Library
|
Your profile |
Politics and Society
Reference:
Shen Y.
Turkish-Russian Relations after Coming to Power of the New Political Elites (2002-2013)
// Politics and Society.
2015. ¹ 7.
P. 889-900.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54412
Shen Y. Turkish-Russian Relations after Coming to Power of the New Political Elites (2002-2013)Abstract: The subject of the article is the analysis of the problematic points of Eurasian integration in Russian and Turkish foreign policy in the period of 2002-2013. The object of the study are the Turkish-Russian relations in the period of 2002-2013. The present article compares the approaches of Russian and Turkish foreign policy to the major problems of the Eurasian concept and also analyses the potential possibility of cooperation of these countries in particular regions when solving particular problems. From the author's point of view, it is necessary to highlight four basic regions where Russian and Turkish interests overlap: the Black Sea region, Western world, Middle East and Caucasus. Methodologically the research is based on the principle of historicism. The author of the work adhered to the principle of scientific objectiveness, the method of comparative historical analysis and problematic chronological induction. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that Turkey, which is in fact tellurocratic, receives a historical chance to make an alliance with Russia that is referred to as a thalassocratic power. This, perhaps, will have a global impact on the geopolitical theory and will even allow to reconsider Russia as a sea power. Russia possesses the Northern Sea Route, access to the Black Sea, the Pacific Ocean, and Turkey can provide trade and economic safety of the Mediterranean route. The alliance of the successors of the two former empires will to a large extent influence future structure, economic and political order in Eurasia due to the balance and re-consideration of the geopolitical types of tellurocracy and thalassocracy. The main conclusions of the study are as follows: 1. Especially since 2002 there has been increased interest to the Osman past in Turkey. A new quasi-imperial thinking of neo-osmanists has been formed, that was established on a ground prepared by the islamisation of the public space. However, there are no historical and political reasons for that in modern Turkey. At the same time, Erdogan's Turkey still aspires to be the leader of the Sunni world. Since the system instability in Arab countries has begun in 2010, Turkey has been rejecting the "Zero problems with our neighbours" policy, actively supporting the processes going on in Arab countries, explaining, that those are the steps towards democracy. However, in general it appeared that Ankara's new policy has no prospects. 2. Balance of supply and demand for energy sources established between Turkey and Russia laid a right foundation for the creation of long-term relations between the two countries. Under such conditions the Turkish government has always outlined that close approach to Russia is defined by rational calculations, not by narrow nationalistic reasons. Keywords: EU, NATO, JDP, Arab spring, Montreux Convention, neo-osmanism, Middle East, Caucasus, Eurasian concept, Western world
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Andrichenko L.V., Postnikov A.E. Modelirovanie zakonov sub''ekta Rossiiskoi Federatsii v oblasti zashchity naseleniya i territorii ot chrezvychainykh situatsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law.-2014.-6.-C. 980-1002.
2. Yag'ya V.S. Solomina D.V. Otnosheniya Rossii i Turtsii v XXI veke: tendentsii i trudnosti // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser.6, Filosofiya, kul'turologiya, politologiya, pravo, mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014. ¹ 1. 3. Yag'ya V. S. Turtsiya v sovremennoi sisteme mirovoi politiki // Aktual'nye problemy mirovoi politiki v XXI veke. SPb., 2011. 4. Yag'ya V. S. Rossiisko-turetskie otnosheniya i Kavkaz v XXI v. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya v sovremennom mire: politika i kul'tura. SPb: IPK KOSTA, 2010. 5. Shen I. N. Chernomorskie prolivy i rossiisko-turetskie otnosheniya posle kholodnoi voiny: Magisterskaya dissertatsiya. M.: RUDN, 2011. 6. Yag'ya V. S . Puti – pereput'ya sovremennoi Turtsii // Aktual'nye problemy mirovoi politiki v XXI veke, SPb: Izd-vo «Nestor-Istoriya», 2009, vyp.4. 7. Shen I. N. Rol' regional'nykh i mirovykh stran v politike stran chernomorskogo basseina posle kholodnoi voiny // Istoricheskie, kul'turnye i ekonomicheskie svyazi mezhdu Turtsiei i Rossiei: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi simpoziuma (Stambul, 5 aprelya 2012 g.). M., Stambul: Stambul'skii universitet, 2012. 8. Shashina N. S., Shen I. N. Strategiya razvitiya rossiisko-turetskikh otnoshenii // Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2013. ¹ 12(98). 9. Ul'gen S. Mesto pod solntsem ili pyatnadtsat' minut slavy? Novyi vneshnepoliticheskii kurs Turtsii. Mosk. Tsentr Karnegi. M., 2011. 10. Ul'chenko N. Yu., Shlykov P. V. Dinamika rossiisko-turetskikh otnoshenii v usloviyakh narastaniya global'noi nestabil'nosti / pod. Red. V.V. Naumkina. M.: IVRAN, 2014. 11. Uisal G. A. Turetsko-rossiiskoe otnosheniya na rubezhe KhKhI veka (1991-2008 gg.). M., 2009. 12. Trofimov A. Geopoliticheskie ustremleniya islamskikh gosudarstv Blizhnego i Srednego Vostoka v otnoshenii musul'manskikh regionov Rossii // Institut izucheniya Izrailya i Blizhnego Vostoka.// URL:http://www.iimes.ru/rus/stat/2002/24-09-02.htm. 13. Simavoryan A. Ideologicheskie techeniya v kontekste vneshnei politiki Turtsii. Fond «Noravank»// URL: http://www.noravank.am/rus/issues/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=12786 14. Stenogramma nachala vstrechi Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii D.A. Medvedeva s Prem'er-ministrom Turetskoi Respubliki R.T. Erdoganom / URL: http://www.turkey.mid.ru /hron/hronika171.html 15. Reglament o poryadke morskogo sudokhodstva v zone Prolivov i Mramornogo morya ot 1994 goda. 16. Kobrinskaya I. Rasshirenie NATO i vntropoliticheskaya bor'ba v Rossii // Segodnya. Avgust, 1995. 17. Naumkin V. V. Snizu vverkh i obratno. «Arabskaya vesna» i global'naya mezhdunarodnaya sistema // Rossiya v global'noi politike, 02.08.2011. / URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Snizuvverkh-i-obratno-15277 18. Ziganshin M. K. Rossiya-Turtsiya: ot dvustoronnego sotrudnichestva k mnogoplanovomu partnerstvu. Osh: 2009. C. 88. 19. Deklaratsiya o soyuznicheskom vzaimodeistvii mezhdu RF i Respublikoi Armeniya, orientirovannom v KhKhI vek. DiplomaticheskiiVestnik. 2000. ¹10. 20. Voznesenskii S. Poteri Rossii iz-za revolyutsii v Livii. Voennoe obozrenie // URL: http://topwar.ru/5312-poteri-rossii-iz-za-revolyucii-v-livii.html 21. Vinogradova S. M., Sotnichenko A. A. Barkhatnyi sezon 2008 goda: sozdanie novogo politicheskogo imidzha Turtsii v rossiiskikh SMI // Vestnik SPbGU. S 6, vyp.2. 22. Uçarol R. Siyasi Tarih (1789 – 2001). İstanbul: Der Yayınları, 2006. 23. A.A. Nogovitsyn rasskazal o gotovyashchikhsya Gruziei diversiyakh / RBK-02.09.2008 g.// URL: http://top.rbc.ru/society/02/09/2008/234716.shtml 24. Boldyrev A. V. «Problema chernomorskikh prolivov v rossiisko-turetskikh otnosheniyakh»// pod red. Zaitsev I.V. i Ul'chenko N.Yu. Turtsiya na rubezhe KhKh-KhKhI vekov. M.: IVRAN, 2008. 25. The EU-25's view of Turkey's membership bid // URL: http://www.euractiv.com / enlargement/eu-25-view-turkey-membership-bid/article-133328 26. Turkey, Russia Oppose to NATO Presence Black Sea // URL:http://www.todayszaman.com/ international_turkey-russia-oppose-to-nato-presence-in-black-sea_30409.html 27. TC Dışişleri Bakanlığı − Ofitsial'nyi sait ministerstva inostrannykh del Turtsii // URL: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_157---22-agustos-2008_bogazlardan-gecis hk_.tr.mfa 28. TC Dışişleri Bakanlığı − Ofitsial'nyi sait ministerstva inostrannykh del Turtsii // URL: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/default.tr.mfa 29. TC Dışişleri Bakanlığı − Ofitsial'nyi sait ministerstva inostrannykh del Turtsii // URL: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_159---28-agustos-2008_-gurcistan_daki-gelismeler-hk_.tr.mfa 30. TC Dışişleri Bakanlığı − Ofitsial'nyi sait ministerstva inostrannykh del Turtsii URL: http://www.turkey.mid.ru/text_t125.html 31. Taşpınar O. Turkey’s Middle East Policies: Between Neo-Ottomanism and Kemalism. Carnegy Endowment. Paper. October 7, 2008. 32. Svet O. Turkey’s “Zero Problem” Foreign Policy: An Untenable Balancing Act // NIMEP Insights. Vol. 2. ¹.1 URL: http://www.tuftsgloballeadership.org/ files/ resources/ nimep/ v2/ INSIGHTS06_Svet.pdf 33. Sengupta A. Myth and Rhetoric of the Turkish Model Exploring Developmental Alternatives. Chapter “Eurasianism or Neo-Ottomanism: The Neighborhood in Turkish Foreign Policy”. Kolkata, 2014. 34. Sarp Sınır Kapısı'nda Gergin Bekleyiş Hakim / haberler.com – 11.08.2008 // URL:http://www.haberler.com/sarp-sinir-kapisi-nda-gergin-bekleyis-hakim-haberi 35. Park B. “Komşularla sıfır sorun imkansız.” / Aksiyon Dergisi / URL: http://www.aksiyon.com.tr/dis-politika/komsularla-sifir-sorun-imkansiz_531214 36. Öztürk A. Rusya-Gürcistan Krizi: Yerel Bir Çatışma, Küresel Yansımalar, Cilt:4, ¹:7, 2009. 37. Komşularla Sıfır Sorun Politikamız / TC. Dışişleri Bakanlığı Resmi Sitesi // URL: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/komsularla-sifir-sorun-politikamiz.tr.mfa 38. Medvedev D. Turkey, Russia eye strategic partnership in Medvedev visit // Today’s Zaman. May 11, 2010. 39. Lin K. A New Eurasian Embrace. Turkey Pivots East While China Marches West. Transatlantic Academy Paper Series, 2014. 40. Karpat K. Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History: Selected Articles and Essays, BRILL, 2002. 41. Karadeniz’in Deniz Güvenliği // T.C. Genelkurmay Başkanlığı Resmi Sitesi//URL:http://www.tsk.tr/ULUSLARARASI_ILISKILER/417_Karadenizin_Deniz_Guvenligi/.htm 42. Jones D. “Syrian Opposition Eyes Turkey for Arms Support” // URL:http://www.voanews.com/english/news/middle-east/Syrian-Opposition-Eyes-Turkey-for-Arms-Support-141476353.html 43. Bakar İ. Jeopolitik Yaklaşımlar Çerçevesinde Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemde Türk-Rus Yönelişleri: Basılmamış doktora tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enst. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Anabilim Dalı. İst., 2006. 44. Belgesel: Kırmızı Hat Boğazlar ve Karedeniz / TRT / URL:http://www.belgesell.com/kirmizi-hat-bogazlar-ve-karadeniz.html 45. Dereli P.Change and Continuity in Russia’s Relations with the United States In Eurasia (2000-2005): Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science. The Graduate School of Social Sciences of the Middle East Technical University The Department of Eurasian Studies. Ankara, 2006. 46. Erdem T. Türk Boğazları ve Montrö Sözleşmesi. Jeopolitik, Haziran 2006. 47. Global Poll: “Iran Seen Playing Negative Role” // URL:http://www.globescan.com/news_ 48. Goble P. Caucasus: Analysis From Washington-Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict Risk Recognition. // ed. Çomak İ. / Rusya Stratejik Arşt.–1. İstanbul: TASAM . 2006. 49. İnaç H. Identity Problems of Turkey during the European Union Integration Process // Journal of Economic and Social Research. ¹ 6 (2). 50. Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi programı 2001. // URL: www.akparti.org.tr 51. AK Parti’nin 12. Kuruluş yıldönümü. // URL: http://www.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/ak-partinin-12.-kurulus-yil-donumu/50693Archives/bbc06-3/index.html 52. Bağcı H. Turkish Foreign and Security Policy in 2000-a retrospective // Turkish Daily News. December 26, 2006. |