Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Popov, E.A. Interdisciplinary experience in humanitarian research and modern sociology.

Abstract: The article draws attention to an issue that affects all branches of academic science – the integration of science. There are several viewpoints on this topic – some support the notion of self-sufficient spheres of social and humanitarian thought, others stress the necessity of close interaction of such spheres. This article provides a breakdown of positive and negative aspects of interdisciplinary interaction, drawing our attention to the special role of Sociology in the processes of integration of knowledge. Exemplifying this branch of thought, the author examines the methodological vector of interaction between Philosophy and Sociology, as well as Sociology and the entire mass of social and humanitarian knowledge. The conclusions drawn in this article have significance in terms of defining the object and the subject of various disciplines, as well as for formulating goals aimed to preserve the founding principles of scientific research which can be distorted within an interdisciplinary environment.


Keywords:

Sociology, society, science, interdisciplinary, methodology, development, philosophy, socium, politization, sociality


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Aleksandrov Yu.I., Kirdina S.G. Tipy mental'nosti i institutsional'nye matritsy: mul'tidistsiplinarnyy podkhod // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. ¹ 8.
2. Aleksandrovskiy Yu.A. Sotsial'nye kataklizmy i psikhicheskoe zdorov'e // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2010. ¹ 4.
3. Alekseeva I.Yu. Modeli filosofii // Filosofskie nauki. 2012. ¹ 9.
4. Akhiezer A.S. Ob osobennostyakh sovremennogo filosofstvovaniya (Vzglyad iz Rossii) // Voprosy filosofii. 1998. ¹ 2.
5. Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. M., 1996.
6. Gudkov L.D. Sotsiologiya kul'tury: nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor tematicheskogo nomera «Kel'nskogo zhurnala po sotsiologii i sotsial'noy psikhologii» // Kul'turologiya: Daydzhest. M., 2012. ¹ 1 (60).
7. El'chaninov V.A. Negativnaya metodologiya nauki: monografiya. Barnaul, 2012.
8. Kemerov V.E. Gumanitarnoe i sotsial'noe: ot oppozitsii k sintezu // Chelovek. 2011. ¹ 1.
9. Krasnov M.A., Krasnov P.M. K razrabotke Indeksa okhrany chelovecheskogo dostoinstva // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2011. ¹ 6.
10. Kultygin V.P. Tendentsii v evropeyskoy sotsiologicheskoy teorii nachala KhKhI veka // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2001. ¹ 8.
11. Kutyrev V.A. Ot kakogo nasledstva my ne otkazyvaemsya // Chelovek. 2005. ¹ 2.
12. Losev A.F. Strast' k dialektike. M., 1990.
13. Markov B.V. Obraz cheloveka v postantropologicheskuyu epokhu // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. ¹ 2.
14. Moskvichev L.N. Etapy institutsionalizatsii rossiyskoy sotsiologii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2006. ¹ 7.
15. Popov E.A. Diversifikatsiya sotsiogumanitarnogo znaniya: smysly sotsial'nogo i apologiya supersotsial'nogo // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. ¹ 11.
16. Sokolov A.V. Formula intelligentnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. ¹ 5.
17. Shtompka P. Formirovanie sotsiologicheskogo voobrazheniya. Znachenie teorii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2005. ¹ 10.
18. Shcherbina V.V. Sushchestvuet li segodnya nauka sotsiologiya? // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. ¹ 8.
19. Epshteyn M.N. Konstruktivnyy potentsial gumanitarnykh nauk: mogut li oni izmenyat' to, chto izuchayut? // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. ¹ 12