Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Maksimov, A. A. Management at State Organizations as a Method of Increasing Effi ciency of State Administration

Abstract: The subject under review of the present research article is the improvement of the management effi ciency at organizations of the state sector through using different mechanisms of adopting methods and models from organizations of the private sector of the economy. The author describes modern trends in choosing methods of increasing management effi ciency such as human resource rotation in the state and private sectors of economics and provides a critical evaluation of these methods. The author also views peculiarities of using the concept of the new public management as an alternative to the traditional form of public administration and provides a critical evaluation of these methods as well. In his research the author has used the following methods: the expert survey method, content analysis of documents and scientifi c resources on the matter and secondary data analysis. The article also presents the results of the analysis of the methods of improving effi ciency of public management that are of immediate interest under the conditions of the modern Russian environment. The author also offers his own classifi cation of effi ciency improvement methods and carries out a critical analysis of the results of implementing the new public management concept. At the end of the article the author concludes about the need to apply the evolutionary approach to increasing the effi ciency of public administration.


Keywords:

Effi ciency, management, rotation, revolving door syndrome, management, new public administration, evolutionary, revolutionary, bureaucracy, neo-liberalism.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bagdasaryan V.E. Upravlencheskiy avtonomizm, ili «lozh' demokratii» // Problemy sovremennogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v Rossii: Materialy nauchnogo seminara / Pod red. V.I. Yakunina-M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2006.-Vyp. 1.-S. 61.
2. Barkov S.A. Organizatsiya i rynok: protivoborstvo ili soglasie? M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2008, s.166
3. Gvishiani D. M., Organizatsiya i upravlenie. Sotsiologicheskiy analiz burzhuaznykh teoriy, M., 1970
4. Dobren'kov V.I. Tsennostno-orientirovannaya sotsiologiya: problemnoe pole postneklassicheskoy metodologii. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt; Al'ma Mater, 2011. s. 53
5. Obolonskiy A.V. Byurokratiya dlya KhKhI veka? Modeli gosudarstvennoy sluzhby – Rossiya, SShA, Angliya, Avstraliya. M., «Delo», 2002, s. 61
6. Reyni Khel Dzh Analiz i upravlenie v gosudarstvennykh organizatsiyakh.:Per. s angl. – 2-e izd. – M.: Infra-M. 2002. KhIV, s. 264
7. Chiapello, E. and N. Fairclough. 2002. ‘Understanding the New Management Ideology: a Transdisciplinary Contribution from Critical Discourse Analysis and New Sociology of Capitalism’, Discourse & Society, 13, 2, 185–208.
8. DeHart-Davis, L., J. Marlowe, et al. (2006) Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review 66(6): 873–887.
9. Diefenbach, T. New Public Management in public dector organizations: the dark side of managerialistic “enlightenment”. Public Administration Vol. 87, No. 4, 2009 (892–909)
10. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Haque, M.S. 1999. ‘Ethical Tension in Public Governance: Critical Impacts on Theory-Building’, Administrative Theory & Praxis,21, 4, 468–73.
12. Hartman, R., and Weber, A. The Rewards of Public Service. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1980
13. Hoggett, P. 1996. ‘New Modes of Control in the Public Service’, Public Administration, 74, 1, 9–32.
14. Moynihan, D. P. (2008) The Normative Model in Decline? Public Service Motivation in the Age of Governance. Motivation in Public Management. The Call of Public Service. J. L. Perry and A. Hondeghem. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 247–267.
15. Perry, J. L. and A. Hondeghem (2008) Editors' Introduction. Motivation in Public Management: The call of Public Service. J. L. Perry and A. Hondeghem. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 1-14.
16. Steen, T. (2006) Revaluing Bureaucracy: what about public servant's motivation? EGPA annual Conference, Milan.
17. Itogovyy analiticheskiy doklad «Regional'nye modeli vzaimodeystviya mezhdu delovymi i vlastnymi elitami: sovremennye protsessy i ikh sotsial'no-politicheskie protsessy», ANO «Institut obshchestvennogo proektirovaniya»// http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-219668.html?page=4
18. Kommersant. Ogonek, 17 fevralya 2014, ¹6 (5312), s. 31
19. Vedomosti. 17 marta 2014 ¹ 45(3549) («Pretenzii po punktam»)
20. http://www.niann.ru/?id=430891&template=yandex
21. http://zagolovki.ru/daytheme/medvedev/24Jul2008
22. http://www.regnum.ru/news/1630460.html#ixzz2twKAAVPG