Library
|
Your profile |
Politics and Society
Reference:
Lytkina K.A.
The Phenomenon of Elections in the Context of Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Democracy (Comparative Analysis of Russia and Foreign Countries)
// Politics and Society.
2015. ¹ 3.
P. 354-368.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54358
Lytkina K.A. The Phenomenon of Elections in the Context of Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Democracy (Comparative Analysis of Russia and Foreign Countries)Abstract: This article studies how the phenomenon of elections is explored in Arend Lijphart’s theory of democracy. The author highlights the main theses that serve as justification for division of democracies to «majoritarian» and «consensus», and briefly describes the variables that allow to attribute a country to a particular type of democracy: the number of effective parliamentary parties, party composition of the government, balance of powers between executive and legislative branches, disproportionality of the elective system, level of centralisation/decentralisation, number of chambers of the parliament, rigidity or flexibility of the Constitution, judicial control, independence of the central bank, and the level of participatory democracy. Methods of comparative analysis were used, the author also used calculations based on the formulas of Laakso and Taagepera's, Juan Molinar's and Golosov's indexes. Disproportionality of the Russian elective system was evaluated according to Michael Gallagher's methods. The analysis of Russian system is based on variables of different dimensions of democracy. The article also provides comparative analysis of the elective processes in countries with different types of democracy. Russia was labelled as a country with majoritarian type of democracy. It is generally confirmed by the patterns of voting behaviour examined in the article, as well as the fact that the strong presidential regime makes the whole political system "more majoritarian", even if the elections to the legislative organs are held according to the system of proportional representation. Keywords: federal-unitary dimension of democracy, executive-parties dimension of democracy, electoral system, voting behaviour, political system, theory of democracy, consensus democracy, majoritarian democracy, elections, Arend Lijphart
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Analiticheskaya spravka o postuplenii administriruemykh FNS Rossii dokhodov v konsolidirovannyy byudzhet Rossiyskoy Federatsii. URL: http://analytic.nalog.ru/portal/index.ru-RU.htm (data obrashcheniya: 08.02.2015)
2. Golosov G.V. Mir partiynykh sistem i partiynye sistemy mira [Elektronnyy resurs] // http://polit.ru/article/2011/04/06/partyism/ 3. Ivanov V. A.. Pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya federal'nykh organov zakonodatel'noy i ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii v zakonodatel'nom protsesse : Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk : Moskva, 2006. – 205 s. 4. Leksin V.N. Doklad na temu Federal'nyy tsentr i sub'ekty Federatsii: problemy vzaimovliyaniya i vzaimodeystviya. S.6. Federal'nyy tsentr v regionakh: problemy rukovodstva i upravleniya. Materialy nauchnogo seminara / Pod red. V.I. Yakunina. Vypusk ¹ 4 (9). M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2007. – 144 s. 5. Skol'ko partiy nuzhno Rossii? Press-vypusk ¹2590. VTsIOM. 26.05.2014. URL: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=459&uid=114836 (data obrashcheniya: 08.02.2015). 6. Smirnyagin L. V., Busygina I. M., Rossiyskiy federalizm. 2009. URL: http://www.inop.ru/files/Chapter10.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.02.2015). 7. Timerbaev T.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye probely v sistemnom vzaimodeystvii organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii / T. A. Timerbaev // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal (EvrAzYuzh). – 2012. – ¹ 9. – S. 72-74. 8. Uchastie rossiyan v politicheskoy zhizni strany v 2013 godu. VTsIOM. [Elektronnyy resurs] // Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy. — 03.04.2013. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/news/2013/04/03/5773 (data obrashcheniya: 08.02.2015). 9. Chleny Soveta Federatsii RF-chleny partii «Edinaya Rossiya». URL: http://er.ru/persons/federal_council/ (data obrashcheniya: 08.02.2015). 10. Chaisty P. «Majority control and executive dominance: Parliament-President relations in Putin’s Russia» Politics in Russia. Edited by Joel M. Ostrow, CQ Press, Thousand Oaks, USA, 2012. 11. Dincer N., Eichengreen B. Central Bank Transparency and Independence: Updates and New Measures, 2013. 12. Elections and Democracy: Representation and Accountability. Comparative Study Of Electoral Systems. Edited by Jacques Thomassen / Oxford University Press, 2014. 13. Gallagher, M. «Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems». Electoral Studies, 10 (1): 33–51, 1991. 14. Laakso M., Taagepera R. The «Effective» Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe // Comparative Political Studies. ¹ 12. P. 3–27, 1979. 15. Lijphart, A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven/London: Yale University Press, 1999. 16. Molinar J. Counting the Number of Parties: an Alternative Index // American Political Science Review. Vol. 85. ¹ 4, 1991. 17. Taagepera, R. «Arend Lijphart’s Dimensions of Democracy: Logical Connections and Institutional Design». Political Studies, 51 (1): 1–19, 2003. 18. Vatter, A., Bernauer, J. «The Missing Dimension of Democracy: Institutional Patterns in 25 EU Member States between 1997 and 2006». European Union Politics, 10 (3): 335–59, 2009. 19. Vatter, A., Vernauer, J. Consensus Democracy Indicators in 35 Democracies, 1997–2006, Berne/Konstanz: Department of Political Science, 2011. 20. Voter Turnout. The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance URL: http://www.idea.int/vt/ (data obrashcheniya: 08.02.2015). 21. Wessels, B., Schmitt, H. «What Shapes Electoral Choice Options? Institutional Determinants of the Distinctiveness of Choice Options?» Presented at the Electoral Systems and Electoral Politics Bangalore CSES Workshop, 2–3 November, 2006. |