Library
|
Your profile |
Politics and Society
Reference:
Shakhin K.
Dynamics of Globalisation in the Field of Culture
// Politics and Society.
2015. ¹ 6.
P. 696-701.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54393
Shakhin K. Dynamics of Globalisation in the Field of CultureAbstract: The main aim of the article is to reveal the peculiarities of the processes of globalisation in the field of culture, its main models and special features. Special attention is paid to the expansion of Western (first of all, American) culture to different regions and countries of the world, loss of traditional values and lifestyle, the national identity crisis, consolidation of material values and their prevalence over the spiritual values, as well as Americanisation of life in many countries of the world, etc. In summary, facts and conclusions are presented that prove that cultural globalisation occurs under the dominance of Western (American) culture. However, the East, in its turn, also influences the West, so the interconnected processes of Westernisation and Easternisation are taking place. The author adhered to the complex approach and the principle of objectivity. The study relied on the method of historical-sociological analysis, as well as the logical method that imply the examination of social processes in their historical consequence and logically generalised. The author used the methods of analysis and synthesis, studying cultural aspects of globalisation both partially and as a whole. Thus, it is possible to draw a conclusion that despite the doubtless universal distribution of Western values and orientations, the Western culture has not become universal on a global scale by now. The ideas of cultural diversity are being gradually consolidated, that brings the lacking elements to the system of public values. The consolidation of the idea of cultural diversity implies the necessity for every single society to learn how to select some components from other cultures, which should not create obstacles for self-identification within the framework of the emerging collage of the elements from different cultures. Keywords: strong-weak cultures, Easternisation, hybridisation, localisation, sub-globalisation, American cultural imperialism, global culture, globalisation, alternative globalisations, Westernisation
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Yu.V. Lobanova Sotsiokul'turnye posledstviya globalizatsii i problema dialoga kul'tur. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-4.-C. 130-136.
2. G.A. Korotkiy Rossiyskaya kul'tura v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-8.-C. 75-81. 3. M. V. Shugurov Dinamika global'nykh protsessov v kontekste tsennostnykh transformatsiy. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-12.-C. 73-86. 4. A.D. Ursul, T.A. Ursul Global'nye issledovaniya: ot globalizatsii znaniy k stanovleniyu global'nogo znaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-8.-C. 81-91. 5. K. E. Razlogov Chto stroim: krepost' ili avtostrady? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-1.-C. 7-17. 6. E.M. Drinova Modernizatsiya i globalizatsiya: formirovanie lokal'nykh toposov politizatsii religii // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-5.-C. 619-629. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.11. 7. Timur, Taner (2004), Türkiye Nasıl Küreselleşti, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara. 8. O. D. Baldina Predmetno-material'nyy mir narodnoy kul'tury v sfere sovremennoy kommunikatsii: «kontaktnye zony» // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-1.-C. 61-73. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.7. 9. Talas, Mustafa (2004), “Küreselleşme ve Kültür”, Küreselleşme ve Psikiyatri, Türk, Tabipler Birliği Yayınları, Ankara, s. 229-244. 10. Koray, Meryem (1997), “Küreselleşme İlerlerken Gerileyenler: Ekonomi Karşısında Sosyal, Sermaye Karşısında Emek, Piyasa Karşısında Siya-set”, İktisat Dergisi, S. 369, Temmuz 97, s. 17. 11. Robertson, Roland, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London, 1992. S.144 12. Şaylan, Gencay (1995), Değişim, Küreselleşme ve Devletin Yeni İşlevi, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara. 13. Eroğlu, Feyzullah (1999), “Küreselleşme Süreci ve Kimlik Krizi”, Türk Yurdu, Mart-Mayıs, C. 19, S. 139-141, s. 147-151. 14. Erkal, Mustafa (2001), “Etniklik ve Etnik Grup Kavramları Üzerine”, Türkiye ve Siyaset, S. 3, Temmuz-Ağustos, s. 38. 15. Erkizan, Hatice Nur (2002), “Küreselleşmenin Tarihsel ve Düşünsel Temelle-ri Üzerine”, Doğu Batı Dergisi, Yıl: 5, S. 18, Şubat-Nisan, s. 65-79. 16. Aydemir, Cahit (2000), Küreselleşme Kavramı ve Ekonomik Yönü, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı. 20, s. 260-282 17. Canbolat, İbrahim (2002), Küreselleşen Dünya ve Türkiye, Vipaş Yay., Bursa. 18. Berger, Peter L. (2003), “Küreselleşmenin Kültürel Dinamikleri”, Bir Küre Bin Bir Küreselleşme, Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul. 19. Giddens E. Uskol'zayushchiy mir: kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn'/ Per. s angl. M., Izd-vo «Ves' mir», 2004. – 120 s. 20. Kultygin V. P. Nezapadnye kontseptsii globalizatsii // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. — 2002. — T.4, vyp.1-2(11-12). — S.80-103. 21. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya / Pod red. P. Bergera i S. Khantingtona. Per. s angl. V. V. Sapova pod red. M. M. Lebedevoy. — M.: Aspekt Press, 2004.— 379 s. |