choice in the conditions of paradoxicality, compared in the series of reviewed precedents with the uncertainty and risk. A special attention is given to the choice in the area of public and political relations. Rational and intuitive choice is being analyzed from the perspective of the influence of rational-logical paradoxes, freedom of choice paradox, and limited choice paradox. The author also draws attention to the examination of the restrictions of human choice, which include gender, rational, procedural, situational, intuitive, etc. The article presents the examples of human choice within the world history and modern political sphere. The scientific novelty of the conducted research consists in the author’s approach towards formation of the analytical spatial model – “foundations/criteria/terms of choice”, which would reflect key variables of the analysis of human choice with the focus upon the information-analytical component of the process. The author also concludes that the intuitive choice requires moderate and rational optimization, which can be achieved by using the information-analytical methodologies of increasing the fullness and structuring of information that lay at the core of the rational choice.

Keywords:

manipulation of choice, paradox of choice, limitation of choice, uncertainty, choice, paradoxology, paradox, intuitive choice, rational choice, freedom of choice

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Schwartz B., Ward A., Monterosso J., Lyubomirsky S., White K., Lehman D.R. Maximizing versus Satisfying: Happiness Is a Matter of Choice // Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 83. ¹ 5. P. 1178-1197.
2. Schwartz B. Self-Determination: The Tyranny of Freedom // American Psychologist. 2000. Vol. 55. ¹ 1. P. 79-88.
3. Schulte P. Universal Vision or Bounded Rationality // International Affairs. 2007. Vol. 83. ¹ 3. P. 501-510.
4. Saari D.G. Disposing Dictators, Demystifying Voting Paradoxes: Social Choice Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
5. Rosenstiel L. von. Kommunikation und Fuehrung in Arbeitsgruppen // Lehrbuch Organisations Psychologie / H. Schuler (Hrsg.). Bern: Huber, 1993. S. 321-351.
6. Nitzan S. The Vulnerability of Point-voting Schemes to Preference Variation and Strategic Manipulation // Public Choice. 1985. Vol. 47. ¹ 2. P. 349-370.
7. New Oxford American Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
8. Nanson E.J. Methods of Election // Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 1882. Vol. 18. P. 197-240.
9. NEISS Data Highlights – 1998 // Consumer Product Safety Review. Fall 1999.
10. Laffond G., Laine J. Condorcet Choice and the Ostrogorski Paradox // Social Choice Welfare. 2009. Vol. 32. P. 317-333.
11. Lewicki P., Hill T., Czyzewska M. Nonconscious Acquisition of Information // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47. P. 796-801.
12. Jenkins-Smith H. Professional Roles of Policy Analysts // Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1982. ¹ 2. P. 88-100.
13. Kelly J. Almost All Social Choice Rules are Highly Manipulable, but Few aren’t // Social Choice and Welfare. 1993. ¹ 10. P. 161-175.
14. Janis I.L. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1982.
15. Howard N. Drama Theory and Its Relation to Game Theory // Group Decision and Negotiation. 1994. ¹ 3. P. 207-235.
16. Howard N. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1971.
17. Gibbard A. Social Choice and the Arrow Conditions. For the Joint Seminar of Kenneth Arrow, John Rowls, and Amartya Sen. Harvard University, Autumn Semester, 1968-69. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2010.
18. Gibbard A. Thinking How to Live. N.Y.; London: Harvard University Press, 2003.
19. Gibbard A. Manipulation of Schemes that Mix Voting with Chance// Econometrica. 1977. Vol. 45. ¹ 3. P. 665-681.
20. Gibbard A. Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result // Econometrica. 1973. Vol. 41. July. P. 587-601.
21. Condorcet M de. Essaisurl’application de l’analyse a la probabilite des decision rendues a la pluralite des voix. Paris, 1785.
22. Arrow K.J. Freedom and Social Choice: Notes in the Margin // Utilitas. 2006. Vol. 18. ¹ 1. P. 52-60.
23. Arrow K.J. General Economic Equilibrium: Purpose, Analytic Techniques, Collective Choice. Nobel Memorial Lecture, December 12, 1972// Nobel Lectures, Economics 1969-1980 / Ed. by Assar Lindbeck. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 1992. P. 109-131.
24. Arrow K.J. On a Theorem of Arrow: Comment // Review of Economic Studies. 1974. July. P. 487-488.
25. Arrow K. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.
26. Errou K. Kollektivnyi vybor i individual'nye tsennosti / Nauch. red., avt. predisl., poslesl. F.T. Aleskerov. M.: Izdatel'skii dom GU VShE, 2004.
27. Shapiro I. Begstvo ot real'nosti v gumanitarnykh naukakh. M.: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2011.
28. Errou K. Vospriyatie riska v psikhologii i ekonomike // THESIS. 1994. Vyp. 5. S. 81-90.
29. Filinov N.B. Razrabotka i prinyatie upravlencheskikh reshenii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: INFRA-M, 2009.
30. Sergeevich V.I. Veche i knyaz'. Russkoe gosudarstvennoe ustroistvo i upravlenie vo vremena Ryurikovichei // Institut vyborov v istorii Rossii. M.: Norma, 2001. S. 36-37.
31. Sekei G. Paradoksy v teorii veroyatnostei i matematicheskoi statistike. M.: Mir, 1990.
32. Saimon G.A. Ratsional'nost' kak protsess i produkt myshleniya // THESIS. 1993. Vyp. 3. S. 16-38.
33. Pis'ma Pliniya Mladshego. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1982.
34. Raifa G. Analiz reshenii: vvedenie v problemu vybora v usloviyakh neopredelennosti. M.: Nauka, 1977.
35. O chem dumayut ekonomisty: Besedy s nobelevskimi laureatami / Pod red. P. Samuel'sona, U. Barnetta. M.: OOO «Yunaited Press», 2010.
36. Neiman Dzh. fon., Morgenshtern O. Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie. M.: Nauka, 1970.
37. Mulen E. Kooperativnoe prinyatie reshenii: aksiomy i modeli. M.: Mir, 1991.
38. Mirkin B.G. Problemy gruppovogo vybora. M.: Nauka, 1974.
39. Mikhel'son A.D. Ob''yasnenie 25000 inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v upotreblenie v russkii yazyk, s oznacheniem ikh kornei. M.: Izdanie knigoprodavtsa A.I. Manukhina, 1865.
40. Maiers D. Intuitsiya. SPb.: Piter, 2013.
41. Lezina Z.M., Vol'skii V.I. Sravnitel'nyi analiz protsedur golosovaniya (obzor problemy i novye zadachi) // Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 1992. ¹ 2. S. 3-29.
42. Lezina Z.M. Manipulirovanie vyborom variantov // Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 1992. ¹ 4. S. 5-22.
43. Lezina Z.M. Protsedury kollektivnogo vybora // Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 1987. ¹ 8. S. 3-35.
44. Lafta Dzh.K. Upravlencheskie resheniya. M.: Tsentr ekonomiki i marketinga, 2002.
45. Kaneman D., Slovik P., Tverski A. Prinyatie reshenii v neopredelennosti: Pravila i predubezhdeniya. Khar'kov: Izdatel'stvo Institut prikladnoi psikhologii «Gumanitarnyi tsentr», 2005.
46. Kaneman D., Tverski A. Ratsional'nyi vybor, tsennosti i freimy // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. ¹4. S. 31-42.
47. Zobnin A.V. Ratsional'nyi vybor – eto mif?! Paradoks ogranichennogo vybora v sisteme paradoksov: konspekt lektsii. Ivanovo: Izdatel'stvo IGIKM im. D.G. Burylina, 2014.
48. Zobnin A.V. Mezhdunarodnye psevdokonsul'tatsii v strukturakh Organizatsii Varshavskogo dogovora // Politika i obshchestvo. 2013. ¹8. S. 1021-1028.
49. Zobnin A.V. Mezhdu organizatsionnoi protseduroi i kollektivnym vyborom: «paradoks ogranichennogo vybora» v mezhdunarodnykh konsul'tatsiyakh // Labirint. Zhurnal sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh issledovanii. 2013. ¹3. S. 111-123.
50. Zobnin A.V. Problema manipulirovaniya v khode mezhdunarodnykh konsul'tatsii // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T. 11. 2013. ¹1. S. 16-28.
51. Zobnin A.V. Teoriya i metodologiya analiza mezhdunarodnykh konsul'tatsii v mezhdunarodnykh mezhpravitel'stvennykh organizatsiyakh. Ivanovo: Izdatel'stvo «Ivanovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet», 2013.
52. Zobnin A.V. Informatsionno-analiticheskaya rabota v gosudarstvennom i munitsipal'nom upravlenii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Vuzovskii uchebnik, INFRA-M, 2011.
53. Zobnin A.V. Teoriya i metodologiya analiza mezhdunarodnykh konsul'tatsii. Ivanovo: Izdatel'stvo «Ivanovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet», 2008.
54. Ganeev B.T. Paradoks: paradoksal'nye vyskazyvaniya. Ufa: BGPU, 2001.
55. Aleskerov F.T., Khabina E.L., Shvarts D.A. Binarnye otnosheniya, grafy i kollektivnye resheniya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Izdatel'skii dom GU VShE, 2006.
56. Akoff R. Iskusstvo resheniya problem. M.: Mir, 1982.
57. Aleskerov F.T., Aizerman M.A. Vybor variantov: osnovy teorii. M.: Nauka, 1990.
58. Schwartz B. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. N.Y.: Harper Collins, 2004.
59. Schwartz B., Markus H.R. Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being // Journal of Consumer Research. 2010. Vol. 37. August. P. 344-355.
60. Schwartz B., Ben-Haim Y., Dacso C. What Makes a Good Decision? Robust Satisficing as a Normative Standard of Rational Decision Making // Journal for the Theory of Social Behavioral. 2010. Vol. 41. ¹ 2. P.209-227.
61. Sternberg R.J., Luburt T.I. An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development // Human Development. 1991. Vol. 34. P. 1-31.
62. Suzumura K. Remarks on the Theory of Collective Choice // Economica. 1976. Vol. 43. November. P. 381-390.
63. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment // Psychological Review. 1983. Vol. 90. P. 293-315.
64. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992. ¹ 5. P. 297-323.
65. Zobnin A.V. Paradosso Scelta Limitata // Italian Science Review. 2014. ¹ 4 (13). P. 354-356.
66. Gerasimova I.A. Prinyatie resheniya: logika i psikhologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-11.-C. 1055-1065. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.11.10209.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.