Library
|
Your profile |
Politics and Society
Reference:
Poyarkov, S.Y.
Problems of implementation of the concept
of constitutionalism at the supranational level
// Politics and Society.
2014. ¹ 7.
P. 824-836.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54257
Poyarkov, S.Y. Problems of implementation of the concept of constitutionalism at the supranational levelAbstract: The object of this study is the process and conditions for the formation of constitutionalism at the supranational level of social relations. The need to understand the process of formation of constitutionalism at the supranational level is due to the fact that the process of constitutional development is to a great extent defi ned by the processes of globalization and denationalization in the conditions when the state remain the main subject of international relations. Taking into account that constitutionalism is a special system defi ning the form of organization and dynamics of the political force in the interactions between state and civil society, the supranational level duplicates this mechanism of constitutionalism formation. It causes problems regarding legitimacy of power, sovereignty of the state and human rights at the national and global levels. The methodology of this study involves systemic approach as a combination of methods and means of multidimensional idea of constitutionalism as a globalization phenomenon. The study defi nes that the problems of formation of constitutionalism at the supranational level are caused by the absence of comprehensive ideological fundamentals for the political and legal associations of autonomous independent formations due to the insuffi cient formation of constitutionalism structures at the global scale. In the modern society the formation of supranational constitutionalism is caused by, fi rstly, the need for the institutional systematization of the development processes in the existing system of international relations in order to form the situation when effi cient political activity catalyzes social change. Secondly, it is due to the need to limit the activities of the existing subjects of political power and to form novel institutions while preserving the sphere of autonomy for states or other subjects. Thirdly, it is necessary in order to complement and strengthen internal constitutional guarantees. Keywords: Constitutionalism, political system, political power, state, globalization, constitutional order, systemic approach, global order, integrity, civil society.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Walker N. The EU and the WTO: Constitutionalism in a New Key, in The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues 31, 35.
2. Walker N. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism». Modern Law Review 2002. 65(3): P. 339-340 3. Maccormick N. Questioning sovereignty. Oxford U. Press 1999 n.8, P. 104. 4. Herbert H. L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 5. Lauterpacht H. 1950. International Law and Human Rights. London: Stevens. P. 60-67 . 6. Id. at 72-73. 7. Id. at 88. 8. Id., at 162. 9. Fuller L. L. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. R.33-94 10. Tomuschat C. International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of A New Century, General Course on Public International Law, 281 Recueil des Cours 9 (1999); n.3 R. 95. 11. Habermas J. Between Naturalism and Religion (Polity Press , Cambridge, 2008) 316. 12. Fassbender B. 1998b. The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community." Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36:529-619. r. 567-568 13. Held D. Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance 17 (1995); R. 23. 14. Gerstenberg O. Denationalization and the Very Idea of Democratic Constitutionalism: The Case for the European Community (2001) 14 Ratio Juris. R.298 – 325 . 15. Klabbers J. Constitutionalism Lite International Organizations Law Review. 2004. 1. R.31 – 58 . 16. Lauterpacht H. International Law and Human Rights. London: Stevens. 1950. R. 61-67 17. Kumm M. The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis. European Journal of International Law 2004. 15(5): R. 907-931. 18. Teubner G. Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory? In Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism: International Studies in the Theory of Private Law, ed. Christian Joerges, Inger-Johanne Sand and Gunther Teubner. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 2004. R. 3-28. 19. Klabbers J., Peters A.and Ulfstein G.The Constitutionalization of International Law ( Oxford University Press , Oxford , 2009 ); Werner (n.16). 20. Joerges Ch. nd Petersmann E.U.,eds. 2006. Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 21. Trachtman J. P. The Constitutions of the WTO. " European Journal of International Law 2006. 17(3): R.623-646. 22. de Wet E. The Emergence of International and Regional Value Systems as a Manifestation of the Emerging International Constitutional Order. " Leiden Journal of International Law 2006. 19(3): R. 611-632. 23. Peters A. Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures ( 2006 ) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 579 . 24. Peters A. & Armingeon K. Introduction—Global Constitutionalism from an Interdisciplinary Perspective, 16 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 385 (2009) 25. Peters A. Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures. Leiden Journal of International Law 2006. 19(3): R.579-610. 26. Cass D. Z. The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization. Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005. 27. Schorkopf F. Walter C. Elements of Constitutionalisation: Multilevel Structures of Human Rights Protection in General International and WTO-Law. German Law Journal 2003. 4(12): R.1359-1374. 28. Stephen G. Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations. 59-60 International Studies Review 2002. (2): R. 47-65. 29. Preu U. Equality of States. Its Meaning in a Constitutionalized Global Order Hertie School of Governance – working papers, No. 15, April 2008. 30. Michael A. Globalization and Peremptory Norms in International Law: fromWestphalian to Global Constitutionalism? International Politics 2004. 41(3): R. 341-353. 31. Walker N. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism ’ ( 2002 ) 65 Modern Law Review 385 . 32. Krisch N. 2006. «The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law».European Journal of International Law 17(1): P. 248. 33. Halberstam D. Local, global, and plural sonstitutionalism: Europe meets the world. Public law and legal theory working paper series Working paper No. 176, december 2009. 34. Weiler J.H.H. Federalism without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg, in the federal vision 54, 62-70 (K. Nicolaidis & R. Howse eds., Oxford U. Press 2001). 35. Howse R., Nicolaidis K., Democracy without Sovereignty: The Global Vocation of Political Ethics, in T. BROUDE AND Y. SHANY, EDS., The shifting allocation of authority in international law 163, 178 (Hart: Oxford and Portland, 2008). 36. Poyarkov S.Yu. Konstitutsionalizm kak osnova ratsional'noy politicheskoy sistemy sovremennogo obshchestva // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 13. - C. 1882 - 1890. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.10094. 37. Borisenkov A.A. Politicheskaya vlast' – politicheskaya substantsiya // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 193 - 217. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.6.806. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_806.html 38. Borisenkov A.A. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya konstitutsiya o vlasti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 1. - C. 19 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10585. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10585.html 39. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. «Uvlechenie obshchimi mestami» i tsennostnyy komponent konstitutsionalizma // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 296 - 317. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.3.503. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_503.html 40. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Problemy vzaimodeystviya grazhdanskogo obshchestva i gosudarstva v sovremennoy Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 55. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.585. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_585.html 41. Znamenskiy D.Yu., Mikhalina O.A. Vliyanie tipa politicheskoy sistemy na model' formirovaniya gosudarstvennoy politiki // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2014. - 3. - C. 87 - 100. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.3.11121. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_11121.html |